Some hope for cricket 

The appointment of Eran Wickremaratne as Chairman of the Sri Lanka Cricket Restructuring Committee marks a rare and much-needed moment of clarity in the long, troubled history of cricket administration in the country. For decades, Sri Lanka Cricket has been an institution burdened by allegations of corruption, political interference, and mismanagement. These systemic failures have not only eroded public trust but have also contributed directly to the steady decline of standards at both the domestic and international levels.

From the glory days of the 1996 World Cup victory to the emergence of world-class players who commanded global respect, the game has been deeply intertwined with our country’s identity. Yet, in recent years, that legacy has been undermined by an administrative culture that often appeared more concerned with personal gain and political patronage than with the development of the game.

For far too long, Sri Lanka Cricket has operated like a cartel, dominated by a small group of individuals, many of whom lack meaningful experience in the sport itself. This disconnect between administrators and the realities of the game has led to poor decision-making, inadequate investment in grassroots development, and a failure to nurture emerging talent. The consequences are evident in the inconsistent performances at the international level, a weakened domestic structure, and a growing sense of disillusionment among players and fans alike.

Against this backdrop, the appointment of Eran Wickremaratne stands out as a promising shift. Wickremaratne brings a rare combination of qualities that are urgently needed in Sri Lanka Cricket today. As a former cricketer, he understands the game from the inside. As a respected banker, he possesses the financial acumen and the management skills required to bring transparency and accountability to an institution plagued by questionable practices. And as a politician with a reputation for integrity, he represents a departure from the entrenched culture of opportunism that has long defined cricket administration.

Equally important is the composition of the interim committee itself. The inclusion of competent professionals, former cricketers, and experienced managers suggests a more holistic and informed approach to governance. This is not merely a symbolic change but a move that has the potential to reshape the structural foundations of Sri Lanka Cricket. If given the autonomy and support they require, this team could begin the difficult but necessary process of rebuilding the institution from the ground up.

However, the political response to Wickremaratne’s appointment has been disappointing. The decision by his own party to penalise him for accepting this role reflects a troubling tendency to view even national service through a partisan lens. At a time when Sri Lanka Cricket desperately needs reform, such reactions only serve to reinforce the very politicisation that has contributed to its decline. This episode also raises broader questions about leadership and priorities within the main Opposition Samagi Jana Balawegaya led by Sajith Premadasa. When capable individuals are discouraged from taking on roles that serve the national interest, it signals a failure to rise above narrow considerations.

Ultimately, the success of this initiative will depend not only on Wickremaratne and his team but also on the willingness of all stakeholders to support meaningful reform. Structural change will not happen overnight. It will require patience, transparency, and a sustained commitment to good governance. But for the first time in a long while, there is a sense that Sri Lanka Cricket could be moving in the right direction.