Home / TOP STORY/ Decision on Opp. leader this week

Decision on Opp. leader this week


Comments / {{hitsCtrl.values.hits}} Views / Wednesday, 8 August 2018 00:00


 

  • Speaker to announce determination before Friday 
  • P’ment heats up over JO demand to make Dinesh new Opposition leader 
  • Dinesh slams UPFA Gen. Secy as ‘incompetent’ after he backs Sampanthan to remain 
  • TNA challenges JO to leave UPFA, says position cannot be given to party which holds Cabinet positions  
  • JVP backs TNA, contends if JO leaves UPFA coalition Govt. would dissolve   

By Ashwin Hemmathagama – Our Lobby Correspondent

Speaker Karu Jayasuriya informed Parliament yesterday that the final decision on the Opposition leader position would be given before Friday after his decision was discussed and agreed during the party leaders meeting held last afternoon.

Before reaching the agreement at the party leaders meeting, the UPFA Joint Opposition lawmakers were highly critical of both the Government and Speaker Karu Jayasuriya for not removing Tamil National Alliance (TNA) leader MP Rajavarothiam Sampanthan and establishing Joint Opposition parliamentary group leader MP Dinesh Gunawardena as the new Opposition Leader.

Immediately after the moving of petitions and questions for oral answers, MP Gunawardena was seen on his feet making a point of order by raising the issue of appointing an Opposition Leader from his group. He requested a fresh determination by the Speaker on the post of Opposition Leader, considering the latest changes to the number of lawmakers in the Government and the Opposition benches.

MP Gunawardena in his notes identified the UPFA General Secretary Mahinda Amaraweera as an “incompetent, ignorant, inefficient General Secretary of a party.” He made this comment with reference to the reply letter of Amaraweera to the Speaker in which he informed that the UPFA did not want any change in the post of Opposition Leader.

During the ensuing heated debate lawmakers from both the Government and the UPFA Joint Opposition justified their positions bringing in prior examples and parliamentary traditions.

In the absence of MP Sampanthan, TNA MP M.A. Sumanthiran challenged the JO to leave the UPFA and sit independently and seek the main Opposition leader position. 

“The Leader of Opposition post cannot be held by a person who belongs to a party that has members in the Cabinet. The UPFA Chairman, its General Secretary and over 20 members are members of the Cabinet and are part of the Executive. It will be a mockery to have yet another UPFA MP sitting as the Opposition Leader as well,” he stressed.

Agreeing with the TNA’s remarks, JVP MP Bimal Rathnayake held that the entire Cabinet should first resign if an UPFA member is to get the post of Opposition Leader because there can no longer be a national government after that. 

“The number of ministers was increased under the pretext of forming a national government. If the UPFA is given the Opposition Leader post then the number of ministers should be limited to 30 under the 19th Amendment to the Constitution,” he argued.     

Meanwhile, MP Dullas Allahapperuma noted the 70 MPs of the JO represent 31% of the total 225 MPs in Parliament, while 16 TNA MPs represent only 7%.

However, the backbenchers of the UNP challenged the JO to resign from the UPFA and seek the position they want. UNP MP Mujibar Rahuman said: “The entire issue of Opposition Leader is a result of an internal rift within the UPFA and there is no point in wasting Parliament’s time over it. If you want to claim the Opposition Leader post, the best thing to do is to press the President and your General Secretary to sit in the Opposition.” 

UNP MP Thushara Indunil said the UNP backbenchers would also cross over to the Opposition and demand the rights and privileges given to an opposition group if this trend continued.  

Chief Opposition Whip and JVP Leader Anura Dissanayake suggested that the JO could rightfully claim the Opposition Leader post if they, who claim to have 70 MPs, grab the power of the UPFA executive committee, defeating the 23 members aligned with the Government.

 


Share This Article


DISCLAIMER:

1. All comments will be moderated by the Daily FT Web Editor.

2. Comments that are abusive, obscene, incendiary, defamatory or irrelevant will not be published.

3. We may remove hyperlinks within comments.

4. Kindly use a genuine email ID and provide your name.

5. Spamming the comments section under different user names may result in being blacklisted.

COMMENTS

Today's Columnists

Courting democracy; Housing disaster?

Thursday, 15 November 2018

A small step was taken by a sovereign court the day before yesterday. It was a giant leap for the supremacy of the Constitution over all three arms of government in a recently benighted Sri Lanka. As well as being the tangible proof of intra-governme


Sri Lanka’s Judiciary in its finest hour

Thursday, 15 November 2018

“We must never forget that the only real source of power we as judges can tap is the respect of the people” –Justice Thurgood Marshall


When scholars turn slayers of reason

Thursday, 15 November 2018

“… I think, that the intellectual is an individual endowed with a faculty of representing, embodying, articulating a message, a view, an attitude, philosophy or opinion to, as well as for, a public. And this role has an edge to it, and cannot be


A stable democracy is a prerequisite for the wellbeing of Sri Lankans

Thursday, 15 November 2018

In Sri Lanka, despite the complexity of overlapping policies, the slow pace in implementing economic policies has been of central concern in the past few years. The current political state in Sri Lanka poses a series of e


Columnists More