Thursday Dec 12, 2024
Thursday Dec 12, 2024
Wednesday, 25 October 2017 01:30 - - {{hitsCtrl.values.hits}}
By Uditha Jayasinghe
Progress on as much as 51% of the major Budget proposals made for 2017 remains undisclosed to the public creating an opaque space for policymakers and uncertainty for the private sector, research from a prominent think tank showed yesterday.
The analysis of 2017 Budget proposals by Verite Research showed that less than half of 37 major proposals amounting to Rs. 116,910 million in public funds covering 24 government institutions could be tracked by the public.
The research, which covered policy implementation over the first six months of 2017, ran into repeated roadblocks as authorities refused to share information even after Right to Information (RTI) applications had been filed.
The full details of the findings can be accessed at www.budgetpromises .org, which is the latest online platform launched by Verite Research on Tuesday.
“The Budget that is presented in Parliament is somewhat different from what is implemented over the next year. There is a real problem because analysis, perspectives and policies get shaped around these but actually do not happen, that means the country may be having wrong expectations and having the wrong kind of analysis in terms of understanding government action,” said Verite Research Executive Director Dr. Nishan de Mel.
“So this platform is something that attempts to help everyone to understand how the Government has moved forward on promises it has made in the Budget.”
Verite Research Assistant Analyst Nilangika Fernando noted that of the proposals 14% were removed and 32% were lagging behind schedule and only 3% or one proposal was on track and ahead of schedule. The 51% of proposals where no information could be obtained was worth Rs. 67 billion, she added.
The one proposal ahead of schedule was, according to Verité, the road improvement in rural areas carried out by the Local Government and Provincial Councils Ministry, which was allocated Rs. 4,500 million by the Budget.
“Attention is usually focused only on the Budget speech but there is a need to understand how much is implemented. Even though under the last Budget there was a proposal for ministry websites to voluntarily share information on capital projects, very few complied,” she said.
Even though ministries are expected to hand over progress reports on their projects to the Finance Ministry only 14 of the key ministries had done so and even fewer had shared their policy statements, procurement details and other documents online. A few institutions and ministries had cooperated when they were approached by the research team but gathering information had still been a challenge, Fernando emphasised.
“Out of the 54 RTI applications filed, only 15 got a response within the stipulated time period and 16 received a response only after submitting an appeal. The remaining have not received a response to date.”
Interestingly, the Information Communication Technology Agency (ICTA) under the Ministry of Telecommunication and Digital Infrastructure was among the most responsive and had a large number of major proposals accounting for about Rs. 75 billion. The Housing and Construction, Power and Energy, Industry and Commerce, Fisheries and Irrigation and Water Management ministries were the most transparent, according to the study. The Fisheries Ministry in particular was praised for voluntarily sharing progress reports and other documents online.
Many other top ministries, however, fared badly. These included the Education, Law and Order and Defence ministries, even though the request for information from the latter had nothing to do with national security and focused only on the pensions of disabled war veterans. The National Policies and Economic Affairs Ministry, which is headed by Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe, and the Agriculture Ministry, which is held by Duminda Dissanayake, were also labelled “closed” or “obstructed” by the platform.
