Home / News/ SLPP accuses SLFP of destructive behaviour

SLPP accuses SLFP of destructive behaviour


Comments / {{hitsCtrl.values.hits}} Views / Tuesday, 9 April 2019 00:48


Sri Lanka Podujana Peramuna (SLPP) Chairman Prof. G.L Peiris with MP Rohitha Abeygunawardena at the media briefing – Pic by Lasantha Kumara

By Nuwan Senarathna 

The Sri Lanka Podujana Peramuna (SLPP) yesterday said criticised the Sri Lanka Freedom Party’s (SLFP) abstinence in voting in the third reading of Budget 2019, causing a serious rift in the anti-United National Party (UNP) camp. 

While the decision will have no bearing on the talks between two parties, SLPP Chairman Prof. G.L Peiris claimed that the move had created a serious challenge that needed to be solved to regain the trust of the anti-United National Party (UNP) camp.

“The SLFP actions had dented the trust of the anti-UNP camp. We cannot argue that the SLFP’s decision has not dented the public’s trust. One thing is clear, from now on the SLFP has to take 50% of the responsibility for harmful decisions of this Government,” Prof. Peiris told reporters at Party Head Office in Battaramulla.

The Appropriation Bill 2019 was passed in Parliament on Friday with 119 MPS voting in favour, while 74 including the Janatha Vimukthi Peramuna (JVP) were against it. However, a group of SLFP MPs, largely identified as loyal to President Maithripala Sirisena, abstained from voting.

Prof. Peiris said the SLFP’s decision to abstain from the vote would also hold them accountable for the outcomes of the Budget. He also questioned the intentions of the SLFP, insisting that moves to abstain from the Budget vote would not help to defeat the UNP Government or its economic policies that oppressed the public.

“If you refused to vote against the United National Party (UNP) Budget, that is a gesture of protecting the Government,” he added.

He pointed out that Budget was the most important bill, which any party should not miss. He noted the final vote on Budget 2019 was the only chance the SLFP had to correct itself but it had intentionally skipped the opportunity.

Prof. Peiris questioned the double standard of SLFP that certain MPs of the SLFP who criticised the Budget but absent during the vote. “People who took that stand to abstain from the Budget vote will have to explain to their respective electorates how they can credibly claim to be against the UNP and economic policies,” he added.

However, Prof. Peiris said the issues that arose following the SLFP’s decision on the Budget vote could be solved during the talks between two parties. He noted that the SLPP would go into talks with the SLFP with no strings attached. 

Talks between the SLFP and SLPP commenced on 14 March looking to form a broader political alliance against the UNP. Following the first round of talks, both parties were able to find common ground. The next round of talks will be held on 10 April. 


Share This Article

Facebook Twitter


DISCLAIMER:

1. All comments will be moderated by the Daily FT Web Editor.

2. Comments that are abusive, obscene, incendiary, defamatory or irrelevant will not be published.

3. We may remove hyperlinks within comments.

4. Kindly use a genuine email ID and provide your name.

5. Spamming the comments section under different user names may result in being blacklisted.

COMMENTS

Today's Columnists

Roots of the crisis

Saturday, 14 December 2019

The candidates who had genuinely contested the Presidential Election had elaborate and attractive election manifestos. But none of them had a pragmatic program to address the basic question of how to overcome the extensive crisis Sri Lanka is facing.


What price reforms now that progress rules?

Friday, 13 December 2019

It was a famous victory. A shadow of a doubt persists after an election commission member spoke up recently, after the event, about an alleged irregularity somewhere in the voting system works. But this would be churlish, buffoonish and academic to t


Assessment of fitness and propriety of directors and officers

Friday, 13 December 2019

In the early ’80s, a businessman turned financier from the hill capital started a public deposit canvassing drive by offering 20% interest per month. The depositors were offered on the spot payment of 20% as interest for the first month for their d


How to select top officials to public corporations

Friday, 13 December 2019

It is commendable that the President wants to select suitable decision-makers to public corporations without them being mere and ad hoc political appointments. However, the process thus far seems somewhat weak. Various people are complaining about th


Columnists More