Hayleys PLC obtains enjoining order against Wimal Weerawansa

Wednesday, 10 June 2026 06:33 -     - {{hitsCtrl.values.hits}}

  • In relation to making defamatory statements

The District Court of Kaduwela yesterday issued an enjoining order against former MP Wimal Weerawansa on an application preferred by Hayleys PLC. 

Hayleys PLC set out in the Plaint that, being one of the largest conglomerates in Sri Lanka, Hayleys PLC has a reputation within Sri Lanka and internationally and, further, the company’s Board of Directors consists of esteemed individuals in the country. It was further set out that Hayleys PLC had garnered immense goodwill within Sri Lanka as a household name and is operating in many sectors including automobiles, power, agriculture etc. 

The Plaintiff, in the Plaint set out that in such backdrop, the Defendant, a former Parliamentarian, had on four separate occasions during the months of February, April, and May 2026, through social media platforms and on the “Salakuna” program on Hiru TV, directly and/or indirectly referred to Hayleys PLC and in a defamatory, untruthful and baseless manner made references to Hayleys PLC, Kingsbury PLC, Hayleys’ automobile arm, its Jetstar agency, logistics subsidiary, renewable energy subsidiaries, and  Hayleys Retail which had recently branched into supermarkets. Further, the Plaintiff had set out that the Defendant had either directly, by identifying the Plaintiff by name, through its subsidiaries or by identifying the Co- Chairman or Chairman had identified the Plaintiff company in the public domain and had repeatedly tarnished the reputation of the Plaintiff Company. 

The Plaintiff, as per the Plaint, had sent out a Letter of Demand to the Defendant on or around 25th May 2026 and even after the receipt of the Letter of Demand, the Defendant came on the ‘Salakuna’ program and continuously further defamed the Plaintiff in an untruthful manner by referring to and identifying the members of the Board of the Plaintiff company and subsidiary companies of the Plaintiff company. The Plaintiff in such circumstances, as per the Plaint, set out that irremediable harm and mischief will be caused to the Plaintiff if the Court does not grant an order preventing the Defendant from further disseminating statements that are defamatory and untrue. In addition to the enjoining order, the Plaintiff had sought cumulative damages from the Defendant totalling to Rs. 6 billion for damage to the reputation of the Plaintiff. 

Being satisfied with the submissions and the pleadings, the District Court of Kaduwela issued the enjoining order against Wimal Weerawansa preventing him from further making and/or publishing the statements concerning the Plaintiff which had been effected and/or from further making and/or publishing, disseminating, communicating to the public, or otherwise conveying any false, misleading, defamatory statement relating to the Plaintiff, or any other defamatory statement concerning the Plaintiff.

Matter is to be called in Court on 23 June 2026. 

Counsel Nishan Sydney Premathiratne appears with Shenali Dias and Ishara Jayakodiarachchi for the Plaintiff instructed by Chanuka Ekanayake.

 

COMMENTS