Home / News/ SC issues notice on Deputy Minister Ranjan Ramanayake over alleged contempt of court

SC issues notice on Deputy Minister Ranjan Ramanayake over alleged contempt of court


Comments / {{hitsCtrl.values.hits}} Views / Friday, 13 October 2017 00:00


By S.S. Selvanayagam

The Supreme Court yesterday issued notice on Deputy Minister Ranjan Ramanayake returnable for 25 October pursuant to two petitions complaining of him having committed the alleged offence of Contempt of Court.

The bench comprised justices B.P. Aluvihara, Sisira J. De Abrew and Anil Gooneratne.

Petitioners Sunil Perera and Ven. Magalkande Sudaththa Thero are seeking contempt of court action against the Deputy Minister for Social Empowerment, Welfare and Kandyan Heritage Ranjan Ramanayake for his alleged statement made at a press conference held on 21 August allegedly damaging the reputation of the Judiciary and lawyers. Rasika Tissanayake appeared for the petitioners.

The petitioners allege that the statement brings disrepute to the Judiciary and the lawyers of the country.

They claim Ramanayake is liable to be punished under Article 105(3) of the Constitution.

 Article 105(3) reads: “The Supreme Court of the Republic of Sri Lanka and the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Sri Lanka shall each be a superior court of record and shall have all the powers of such court including the power to punish for contempt of court itself, whether committed in the court itself or elsewhere, with imprisonment or fine or both as the court may deem fit.”

 The petitioners state that the statement is made at a time when the international community and organisations are trying to force the country to establish special courts or tribunals to prosecute war heroes with the participation of judges from overseas by infringing the sovereignty of the people.

They state that the statement made by the respondent ridicules and insults the members of the legal profession at large who are officers of the court and also amounts to the commission of the offence of contempt of court.

 


Share This Article


DISCLAIMER:

1. All comments will be moderated by the Daily FT Web Editor.

2. Comments that are abusive, obscene, incendiary, defamatory or irrelevant will not be published.

3. We may remove hyperlinks within comments.

4. Kindly use a genuine email ID and provide your name.

5. Spamming the comments section under different user names may result in being blacklisted.

COMMENTS

Today's Columnists

Imran may turn blind eye to blasphemy law and persecution of Ahmadiyyas

Saturday, 22 September 2018

There are clear signs that Pakistan’s freshly minted Prime Minister, Imran Khan, will make a sincere effort to reduce corruption and maladministration in the domestic sphere. In foreign affairs he is likely to make a brave attempt to mend fences wi


The rate of exchange, capital flight and the Central Bank

Friday, 21 September 2018

The Central Bank (CBSL) exists for the sole purpose of price stability. Its controls on the financial system and monetary policy exist to maintain price stability. As put forth many times by the Governor, the failing of the CBSL to control inflation


Red flag over the Sri Lankan Navy

Friday, 21 September 2018

Shocking story Rusiripala, a former banker in Sri Lanka, who has taken to writing in Daily FT, is perturbed by the red flag I have raised (Daily FT article 18 September) over the shocking charge that our Navy had operated a ransom gang that had abduc


The bald truth about fake news, etc.

Friday, 21 September 2018

In its most innocent forms, we may all enjoy a bit of ‘fake news’ and go to bed with a lighter heart and clean conscience. A meme on Facebook urging social media consumers to caution – “You can’t believe everything you read on the internet


Columnists More