Government mortgages women on behalf of microfinance companies

By Collective of Women Affected 

by Microfinance

The Government that came into power pledging to abolish all microfinance debt has failed to keep its promises. 

Moreover, the Government has also been unsuccessful in making a sufficient intervention to facilitate women suffering from an escalated microfinance crisis in the backdrop of the COVID-19 pandemic. 

In a context where standards of living of all people affected by microfinance have been deteriorating, the Collective of Women Affected by Microfinance called for a Satyagraha on 08 March 2021, to raise awareness of the gravity of the problem and to caution the larger society of new dangers to come. Again, the government failed to respond to the demands of the Collective during the Satyagraha which lasted for 55 days in front of the State Monument in Hingurakgoda, Polonnaruwa. 

As the national collective of women affected by microfinance, we convey our displeasure and opposition to the Government for safeguarding the microfinance companies responsible for our financial catastrophe while misleading women and all people affected by the microfinance crisis.

We have been illustrating how all governments hitherto have facilitated the finance companies to profit from the livelihoods and labour issues of women instead of addressing these problems through a national economic development plan. Unpayable debt dumped on the women and their families bear witness to the failure of the government policy. 

We have been raising consciousness on the nexus between our livelihoods, suicides, dispossession, displacement, domestic violence, family disputes and the problem of over-indebtedness for over half a decade since 2017. We have communicated to the Government, the Central Bank, the Ministry of Finance, key political leaders in the Government as well as the public repeatedly on this matter. 

However, the political leadership, as well as the policymakers, appear to be deaf and blind as they believe that new loan schemes would solve the current microfinance crisis. They have discarded our lived experiences, confirmation of the failure of debt-driven entrepreneurship and self-employment. 

We will not fall from the frying pan to the fire by following the failed government policy of debt-driven entrepreneurship and self-employment.

Loss of income and increase in cost-of-living triggered by the economic crisis that the country is facing as well as the crisis in agriculture at present, have precluded the ability of indebted women to pay back their debt.

Concerns arising from the current context:

1. Persistent collection of debt drives women to danger

a. Microfinance borrowers engaged in livelihoods related to agriculture, fisheries and the informal economy do not enjoy guaranteed wages or retirement benefits. Hence, they are more susceptible to climate change, economic instability, sickness, and accidents. COVID-19 pandemic illustrates many incidents where women were forced into more hazardous forms of debt as they fail to meet debt repayment owing to the collapse of their regular sources of income.

b. Women borrowers of microfinance record incidents of losing their savings, household

goods, gold, and land in the process of debt repayment.

c. Women often succumbed to domestic violence arising from household disputes as they prioritise debt repayment over other household expenses related to food, education, and health care.

d. A 2018 report by the Independent Expert on Foreign Debt and Human Rights to the UN Human Rights Council Juan Pablo Bohoslavski documented that 2.4 million out of the 2.8 million ensnared in the microfinance debt trap were women.

e. News reports over the years as well as national suicide records with the Department of Police account for over 200 suicides related to microfinance.

2. Litigation against women failing to repay

a. Finance companies and microfinance companies have been misusing the judiciary mechanism to coerce women to repay unpayable debt.

b. Some companies are threatening women in remote areas with litigation in courts in Colombo.

c. Most of the borrowers cannot bear lawyers’ fees. Many cannot afford to travel to appear in the courts. As a result, microfinance victims do not get a just hearing or legal representation. Almost all the cases are determined favourably to the finance companies.

3. Permanent financial disenfranchisement       

a. Borrowers unable to repay are delisted in the Credit Information Bureau (CRIB) which bar them from accessing other financial sources in the formal financial sector. 

b. A majority of the microfinance borrowers listed in the CRIB are excluded from accessing financial concessions provided in line with the COVID-19 pandemic.

c. Denying microfinance borrowers access to formal financial markets directly exposes them to precarious forms of finance in the informal market.

4. Pressure to repay debt compels women into anti-social activities.

a. In many villages, lack of income-generating opportunities has pushed women into prostitution.

b. Debt burden has negatively affected children’s education and psychological wellbeing of the family.

A year ago, through the Satyagraha, we declared that we choose life over debt which has been fatal to women. We have decided to stop repaying unjust debt. We will not borrow from exploitative finance companies either. We urge all 2.8 million women victims of microfinance all around Sri Lanka to refuse microfinance companies lending at prohibitive rates. 

Let us join in hands to launch an organised alternative development mechanism that caters to our development needs. 

Lastly, the Government and the politicians who we have voted to power should open their eyes and ears and contribute towards an economic development accountable to the people.