Home / Opinion and Issues/ The drivel from Gotabaya’s surrogates

The drivel from Gotabaya’s surrogates

Comments / {{hitsCtrl.values.hits}} Views / Tuesday, 8 October 2019 00:00

By Taylor Dibbert

In a recent opinion piece, Raj Gonsalkorale revises history and essentially argues that concerns about a Gotabaya Rajapaksa presidency are baseless (‘Who is afraid of Gota? The law of the land is not’).

He writes that “[t]he country will be safe from anyone and everyone if the law of the land is independently and justly applied to everyone irrespective of who they are, and law enforcement personnel act independently, without fear or favour, and importantly, are allowed to do so.” 

Unfortunately, the impartial application of the rule of law is precisely what did not happen when the Rajapaksas were in power. And, lawlessness would almost certainly be a prominent feature of a future Rajapaksa regime.

Gotabaya Rajapaksa

During the reign of the Rajapaksas, the rule of law deteriorated, and institutional norms eroded precipitously. Sri Lanka became a scary place. The repression of dissent was truly ruthless. A climate of fear became pervasive.

It’s also odd that, in the same article where he talks about the importance of the rule of law, Gonsalkorale indicates that he doesn’t really have a problem with “extra judicial activity” if that occurs under the auspices of fighting terrorism. So, slaughtering Tamil civilians and committing war crimes or crimes against humanity would be fine for Gonsalkorale. He is supposedly a strong proponent of the rule of law, except for all the times when he isn’t. How convenient!

When Gotabaya Rajapaksa served as secretary to the ministry of defence, authoritarianism, human rights violations and impunity were rampant. These transgressions have been well-documented, as have the horrific violations that occurred during the end of the civil war. The bottom line is that the Rajapaksas don’t believe that that law applies to them. 

Rajapaksa surrogates will only become more vocal in the weeks ahead and Gotabaya is obviously viewed as the favourite in November. Nevertheless, false, intellectually dishonest and misleading characterisations of his record should be viewed as the politically motivated tripe that they are.

Share This Article

Facebook Twitter


1. All comments will be moderated by the Daily FT Web Editor.

2. Comments that are abusive, obscene, incendiary, defamatory or irrelevant will not be published.

3. We may remove hyperlinks within comments.

4. Kindly use a genuine email ID and provide your name.

5. Spamming the comments section under different user names may result in being blacklisted.


Today's Columnists

Ministry of Religious Affairs and Interfaith Harmony: A nation rich in unity

Friday, 15 November 2019

This series is based on business leader Dhammika Perera’s recently revealed ‘Economic Growth Strategy and Action Plan to increase GDP Per Capita from $ 4,000 to $ 12,000’. The document outlines goals and action plans for 23 ministries and to

Securing a People’s Constitution

Friday, 15 November 2019

The need for making a People’s Constitution has become a topic of interest not only among the public but also among some candidates of the Presidential Election. Rohan Pallewatte and Mahesh Senanayake have included it in their election manifestos.

The Presidential Election and Dark Public Relations

Friday, 15 November 2019

At the moment we can see only the mudslinging in the Sri Lankan Presidential Election. According to literature, the main objective of Dark Public Relations (DPR) or negative public relations is to discredit someone else, who may pose a threat to the

Keen interest in the US on Sri Lankan elections

Friday, 15 November 2019

While the only show in Trump Town is the contentious impeachment hearings which commenced today, the premier National Public Radio (NRP) devoted a segment to a concise report by its special correspondent Lauren Frayer who had travelled to Colombo and

Columnists More