Home / News/ Speaker gets stern over political impasse

Speaker gets stern over political impasse


Comments / {{hitsCtrl.values.hits}} Views / Monday, 29 October 2018 00:55


Sri Lanka’s Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe (centre) speaks to his supporters at the Prime Minister’s Official Residence in Colombo, Sri Lanka, 27 October – REUTERS

 

 

Amidst roiling political turmoil in the country, Speaker of Parliament Karu Jayasuriya yesterday urged President Maithripala Sirisena to allow Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe to keep his security and privileges until another person could prove he commanded a majority in the House. 

The civil but strongly-worded letter, which seemed to recognise Wickremesinghe as the country’s lawful Prime Minister, said his security and privileges should not be removed until Parliament could establish who commanded a majority in the House. 

The Speaker also alluded to the fact that President Sirisena had ignored the democratic practice of consulting the Speaker of Parliament before proroguing Parliament. 

“Continuing the prorogation of Parliament until 16 November will have serious and undesirable consequences for our country, and I kindly request you to reconsider same,” the Speaker’s letter said. 

On Friday, the UNP wrote to Speaker Jayasuriya saying Ranil Wickremesinghe was the lawful Prime Minister, commanding a majority in Parliament. The party urged the Speaker to ensure his security and privileges were protected as the Prime Minister who holds office under Article 42 (4) of the Constitution. 

In his letter to President Sirisena, the Speaker said he believed the request was “fair and democratic”. 

Speaker Jayasuriya said it was his foremost duty to ensure the security of all elected representatives of the people in these times of “political crisis”. 

“It is particularly important in light of various individuals issuing threats across the media,” the Speaker said in his letter after JO MP Wimal Weerawansa told a news conference on Saturday (28) that Wickremesinghe had been given a deadline until 8.00 am. on Sunday to vacate Temple Trees or be “forced out by the public”. 

The Speaker of Parliament, the country’s third citizen at a time when two men are staking a claim to the premiership, warned the President about the “gravity” and international implications of the current constitutional imbroglio, which Government ministers and political analysts have called a “constitutional coup”. His letters referred to “forcible takeovers” reported at state media institutions. 

Some political analysts said the Speaker had fired the first salvo that could indicate he may be willing to summon Parliament, despite the President’s suspension of sittings. 

Opposition Leader Rajavarothiam Sampanthan wrote to Speaker Jayasuriya last night, urging him to “uphold the rule of law” by summoning Parliament “forthwith”, “recognising the necessity of upholding the supremacy of the constitution of the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka; recognising the supremacy of parliament comprising the democratically elected representatives of the people I hereby call upon yourself, sir, to uphold the rule of law by summoning parliament forthwith to enable parliament to perform its legitimate functions.” 

Legal experts said there was precedent for the Speaker of Parliament to convene the 225-member legislature amidst the prorogation by President Sirisena, citing a similar decision by former Speaker Joseph Michael Perera who ruled in 2003 that the President’s power to prorogue, summon and dissolve Parliament must be done in consultation with Parliament itself. 

“If confronted with such abuses of power, I rule that the majority of members should have the right to ask for Parliament to reconvene,” Speaker Perera noted in his 2003 ruling.

Political Scientist and retired University Professor Jayadeva Uyangoda told Daily FT that it was the first time in Sri Lanka’s 87 years of democratic history that partial regime change had taken place outside the constitutional process. 

“This is a capture of the state by the executive branch, by extra-constitutional means. It sets a bad precedent at a time when Sri Lanka had just restored the constitutional process,” noted Prof. Uyangoda. 

Other analysts were equally critical of Friday’s shocking sacking of Wickremesinghe. 

Dr. Nishan De Mel, who runs the Colombo-based think-tank Verite Research, said that what was unfolding in Sri Lanka was a coup. 

“Coercively taking over institutions – this is the structure of a coup. Then prorogue parliament equals a shut-down to consolidate #couplk. Will it be the first successful coup attempt in Sri Lankan history?” De Mel said on Twitter. 

 


Share This Article

Facebook Twitter


DISCLAIMER:

1. All comments will be moderated by the Daily FT Web Editor.

2. Comments that are abusive, obscene, incendiary, defamatory or irrelevant will not be published.

3. We may remove hyperlinks within comments.

4. Kindly use a genuine email ID and provide your name.

5. Spamming the comments section under different user names may result in being blacklisted.

COMMENTS

Today's Columnists

Autocatalytic descent from plural democracy to supremacist authoritarianism

Wednesday, 29 January 2020

In a few days, Sri Lanka will celebrate its 72nd year of independence from colonialism. But behind the pomp and pageant of that celebration is a sad reality of an autocatalytic process – a small initial event triggering a chain reaction that evolve


Trump destroying brand USA: Implications for Sri Lanka

Wednesday, 29 January 2020

There is an old adage that ‘politics and tourism’ has a positive correlation. Many have tried to disprove this aspect but the relationship is coming out very strongly, the latest case study to the world being in the United States. Trump cost $4.


Freedom! Freedom! Where art thou?

Wednesday, 29 January 2020

Freedom: who could object? Yet this word is now used to justify a thousand forms of exploitation. In the name of freedom – the freedom of the powerful to exploit the weak, the rich to exploit the poor. The definition of freedom is, the condition of


Development project information: Public expectations and their right to know

Wednesday, 29 January 2020

Infrastructure development will be at the centre-stage during the next five years, irrespective of which mainstream political party will be in power. This writer has previously had articles published in the Daily FT on building regulations, infrastr


Columnists More