Consistent policies

The absence of national policies on key sectors has been bemoaned many times in Sri Lanka. Policy makers of the previous Government this week praised a decision by the Government to keep the National Export Strategy (NES) intact as it was formulated after much consultation from different stakeholders. This could be the starting point of establishing national policies that could get bi-partisan support so that the economy can develop insulated from vibrant politics. 

Governments of all hues have been criticised repeatedly for not having national plans. This is extremely difficult in a country such as Sri Lanka where democratic institutions, public sector, media and civil society are too weak to hold the powers at the top accountable for promises made. 

There are also no institutions dedicated to apolitical policymaking where bipartisan support is given to one policy and successive governments follow it, as done in some parts of the world. At the core of this need is data-based policymaking so that decisions are made to reflect ground realties and the public have the capacity to dismantle statements of politicians and understand the true situation of what can be achieved and why.

Everyone will agree that a government has to come up with a clear and coherent set of ideas — a vision — and use available resources and instruments as efficiently as possible to produce the results that citizens expect. The risk-taking involved in articulating and defining a progressive vision for the future is what defines great leadership. Achieving that vision as effectively as possible requires effective risk management — in other words, good governance. This is the golden goal for the public. 

In defining a national vision, leaders employ their ideologies and are elected, or not, accordingly. However, the successful implementation of that vision cannot be ideologically driven. It requires sound public policy that is transparent, accountable, and effective.

The best way to improve government is to improve the government’s ability to manage risk and produce results. This could be achieved by a shift toward data-based policymaking. While this may sound self-evident, the lack of good statistical data has been a long-felt shortcoming in Sri Lanka where even at the Cabinet-level, decisions are made based on belief systems or political ideologies or for personal gain rather than evidence and fact. Whether it is education, healthcare, housing, power generation, exports, investment, managing cost of living or debt repayment, bipartisan policymaking based on data can work for public interest. 

Increased investment in a national statistical office and other data-gathering institutions is therefore essential. This is a point that bears repeating. For governments, the paucity of good data is further complicated by the weakness of institutions, particularly the civil service. This is exacerbated by the fact that the poor public perception of civil service results in them not being given enough authority to carry out policies consistently. This means that it is even more important that the civil service has access to the necessary resources to guide its decision-making.  Data-driven policymaking would also have the additional benefit of allowing for a more rational public debate on sensitive topics. There are many ways data can be used, and how it could influence markets, services and industries needs to be a collective or at least a sensible decision. Ensuring that policymaking is done with data is one way to ensure political leaders are doing the job they are selected for and they continue to do it past their terms in office.