CB sets record straight on validity of Governor’s appointment and currency notes issuance

Thursday, 25 June 2015 01:09 -     - {{hitsCtrl.values.hits}}

The Central Bank in a statement yesterday informed the general public of the position on the validity of the appointment of the present Governor, and validity of the currency notes issued by the bank on4 February 2015, in view of frivolous allegations appearing in certain media.

It is reiterated that the appointment of Lakshman Arjuna Mahendran as the Governor of the Central Bank has been done in compliance with law as well as the established practice. 



The provisions of Section 11 of the Monetary Law Act specifically sets out the circumstances where a person becomes disqualified for appointment as the governor, and the present Governor’s appointment has not been tainted with any such disqualification.

It is specifically stated that the citizenship or nationality of an individual has never been a relevant consideration for appointment of a governor from the time John Exter, a US national, was appointed the first governor of the Central Bank of Sri Lanka.

The Central Bank of Sri Lanka is cognisant of the tenuous and malicious assertions on the validity of the currency notes bearing the signature of the present Governor. In this respect, it is pertinent to note that provisions of Section 53 (2) of the Monetary Law Act requires every currency note to bear the signatures in facsimile of the Minister in charge of the subject of Finance and of the Governor of the Central Bank, and statement that it has been issued on behalf of the Government of Sri Lanka. 

Every currency note issued by the Central Bank shall, according to section 52 of the Act, be legal tender in Sri Lanka for the payment of any amount. Accordingly, the general public is guaranteed that currency notes issued by the Central Bank of Sri Lanka bearing the signatures of the Governor of the Central Bank of Sri Lanka and the Minister of Finance with the date 4 February 2015are legal tender for the payment of any amount in Sri Lanka. Validity of such notes has not been affected in any manner whatsoever by the specious concerns raised by persons with ulterior motives.

COMMENTS