Monday Oct 27, 2025
Wednesday, 25 June 2014 00:00 - - {{hitsCtrl.values.hits}}
Pathana has produced champion outfits in recent times with the resources available to them and have proved that hard work, dedication, self belief and the insatiable desire to win are key ingredients. They may not have the luxuries accorded to certain school kids in terms of nutrition and training facilities but what they have achieved with the resources available is certainly laudable.
TCK finished in the number two slot and their style of play and brand of rugby is totally different yet effective. Their risk appetite is rather low and they depend on doing the basics right most of the time which has yielded the desired results. Unlike Pathana, they play some rather hyped games, in terms of the Bradby which to some is the epitome of all rugby games in the season. Whilst this game is rich in tradition and both schools have produced some outstanding ruggerites as well as academics it is not necessarily the best of games of the season. To this extent some of the schools who have blossomed late into the rugby arena are at a distinct disadvantage with no such traditional rivalries to speak of. For TCK, Ratwatte was brilliant throughout the season and his ability to dictate terms in the three quarter line was great. Moving him to the role of centre is a waste of talent and he must occupy his natural slot of No. 10.
KCK was definitely a surprise package this season and few would have given them credit to be in the top four at the end of the season. However their performance was steady throughout the season and in certain games they did throttle their opponents into submission. Their slip up against Trinity in the latter stages cost them a higher spot and their performance in the final game was forgettable. Their style was pretty simple and given an opportunity they would play safe and then run the ball only when they were in the opposition half. Thus their attitude of safety first whilst having its positives also meant that they were limited in their scoring opportunities. The No. 8 cannot afford to bind close to the flanker when attempting a break from the base of the scrum and not hope to run into his own flanker. This type of incident cost them a penalty in the final game against Pathana.
Much was expected of RC under the tutelage of the former Petes coach. Other than for a couple of games, especially the second leg of the Bradby, which had no bearing on the league, they failed to deliver as expected. They had a good outing against the Petes and rolled all over them to victory. They definitely had a talented bunch, but, on more occasions than not, their three quarters fluffed the hard won possession of the forwards. The pack was pretty dominant in most games and the bulk of the scoring opportunities were created by the marauding forwards. A lack of a coordinated team play cost them some games and they would have learnt that lesson well. Their No. 8 had a good season and needs to have some of the rough edges polished as is with an uncut diamond.
The Petes were disappointing in general with injuries to key players and the inclusion of half fit players in the starting line up. The Petes saved the best for the last and their creditable performances against eventual league winners, Pathana, TCK and Kingswood is commendable. They definitely blossomed late and maybe left it tad too late to get into a rhythm and thus missed out on finishing in a higher spot. Without doubt they have a match winner in Dixon and the need to harness his talent further will be paramount in the future. The coaching staff lacked imagination and if that is not fixed, they will languish in the league in the years to come.
(The writer can be reached via [email protected])