Isipathana College, who successfully defended the Dialog President's Trophy edging out Trinity College, celebrate their win

The Green section of the Sky Pavilion was almost at full capacity at 3 p.m., and was completely overwhelmed by 3:15. In recent years, this has never occurred until 3:45 p.m. The patrons at the Grand Stand took their own cool time to fill up the premium seatings of Rs. 1500, Rs. 2000 and Rs. 2500, that included the gracious attendance of the nation’s Prime Minister Dr. Harini Amarasuriya.

Although the young Lions brought the courageous and unwavering “Lion Hearts” with them this time around, they burnt down the Rugby Law Books, dispersing its ashes into the “Lion’s Mouth” as they passed Kadugannawa on their way to Colombo for the final showdown, for its debris never to be found again. Amassing a whopping 25 penalties, inclusive of 7 advantages, self-destructed almost all of their offensive efforts, while the rest of them were hindered by close to 10 unforced handling errors, that rendered Trinity Try-less, and sunk their level of temperament in this game down to an abysmally average “Segment B” team. To draw some perspective, one can consider the following stats pertaining to the 2025 Premier Knockout Trophy encounters.  

St. Benedict’s was continuously put under severe pressure by the much heavier and technically superior Ananda Forwards, but yet yielded only 8 penalties. 

However, the formidable Trinity defence was back in arms covering and protecting their every folly. Conceding only two Tries despite an infringement count exceeding 20 is something rarely witnessed, and should undoubtedly be eligible for a nomination for an all-time best defence effort. 

Lions break down

Trinity’s non-stop foul party starter gift pack grants Pathana the first (converted) try, with the last two fuelling offenses being ‘early tackle’ and ‘offside’, with the former offense reducing Trinity to 14 defenders.

Trinity missed two eminently imminent tries by knocking on the first one close to Pathana’s 5m mark, and the other one almost on Pathana’s line of prestige.

Although Trinity slotted two penalties given inside Pathana’s grid in the first half, they refused to take a reasonably straight one offered at 55m from the giant Sticks, which could have been a sitter for Shan at the moment.

Trinity missed 2 easy penalty kicks in the second half, but somewhat made up for it with a long-coming drop goal to lead 9-7.

Trinity’s spellbinding interception try in the latter half was disallowed due to a completely unwarranted ‘side entry’ offense at a Maul that could have been easily avoided.

In the final minutes of the game, Isipathana was invited from their half into Trinity’s front door by a series of infringements, viz. ‘hands in Ruck’, ‘off feet’ and ‘offside’ to power up the broken green machine. 

Broken down machine

Isipathana wasted precious possession by kicking the ball away throughout the game. Although it was permissible in the prior half, it was utterly unintelligent in the last quarter, especially since the kicks were rarely chased.

A reason for this could be the effect of the Trinity rush defence mesmerising the Pathana ball carriers with the Medusa effect, often making them look absolutely clueless with ball-in-hand, whilst thieving precious vantage ground from them.

Isipathana shrugged off a few easy penalty opportunities in front of the posts, but later attempted and failed 3 challenging chances.

In the dying seconds of the game when the Lions had the Panthers’ backs pinned against the grim and cold wall leading 9-7, the forecasted typical grit of the Greens suddenly burst out of nowhere to zip through a narrow gap that opened up for the first time after a long while in the game, to score the last-second try that stamped the superiority of the Green Machine as being the epitome of temperament in schools rugby. This reaffirms the prophecy in our pre-season teaser article where it was quoted, “The present coaching unit has further enhanced the “Die Hard” attitude of the Pathans to an exhilarating level, that no opposition can assume victory with any kind of lead until the last long whistle is blown, making this year’s Green Machine a fierce contender for all of the Titles offered in the XV format of the game!”.

As the winning try was confirmed via the TMO replay on the giant screen, and the complex erupted with glorious echoes of joy and jubilation from the men (and women) who bleed green, in chorus with the general rugby loving patrons, the Colombo sky right above the playing field opened up wide to send down a heavy instant downpour, in order to pacify and drown the tears rolling down from the astonished and deceived young Lions, who have only themselves to blame for hurling the book of laws into oblivion.

 

Result: Pathana beat Trinity 12-9

 

(The analyst can be reached at: [email protected].)

Daily FT Tactical Analyst Arun Pillai sets record straight

I am an IT Systems Architect by profession and my distinct expertise lies on performance tuning, by finding bottlenecks in ERP Applications, Databases and Server Hardware. It is this decades of analytical experience I bring into Rugby with the sole purpose of uplifting the standards in schools rugby, whilst also promoting the five values of rugby. Winning the hearts of the readership by words of praises to their respective Alma Maters, and by sugar coating negativities is certainly not on the cards. Therefore, the core objective of my analysis is to point out shortcomings, especially of the weaker sides.

My match previews focus on tactics the weak sides should consider to level up to, or topple the better sides. In case both teams are equally balanced and the result cannot be determined beforehand, then focus shall remain impartial. Similarly, the game reviews chiefly explore the shortcomings of the losing side for them to improve those areas before their next game. Praising the winning team, other than for highlighting key achievements, is not part of my goals. Therefore, such write ups can never be balanced as the focus is neither reporting nor pleasing.

My write-ups do not resemble or follow any others that are published in contemporary times, and are not to be confused with sports reporting. My analysis is presented subjectively with frequent literary contexts, that can be categorised as “Literary Sports Journalism”, where readers will find varying unfamiliar tones represented in the language, such as amazement, curiosity, humour, sarcasm and ridicule, that are all blended into an opinionated write-up. This could be quite new to readers, and often difficult to comprehend for those who are at the receiving end, especially when some matters have to be expressed with some degree of harshness. 

While the ideas presented are not, and cannot be the absolute truth but are merely opinions, readers of varying degree of knowledge, experience, comprehension, expectations and mind-sets may or may not agree with what is being stated, and there is absolutely no necessity to do so. It should be duly noted that when behaviour of school players that violates the five values of rugby is highlighted with appropriate tones and suitable metaphors, it is directly intended for the personnel who are responsible for keeping them behaving in a humanely dignified manner.

Finally I would like to state for the record that my sentiments are never influenced by anyone, not even the Daily FT Editor. For those readers who are cynical and suspect certain hidden agendas, I would like to disclose them at this time. My one and only hidden agenda is to instil the five values of rugby, and quite vehemently as well.