Being true Sri Lankans

Tuesday, 5 January 2016 00:01 - - {{hitsCtrl.values.hits}}

ONE of the biggest wins when President Maithripala Sirisena came to power almost a year ago was the almost instantaneous reduction in extremist activities and the stifling of organisations that championed separatism. Yet, as the first anniversary of the “Yahapalanaya” victory nears, there are provocative incidents that point to the once-quashed divisive sentiments rearing their heads, which is all the more unsettling because the top members of the Government have chosen to stay silent.

Social media is agog with photos of Muslim households that had “Sinhale” spray painted on their private property. It is not only these incidents but the logo is appearing in other ways, on social media and even as car stickers. Other public officials including Deputy Foreign Minister Dr. Harsha de Silva have suggested the existence of a group that is seeking to increase ethnic tensions. To his credit, the minister was one of the first people connected to the Government to come out in condemnation and it is even more heartening that average citizens have censured the incidents roundly, even going so far as to offer to pay to have the defaced walls and gates repainted.

The vibe, one can argue, is more positive this time around as more people have the power to speak out against extremism and it is not blatantly protected by the State. But the saddening fact is that it happened at all. Also, the State has not stepped up its response in making it clear to all parties that such action is against the law and the principles upheld by the State. Undoubtedly, such a message should come from the highest possible authority in the land, which in this case would be the President.

President Maithripala Sirisena has been put on the spot more emphatically as the spray painting spree came just days after a spirited statement censuring the now-infamous Enrique Iglesias concert. His comments about upholding the culture of Sri Lanka and calling on organisers to be whipped with “stingray tails,” has not only been embedded in popular cult history but also put the country on the international map. The events of Nugegoda that clearly violated the rights and laws of the land as well as precepts of Buddhism enshrined in non-violence and acceptance of differences should elicit a statement from the top rungs of Government.

Pledges to the UN to promote reconciliation notwithstanding, the Head of State has to remember that he was elected by all the people of Sri Lanka; to serve, protect and champion what is right. The President and the Government have a responsibility of paramount importance to remember that Sri Lanka is a nation that should be based on inclusiveness, tolerance and understanding. If the leaders of this nation do not lead by example, then they open the way for others to undermine these precious cornerstones of justice and peace.

The former government played separatist politics and paid the price. So the Sirisena administration must remember that while revamping Constitutions and ratifying international law is important, the most impact is made by how they respond to everyday acts of intolerance, prejudice and bigotry.