Home / News/ Hambantota Port Project: FR contesting Framework Agreement

Hambantota Port Project: FR contesting Framework Agreement

Comments / {{hitsCtrl.values.hits}} Views / Friday, 26 January 2018 00:00



  • SC fixes support for leave on 4 April

 The Supreme Court yesterday deferred to 4 April the fundamental rights petition contesting the Framework Agreement on the Financing, Construction, Operation and Management of the Hambantota Port Project.

The bench comprised Chief Justice Priyasath Dep and justices Sisira J De Abrew and Vijith K. Malalgoda. The petition was filed by Suraj Walgama as a public interest litigation citing Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe, Minister of Ports, members of the Cabinet and others as respondents.

He is seeking a declaration from the Court that the Framework Agreement as well as the Concession Agreement are null and void and have no force or effect under the law.

He is asking for an order from Court to set aside the Framework Agreement entered into by the Sri Lankan Government with the 55th Respondent China Merchants Port Holdings Ltd.

He is seeking a declaration from Court that any alienation of state land or other resources of the State to the 55th  Respondent China Merchants Port Holdings Ltd, 57th Respondent Hambantota International Port Group Ltd. and 58th Respondent Hambantota International Port Services Ltd. or to any person and body more fully referred to in the Cabinet decision made on 6 December 2016 (vide P24) and pursuant to the  Framework Agreement dated 8 December 2016 and the  Concession Agreement dated 29 July 2017 are null and void. (SS)


Share This Article

Facebook Twitter


1. All comments will be moderated by the Daily FT Web Editor.

2. Comments that are abusive, obscene, incendiary, defamatory or irrelevant will not be published.

3. We may remove hyperlinks within comments.

4. Kindly use a genuine email ID and provide your name.

5. Spamming the comments section under different user names may result in being blacklisted.


Today's Columnists

Soaring heights of NPLs in banking

Thursday, 27 June 2019

Capital inadequacy, political interference, abuse of power, wasteful and unproductive expenditure, corrupt deals, circumventions of regulatory directions, unscrupulous lending operations, imposed IMF and WB conditions for reforms, and window-dressed

New Land Policy: Ideal alternate development strategy, but accompanying policies needed

Thursday, 27 June 2019

It is reported that the Government has prepared a law to grant freehold possession of farm land held under lease from the Government. This may be a revision of the Land Development Ordinance (LDO) of 1935. This article proposes to discuss the pros a

Need for an education revolution: Future of our kids and the nation is at risk – Part II

Thursday, 27 June 2019

Lessons to be learnt from the Asian educational giants A journalist of New York Times requested Hideki Shirakawa, a Nobel laureate, to describe Japanese culture. He said, “Fundamentally, Japanese culture is based on rice farming. Rice cultivation r

Country’s reconciliation with English and Moragahakanda

Thursday, 27 June 2019

When the country received independence from British, it was blessed with an efficient administration, a high standard in education, and also sound foreign exchange reserves; the country was admired by other countries. The three major and several mino

Columnists More