Texas House passes bill banning TSA ‘groping’

Friday, 20 May 2011 00:01 - - {{hitsCtrl.values.hits}}

The Texas House of Representatives last week approved a bill that would make invasive pat-downs at Texas airports a crime, after a former Miss USA said she felt “molested” at the Dallas/Fort Worth airport last month.

Transportation Security Administration agents could be charged with a misdemeanor crime, face a $4,000 fine and one year in jail under the measure.

The proposal would classify any airport inspection that “touches the anus, sexual organ, buttocks, or breast of another person including through the clothing, or touches the other person in a manner that would be offensive to a reasonable person” as an offence of sexual harassment under official oppression.

The measure’s author, Republican David Simpson, said: “Indecent groping searches when innocent travellers are seeking access to airports and public buildings would be outlawed under this bill.”

The bill needs a final vote from the House before it would go to the Senate. “This has to do with dignity in travel,” Simpson said.

TSA spokesman Luis Casanova said he could not comment on pending legislation. He said just 3 percent of the travelling public is subjected to pat-downs.

TSA pat-downs have drawn some high-profile criticism, including from former Miss USA Susie Castillo, who said in a widely-viewed online video that she felt “molested” by a pat-down at Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport last month.

The agency reviewed Castillo’s incident and found that the officer followed proper procedures, said TSA assistant administrator Kristine Lee.

“We wish we lived in a world where security procedures at airports weren’t necessary but that just isn’t the case,” Lee said in a statement.

Since the Transportation Security Administration initiated tighter airport security measures in late summer — including new X-ray body-scan machines that render subjects virtually naked and intimate pat-downs for those who decline to go through them — some airline passengers have taken offence at what they consider unreasonable invasions of privacy.