Friday Jun 19, 2026
Friday Jun 19, 2026
Wednesday, 17 June 2026 04:19 - - {{hitsCtrl.values.hits}}
Zahira’s zealous performance boosted them above the usual elite rugby playing entities in week 7, leading up to the most pivotal final weeks of the League. This steep improvement must have certainly got the Trinity camp’s attention and respect, as they are set to meet next weekend.
For those who are surprised about the outcome of this encounter, and are looking for a quick analysis, the breakdown is quite simple. The Saints’ horrendous game discipline in the opening half, held them captive in purgatory, while the Eagles soared high and reigned with their esteemed abstinence. In the closing half, they simply switched hats, hence the game became balanced, leading to a close finish. That was it, and there was nothing else to it, as the stats depict below.
SACK gleefully cashed-in on 3 points, from an offside penalty awarded 5m away from Joes’ front door
Anthony’s desecrated the Saints’ sacred space, off two consecutive penalties, viz. ‘deliberate knock-on’ and ‘high tackle’
The visitors lost a fine chance of scoring, by punting the ball out of the ground while rigorously attacking inside Joes’ 15m
The Josephians spotted an unprotected space adjacent to a breakdown while attacking inside Antho’s 22, which they exploited to break through for a Try
St. Anthony’s scored through a 5m lineout, which was an outcome of a needless ‘late charge’ penalty
The hosts missed a scoring chance inside the visitors’ 10, by conceding a ‘hands in the Ruck’ penalty, while attacking close to the Tryline
Anthony’s crazy number of offenses combined with 2 yellow cards, yet again, brought mayhem and destruction upon them
Joes scored their second Try, made easy by multiple penalties by Antho
SACK returned the attack to score a converted Try, that was fuelled by multiple penalty advantages by Joes
The Saints scored off a scrum inside Antho’s 10, which was awarded to them due to an accidental obstruction
The Darley Road lads scored the equalizer, thanks to the multiple back-to-back penalties donated by the Antonians
St. Joseph’s scored the winning points at the last minute of the game, through a ‘not 10’ penalty conceded on Antho’s front porch
Result: Antonians reject the feast 20-23
The fresh and energetic Bamba Brigade bombarded the Green Machine from the word go, before they could break in. This was the most crucial aspect of this match that set the tone for the entire game. The Peterites sped on an extremely soggy and rather hazardous turf effortlessly, pushing back and infiltrating the Pathana defence with ease, making one wonder, if this was the same team that stood strong like the Sigiriya Rock between the Royal Tuskers and the green line of prestige? In contrast, the home team struggled immensely with the wet ball throughout the game, making them look like the visiting team. Moreover, Pathana’s lapsed game discipline, supplied sufficient fuel to the Brigade to supersede them in the opening half.
While this season’s edition of the Brigade has the capability to keep scoring even with a high infringements count, the fewer ‘loss of possession’ enabled them to outclass the Greens without breaking much sweat
The high penalty count and the yellow card conceded by Pathana, made matters even worse for their already shaky defence. Particularly, Isipathana’s Maul defence was in tatters, where the Peterites strolled their Pack like a baby in a Pram, beyond their line of prestige
SPC scored two Tries aided by Pathana penalties, viz. ‘leaning in lineout’ and ‘offside’
Peter’s attacked in phases, following a clearance kick that was caught inside Pathana’s 40. Subsequently, Pathana’s line that was already underlapped, rushed forward creating an opportunity for SPC to work the ball through the blindside for a Try. This wasn’t the first time that Pathana showed this exact weakness in their rush defence and structure, during the past few weeks.
Pathana missed a regulation conversion in front of the giant sticks, while SPC slotted one from an acute angle, that made up the 4-points deficit in the inaugural half itself
Just as in the Joes-Antho game, something happened while munching Melons at the break, that switched the naughty devil to the other side, as the Peterites doubled their offenses count, thereby doubling their ‘loss of possession’ tally from 7 to 14 as well
On the contrary, Pathana halved their offenses count, thereby halving their ‘loss of possession’ count as well from 10 to 5
The above contrast offered the home team plenty of ball possession to attack with, but regrettably only a solitary Try was scored off consecutive SPC penalties. This is partly owing to the visitors’ defence, and mostly owing to Pathana’s temporary paralysis in decision making.
Some of the major lapses in decision making occurred continuously in the second half while Pathana attacked inside SPC’s grid. Although the Green Forwards successfully and frequently sucked in the opposition defenders into their phased attacks, they consistently failed to feed their Backline at the right times, even while commanding clear overlaps, where they could have easily gained significant real estate.
Something must have clicked back in place in the last 5 minutes for Pathana, that they suddenly commenced passing the ball to the Backline at the most optimal points, that rewarded them with two Tries in quick succession
While Pathana had abundant ball possession in the latter half, their incapability to handle the wet and muddy ball, slowed their onslaughts down tremendously, while decision paralysis deprived them of a good couple of chances of infiltrating deep into enemy lines.
It is not easy to Place Kick on soft and slippery surfaces, as the runup to the kicks become unstable, that dilutes the focus, hence accuracy of the kicks. Meanwhile Peter’s slotted another not-so-easy conversion in the closing half that added 2 more points, making it a total of 4 points that were never meant to be, which was possibly what nudged them over the finish line.
Result: Erroneous Pathana buried in home mud 25-29
Ananda College hosted STC on a green field that could be quite lucrative for paddy cultivation. School children were made to play a hazardous sport like rugby, on a turf that one could barely stand on, let alone walk steadily.
While Sri Lankan schools’ rugby has just broken its shackles of the already high benchmarks held, and being on an ascension path to excellence, the rugby ground conditions across Colombo is pathetic during rainy seasons, putting schoolkids at high risk. While school administrations collect thumping sums for entrance tickets, no consideration is given to player welfare or safety by most of them over the years. Common sense to acknowledge that a ground is unsuitable to play a game like rugby is mostly overshadowed by greed for extra collection, whereas the most sensible, but costlier thing to do is to switch venues, or postpone the fixtures. The education ministry should seriously look into this matter immediately, as it appears that no one really cares about player welfare at all.
Despite the absurd ground conditions that they were forced to play in, both teams excelled in ball handling, particularly the visitors, who didn’t commit a single handling error in the opening half.
While STC lost fewer possessions, they conceded 50% more points than their opponents.
An ill exit strategy by STC, that didn’t suit the paddy field conditions, entrapped them in their in-goal area, and consequently resulted in a Maul turnover, through which Ananda scored via the proceeding scrum
STC scored two Tries off Ananda penalties conceded inside their grid, while Ananda scored only one Try owing to an offense committed inside STC’s redzone
Ananda slotted 2 penalties for the return of 6 points, while STC was content with 3
The extra points that didn’t add up by lost possessions, came through a Try when STC stroked an Ananda Touch Kick that was heading out, close to their 22, that resulted in an Ananda lineout throw, thru which they worked the ball to score a Try
Once again, in spite of the loss of possession being comparable, STC conceded more points than they should have.
Both teams scored a Try each using penalty opportunities provided by the opposition, coupled with yellow cards
The unaccounted points came when Ananda scored a Try after patiently taking their time to attack in phases, following a STC 22m dropout
Two Thomians were banished with a yellow and a red card in the closing half. The yellow was owing to an intentional foul play under the dark shades of a Maul, and the red was due to a dangerous lift and drop. It is understood that the Thomian coaching crew is under tremendous pressure due to the recent setbacks, with all efforts to recover leading to the ICU; but that doesn’t mean that safety during contact play can be overlooked or compromised.
This incident serves as a RED ALERT to all schools in the League to beef up safety standards during contact rugby, in order to maximise player safety with accordance to the laws of World Rugby.
No Trophy is worthier than a single life!
Result: STC’s indiscipline at the end, ends their fighting chance 24-37
The dynamic lads from Zahira College adrenalized the assembled with some fast and furious running rugby, executed with sheer confidence throughout the game. Although the Wesleyites weren’t far behind, the immense confidence that the Zahirians possessed, manifested in their clear-cut, highly penetrative rugby, was executed with pristine decision making. Usually, only champion teams play this brand of rugby.
Except in the case of Zahira’s degraded game discipline, both teams exhibited top-class rugby with enviably clean stats, consisting of just a solitary error in the opening half. Zahira survived two simultaneous yellow cards with their mesmerising attacking rugby, but how did they manage to concede so much less points while committing double the offenses, and having lost possession, twice as much as Wesley?
Two of Zahira’s penalties were yielded while attacking deep inside Wesley’s redzone, viz. ‘holding on’ and ‘obstruction’, that brings down the ‘lost possession’ deficit to one
Zahira attacked following a Wesley goal-line dropout, by working it all the way to the oppositions’ front door, where it was contested and knocked-on by Wesley. Zahira subsequently scored a Try via the proceeding 5m scrum, as a result of the only handling error by the hosts.
The visitors counterattacked after effecting a Ruck turnover close to Wesley‘s 22, to score a surprise Try
Wesley scored two Tries utilising back-to-back Zahira penalties in this half
Zahira kicked the ball into Wesley’s 22, and charged it down fiercely to unsettle the defender, which caused him to spill the ball while passing. Next, the loose ball was kicked into the in-goal area by the charging Zahirian, who later pounced on it for a Try.
In summary, Zahira scored only one Try off Wesley’s mistakes, but scored the other two with their attacking gameplay
In spite of the ‘total loss of possession’ being comparable, how did Zahira score twice as much as Wesley in the second half?
Zahira scored 3 converted Tries, while Wesley scored 2 unconverted Tries in the last session
Wesley scored a Try off an offside penalty committed inside Zahira’s redzone, and another thru a knock-on and subsequent penalty conceded inside Zahira’s redzone as well
Zahira scored 2 of their 3 Tries off consecutive Wesley penalties
Zahira gained substantial real estate while exchanging kicks that offered them a lineout on Wesley’s 40. The visitors capitalised on the chance, as they picked and drove through the weary Wesley Forwards defence to score a Try
Result: Hasty Zahirians induce nervous breakdown 38-24
Another top-quality game of rugby was worked out in the Bowl Segment with two “wannabe clinical” schoolboy sides competing with dire commitment, executing rugby skills that were parallel to the Cup Segment, perhaps even higher. Both teams played clinical rugby, which meant that they had gameplans according to their opponent’s strengths and weaknesses, while also executing ambitious moves in order to break through defences, as opposed to sitting pretty until things happened.
Regardless of who won, both sides should be very proud of themselves, for trying their best to stick to their respective gameplans, and countering the opposition’s meticulous onslaughts making real-time decisions, whilst delivering high-end rugby, that elevates Sri Lankan Schools Rugby to where it is today. A respectful salute goes out to the coaching units, and the players of both teams.
Both teams were neck-to-neck in terms of the stats and ‘delta loss in possession’, however DS conceded 7 points more, which shall be analysed below.
Science scored the first Try off the only unforced knock-on conceded by DS in the whole game, via a scrum awarded just inside DS 40
Science’s first, but uncharacteristically casual clearance kick to touch, proved how inferior their Maul defence was against the power of Donz, as they were forced to trod backwards even more casually, for a Rolling Maul Try
DS attacked off a scrum, that was awarded on Science’s 45 following a knock-on, and then worked their Maul again off a subsequent ‘offside’ penalty, to score another Rolling Maul Try, at which point the hosts seemed highly volatile, and their near future in gloom
Science scored with the aid of multiple penalties and advantages, as DS struggled to defend Pick & Drives without committing offenses. Apparently, DS committed a total of 7 offenses in the opening half, out of which 3 were played advantage that Science used to attack and score with confidence.
DS was facilitated by two consecutive penalties by Science, the first forfeited inside DS grid (side entry), and the second granted inside Science’s grid (sealing the Ball), to score a relatively easy Try
Science entered the Donz zone and attacked following a 30 plus meter Touch Kick during open play. An ‘offside’ penalty advantage while attacking inside their redzone, bestowed courage for an impulse chip kick, that was successfully converted into a Try
The moment when the Scientists beat the stats arrived, as they kicked and charged from inside their own half to score a corner Try
While the ‘loss of possession’ was exactly the same, how did Science concede considerably more points than their opponents?
The hosts scored a converted Try, and slotted two penalty kicks, both off abundant and back-to-back penalty opportunities offered by the visitors
DS scored only a solitary Try off consecutive Science penalties, and another off a forced knock-on by Science, committed inside their 5m
Donz’s bonus points came through when they cleared the ball from inside their 22 with a touch finder exceeding 30m, which got touched by an opposition defender on its way out. DS worked their Rolling Maul one last time, from the subsequent lineout all the way from their 40m, and beyond Science’s 22, to proceed with a phased onslaught to score the last Try
Donz missed their last chance to score while fiercely attacking inside the opposition’s 22, by handling the ball inside the Ruck, that lead to a penalty
Result: Donz’s indiscipline ditches last life 36-37
How to interpret results:
The points scored by the first team mentioned in the results phrase, appears first.
Ex: Ananda whines to Wesley 12-20, means Ananda scored 12
Pix courtesy: thepapare.com
(Tell us what you love and hate: [email protected])
