Home / News/ Duminda Silva appeals to SC against High Court judgment

Duminda Silva appeals to SC against High Court judgment

Comments / {{hitsCtrl.values.hits}} Views / Wednesday, 9 May 2018 00:10



  • Court fixes 10 May for further submission

 By S.S. Selvanayagam

The Supreme Court yesterday fixed to resume further submissions on 10 May (Thursday) with respect to the appeal petitions filed by five accused, including former Defence Ministry Monitoring MP Duminda Silva, against the judgment of the Colombo High Court.

The bench comprised Chief Justice Priyasath Dep, B.P. Aluvihara, Priyantha Jayawardane, Nalin Perera and Vijith K. Malalgoda.

President’s Counsel Anil de Silva appeared for Duminda Silva. Anuja Premaratne appeared for Anura Thushara de Mel and Deputy Solicitor General Thusith Mudalige appeared for the Attorney General.

The accused were sentenced to death by the Colombo High Court in a divided judgment for committing the murder of four persons in 2011, including former MP Bharatha Lakshman Premachandra.

Five accused - former Defence Ministry Monitoring MP Silva, Anura Thushara de Mel, Chaminda Ravi Jayanath alias Dematagoda Chaminda, Dissanayake Mudiyanselage Sarath Bandara and Janaka Bandara Galagoda - were sentenced to death by the Colombo High Court for committing the murder of four persons including former MP Premachandra on 8 October 2011. The verdict was divided two to one with judges Pathmini N. Ranawaka and M.C.B.S. Moraes finding the five accused guilty on 10 charges, including committing and conspiring to commit the murder of four people, while Justice Shiran Gunaratne, the President of the Colombo High Court Trial-at-Bar, found the 13 accused not guilty of all 17 charges.

While delivering their judgment, two judges, Pathmini N. Ranawaka Gunatilleke and M.C.B.S. Moraes, unanimously decided that the prosecutors had proved the five accused guilty beyond reasonable doubt. High Court Judge Pathmini N. Ranawaka Gunatilleke had observed that the behaviour of the 11th accused, Silva, had led to the whole incident.

The judge further observed that the evidence had proven that Silva had provided leadership to the mob and therefore he should be held responsible for the whole incident.

However, High Court Judge Shiran Gunaratne found all the accused not guilty, citing that there was no substantial evidence to charge them under 17 counts. He had observed that the evidence presented by the investigative officers was contradictory in nature and the benefit of the doubt should go to the accused.

The other accused, Chandana Jagath Kumara, Lanka Rasanjana, Malaka Sameera, Widanagamage Amila, Suranga Premalal, Saman Kumara Abeywickrema and Rohana Marasinghe, were acquitted and released. The accused were charged under 17 counts, including committing and conspiring to commit murder of four individuals, inflicting gunshot injuries, unlawful assembly and criminal intimidation on or around 8 October 2011.

The accused had been charged under section 296, 140, 146, 147, 486 and 300 of the penal code. They were further charged under the offences of the Firearms Act.

The accused had been charged under 17 counts, including the killing of Premachandra, Dharshana Jayathilaka, Mohamed Azmy and Manimel Kumaraswamy and for shooting and injuring Premachandra’s bodyguard, Rajapurage Gamini, after unlawfully assembling at Walpola, Mulleriyawa.


Share This Article

Facebook Twitter


1. All comments will be moderated by the Daily FT Web Editor.

2. Comments that are abusive, obscene, incendiary, defamatory or irrelevant will not be published.

3. We may remove hyperlinks within comments.

4. Kindly use a genuine email ID and provide your name.

5. Spamming the comments section under different user names may result in being blacklisted.


Today's Columnists

We need to challenge climate change doubters before it is too late

Friday, 23 August 2019

Imagine a London where the entire subterranean region is engulfed with dirty water. Crammed train carriages that once barrelled along 249 miles of track transporting busy office workers, builders, teachers, civil servants, cleaners and students now r

The Provincial Council Elections – The charade goes on

Friday, 23 August 2019

Originally the SLPP was keen to hold the Provincial Council Elections (PCE) immediately after the Local Government Election results as they felt the PCE would go in their favour. PCE were held under the Proportional Representation system. The relevan

The presidency and the dilemma of the Presidential Election

Friday, 23 August 2019

J.R. Jayewardene created a presidential system not because the parliamentary system of governance that preceded it had failed. He wanted to take over all the powers of the State and assume the status of ancient kings who ruled the country in the past

Enough power in the presidency for the right person

Friday, 23 August 2019

The presidency has not much power some say, but I would say there is plenty for the right person. By intention or otherwise, our Constitution leaves the presidency to be defined by the person occupying the chair. Maithripala Sirisena (MS) showed us t

Columnists More

Special Report