Home / Rohantha Athukorala/ Sri Lanka must focus on quality of exports rather than value

Sri Lanka must focus on quality of exports rather than value


Comments / {{hitsCtrl.values.hits}} Views / Wednesday, 16 January 2019 00:00


 

The most attractive export of Sri Lanka is tourism, poised for $ 8 b by 2025

 


 

Whilst Sri Lanka needs to be commended on the exports value of $ 17 billion that was achieved last year (the numbers include merchandise and export of services), a point to note us that Sri Lanka is ranked the lowest in our part of the world for new product development in the overall export basket. This analysis was done by the Harvard Diagnostic study done in 2018. 

 

Sri Lanka – only $ 0.1 b

Based on the Harvard Diagnostic study in 2018, Sri Lanka has launched only seven new export products generating $ 0.1 billion in the period 2000-2015, whilst China has generated $ 331 billion with 76 new products.

There are other counties like Thailand, Vietnam, Philippines and Malaysia also registering new product development contributing positively to the countries’ export revenue as per Appendix 1. We also see that countries that are linking research to understanding the global consumer are achieving above 3% of their overall export revenue from new products. Sadly Sri Lanka is below 0.5% which is does not augur well for a country that targeting $37 billion in exports by the year 2025. 

This clearly highlights the weakness of Sri Lanka’s export agenda as against competitors in the region. This has resulted due to a strategic development of a new product pipeline not being there or not being formalised.

In simple words, it can be said that Sri Lanka has not identified the changing global consumer and changed its export product mix to the changing consumer landscape which needs to be addressed even now.

The Harvard Diagnostic Study of 2018 also revealed that almost 76% of the export products are low GDP contributing products as against countries like China, Thailand and Vietnam, which have strategically developed their export product baskets where low GDP merchandise accounts for only 34% of the business as per appendix 2.

A point to note is that countries that are moving towards industrialisation tend to move from exporting Apparel to ‘Machinery and Electrical’. For instance Philippines has an export skew of 60%, Vietnam at 36% and China at 46% as per Appendix 2. 

We see how Sri Lanka is lagging behind at 4% exports contributed by Machinery and Electrical, which is where reforms must happen in Sri Lanka. This calls for a stronger linkage between university and the private sector with the backing of infrastructure support by the Government. 

This is the reason why the International Trade Center (ITC) Executive Director Arancha Gonzalez mentioned at the launch stating: “Sri Lanka needs to move away from the cosmetic side of exports to real hardware changes though policy reforms if we are to make Sri Lanka competitive in the global export arena.”

Now the challenge is how this can be driven with strong leadership at a time when the focus is Provincial Council elections and Presidential elections.

 

SL’s FTA – struggling at 20%

Whilst we know that the future of export growth is with trade agreements, the issue that that the private sector has on FTAs is that, the first Free Trade Agreement signed in South Asia, the Indo-Lanka FTA with India, is struggling even after 15 years. Whilst overall exports are touching $17 billion the Indo-Lanka FTA is yet generating between 0.5-0.8 billion dollars in exports. This is also from basic raw material driven items and not from the strategic sectors like Apparel or Tea.

This performance comes in the backdrop of the much-publicised middle income customer base of over 400 million and an economy growing at above 7% plus. The key strategic sectors of Apparel and Tea are struggling with the FTA utilisation below 20%. Some companies which have ventured out in the confectionery business have got burnt, which ultimately led to the Sri Lankan chambers issuing a statement that until the FTA anomalies are corrected Sri Lanka must not purse the ETCA economic partnership agreement. 

There have been many conferences where the key the issues have been highlighted but the consensus now is that it is only a political intervention that can break the deadlock than chamber discussions.

India’s view on the status quo is slightly different. It believes that the anomalies of the current Indo-Lanka FTA will be corrected when ECTA is implemented. In my view, in fairness to Sri Lanka exporters we have to see some course correction on the current trade agreement before we ink new trade linkages. The logic being that we need to see the political will for change before the private sector invests money to drive business. 

 

Conclusion 

What Sri Lanka requires now is not the debate why we highlight exports at 17 billion (together with Service exports) whilst Central Bank data continues to report the traditional merchandising export value of some 13 billion dollars.

What Sri Lanka requires is to build stronger linkages between the universities and typical export marketing companies whilst the Government supports the industries with funding for new product development. 

Sri Lanka must increase the exports of Machinery and Electronics from the current 4% contribution to 20% by 2025. We must move to exporting products that generate higher GDP value to the economy. It is only then that we can say the ITC-driven National Export Strategy (NES) has been brought to life. 

[The writer was the seventh Chairman of the Sri Lanka Export Development Board and then went on to head the Government’s key policymaking body, the National Council for Economic Development (NCED).]


Share This Article

Facebook Twitter


DISCLAIMER:

1. All comments will be moderated by the Daily FT Web Editor.

2. Comments that are abusive, obscene, incendiary, defamatory or irrelevant will not be published.

3. We may remove hyperlinks within comments.

4. Kindly use a genuine email ID and provide your name.

5. Spamming the comments section under different user names may result in being blacklisted.

COMMENTS

Today's Columnists

Presidential Election 2019: The ‘Promised Land’ awaits us?

Wednesday, 13 November 2019

Most observers will probably agree that Gotabaya Rajapaksa’s campaign has edged Sajith Premadasa’s for its drive, organisation and area/region specific campaign promises and slogans. The Rajapaksa campaign has not resorted to gimmicks such a bugg


Elections, Voltaire, Candide and optimism

Wednesday, 13 November 2019

Voltaire (Francois-Marie Arouet-1694- 1778) was one of the key writers to have inspired the ideals of the French revolution, that history- changing explosion in 18 Century Europe. Politically, socially and intellectually, after 1789, the world would


Election manifestos and implementation plans

Wednesday, 13 November 2019

I have been under pressure from friends and erstwhile colleagues to comment on the election manifestos of the presidential candidates, at least of the three main contenders. My feeling is that a lot of thought has gone into their preparation and the


Right choice for president, Sajith or Gotabaya?

Wednesday, 13 November 2019

In a few days Sri Lanka will have a new leader. After a disappointing term with the “Yahapalanaya” policies, many of whom would look for new hope from the two most likely contenders, namely Gotabaya Rajapaksa (GR) and Sajith Premadasa (SP). At t


Columnists More