Home / News/ SLFP slams Karu’s efforts to hold a vote

SLFP slams Karu’s efforts to hold a vote


Comments / {{hitsCtrl.values.hits}} Views / Friday, 9 November 2018 00:00


 

  • Says Speaker’s action giving detrimental impressions of SL’s democracy to in’tl community 
  • Believes Welgama should keep his opinions within party ears

 By Nuwan Senarathna 

Sri Lank Freedom Party (SLFP) MP W. D. J. Senewiratne yesterday criticised Speaker Karu Jayasuriya as having exceeded his powers while emphasising it is unlikely that a vote to decide the majority of the House would be taken on 14 November with the possibility of Parliament being postponed after the ceremonial address by President Sirisena still present.

Speaker Karu Jayasuriya’s effort to call for a vote on 14 November, ignoring the customary practice of limiting the session to a ceremonial address, was going beyond the powers given to the Speaker, he told reporters at a press conference.

Senewiratne said the SLFP had been monitoring the behaviour of the Speaker and hinted proper action might be taken in due course. 

He pointed out that the Speaker’s statement on the President’s decision to prorogue Parliament had hindered the democratic rights of people and created a negative picture among the international community.  “The Speaker is the person who holds a neutral position in Parliament. Therefore, when he issued a statement stating that democratic rights of Sri Lanka had been violated, the international community took it seriously and acted upon it.”

He said President Maithripala Sirisena had to explain to the international community and heads of diplomatic missions based in Colombo the statement of the Speaker and to point out that his decision to prorogue Parliament had not violated the Constitution of Sri Lanka. 

Responding to speculation on SLFP MP Kumara Welgama’s statement that the appointment of Mahinda Rajapaksa as Prime Minister by President Maithripala Sirisena had paralysed the Government, he said that SLFP could not be in agreement with Welgama’s statement.

“It was his personal opinion. He might have thought that appointment of Mahinda Rajapaksa as the Prime Minister should have been done at another time. His statement does not reflect the party’s opinion. ”

He also said that Welgama had chosen the wrong place to express his opinion on the decisions taken by the party. “If he has criticism, he should do it during a party meeting, not in public places.”


Share This Article


DISCLAIMER:

1. All comments will be moderated by the Daily FT Web Editor.

2. Comments that are abusive, obscene, incendiary, defamatory or irrelevant will not be published.

3. We may remove hyperlinks within comments.

4. Kindly use a genuine email ID and provide your name.

5. Spamming the comments section under different user names may result in being blacklisted.

COMMENTS

Today's Columnists

Untruth is the crisis

Tuesday, 13 November 2018

Political language, said George Orwell, is designed to make lies sound truthful, murder respectable, and to give an appearance of solidity to pure wind. Dr. Sarath Amunugama is the subject of this essay. In addition to his current incarnation of a p


Rise, Sri Lankans – our country needs you now!

Tuesday, 13 November 2018

I am sick, tired and bloody fed up of reading and listening to pessimistic tales of woe on the unprecedented crisis we and our country are facing at this dark moment in time. I am also fed up to the back teeth with reading and listening to lamentatio


Ranil abused and subverted parliamentary democracy

Tuesday, 13 November 2018

TIME: What was the immediate reason for calling an election? President Kumaratunga: I was forced into it by a total breakdown of cohabitation in Government. The Prime Minister (Ranil Wickremesinghe) was determined to harass me and chase me out. He ha


The Bench must ensure that the judges will continue to be trusted

Monday, 12 November 2018

In the backdrop of the recent developments and the strong arguments that have been presented against the dissolution of Parliament saying the President has no constitutional power to do so, before four and a half years into a Parliamentary term, as s


Columnists More