Home / Opinion and Issues/ Sri Lanka’s debt to GDP ratio for 2017 is 81% says AG not 77.6% as reported by Govt.

Sri Lanka’s debt to GDP ratio for 2017 is 81% says AG not 77.6% as reported by Govt.

Comments / {{hitsCtrl.values.hits}} Views / Wednesday, 13 June 2018 00:11

By Ajith Nivard Cabraal


The Debt to GDP ratio is one of the most important macroeconomic indicators in assessing a country’s economy. While it sets out the level of indebtedness of a country in proportion to its Gross Domestic Product, it also provides a measure of its repaywment capacity. 

Further, a Time-series of Debt to GDP ratios indicates the trend as to whether indebtedness is rising or falling. 

Sri Lanka’s Debt to GDP ratio was a very high 91% in 2005 when the Mahinda Rajapaksa administration took office. Thereafter, through a process of sustained growth of the economy, stabilisation of the rupee, increased local and foreign investment, reduction of interest rates, compression of the budget deficit and containment of inflation, the authorities were able to reduce the Debt to GDP ratio to 71% by the time that the administration was voted out of office in early January 2015. 

Since then the Yahapalanaya management of the economy has pushed the indebtedness of the country towards unacceptable levels, triggered by prolific government expenditure, rapidly depreciating currency, increased interest rates, highly wasteful endeavours and the discouragement of investors. Such outcomes have led to the ballooning of the debt stock and the escalation of the Debt to GDP ratio, with the Central Bank Annual Report 2017 stating that as at the end of 2017, the Government’s Debt stock has increased to Rs. 10,313 billion and the Debt to GDP ratio had increased to 77.6%; up from Rs. 7,391 billion and 71.3% as at end 2014. 

Incorrect debt position

However, the Auditor General’s Report on the Financial Statements for 2017 of the Ministry of Finance (which have been released on the ministry website recently without any publicity), points out that the Sri Lankan Government’s debt position of Rs. 10,313 billion is incorrect, and that the actual debt is Rs. 10,702 billion; a staggering Rs. 389 billion (about $ 2.5 billion) higher! Such a sum is equivalent to the cumulative investment made by the Rajapaksa Government on the Colombo-Katunayake Expressway, the Norochcholai Coal Power Plant and the Hambantota Port. 

The Auditor General also states that the Debt to GDP ratio is not 77.6%, but 81.0%! On that basis, Sri Lanka has now moved into a ‘Highly Indebted State’ category and it is only a matter of time before that dubious status will seriously impair Sri Lanka’s ability to raise funds. 

Fortunately for the Sri Lankan authorities, just before these dismal figures were made public, they had hurriedly secured some huge long-term loans. In May 2018, the authorities proudly announced that they had borrowed $ 2.5 billion via the issue of International Sovereign Bonds and a further $ 1.0 billion via a Syndicated Loan. 

Accordingly, Forex loans amounted to $ 3.5 billion or Rs. 556 billion. In addition, Rs. 90 billion was borrowed locally via the issue of long-tenor Treasury Bonds. At the same time, the rupee depreciation from 1 January 2018 up to 12 June 2018 is estimated to have increased the value of the Debt Stock by a further Rs. 196 billion. Therefore, the total increase of public debt in May 2018 can be computed at a mind-boggling sum of Rs. 842 billion, a sum which is over 6% of GDP! 

“Out of control borrowings”

In contrast, the total borrowings of the Rajapaksa administration during the entire year 2014 was Rs. 598 billion. Such a comparison shows the unprecedented and reckless borrowing spree of the Yahapalanaya government. 

In addition to the “out-of-control” borrowings, the present Government is also unleashing a vicious cocktail of unconscionable taxes on struggling businesses and hapless people, while effecting major increases in the prices of public utilities as well. As a result, all stakeholders of the Sri Lankan economy are now reeling under this twin barrage. 

Adding to these woes, a few days ago the Prime Minister announced that he would be considering further increases in Value Added Tax rates in the near future, even while increasing the number of ministers just to keep the disgruntled MPs at bay. This callous attitude shows that the current inept and corrupt Government is fast running out of options and is losing control of the economy, thereby causing the once-vibrant Sri Lankan economy to drift without a vision, direction or focus. 

The writer is a former Governor of the Central Bank of Sri Lanka

Share This Article


1. All comments will be moderated by the Daily FT Web Editor.

2. Comments that are abusive, obscene, incendiary, defamatory or irrelevant will not be published.

3. We may remove hyperlinks within comments.

4. Kindly use a genuine email ID and provide your name.

5. Spamming the comments section under different user names may result in being blacklisted.


Today's Columnists

Warriors who fight for a larger purpose

Friday, 17 August 2018

Are women more naturally inclined to cooperation than men? Sulochana Sigera’s impassioned statement at last week’s Women in Management Awards seemed to suggest so. Addressing the under-representation of women decision-makers, Sigera pointed to th

Do we sink or swim? No Michael, row the boat ashore!

Friday, 17 August 2018

Why Sri Lanka needs to strengthen geopolitical ties to be a competitive global economy by 2030

Sri Lankan people want leaders to be decisive

Friday, 17 August 2018

The different leaders we have seen in Sri Lanka in the last 40 years beginning with JRJ to the current President were very different in their approach to power and authority, based on their cultural values and understandings of the leadership style.

The strategic role of the finance function: The path to relevance

Thursday, 16 August 2018

During my term as Global President of CIMA nearly a decade ago, the theme I chose for my year of leadership was a single word – ‘relevance’. The word relevance is perpetual. It is contextual to when it is used. It is extremely applicable to the

Columnists More