Home / News/ Court rejects appeal against Gnanasara Thero’s sentence

Court rejects appeal against Gnanasara Thero’s sentence

Comments / {{hitsCtrl.values.hits}} Views / Saturday, 1 September 2018 00:00

By S. S. Selvanayagam

Court of Appeal yesterday declined to grant formal leave to appeal to the Supreme Court contesting its judgment of the conviction and the sentence of Gnanasara Thero on 8 August. 

The Bench comprised Justices P. Padman Surasena and Shiran Gooneratne, who were of the view that there is no substantive question of law to grant leave. 

When the matter was taken up, Counsel Arseculeratne PC, appearing for the Accused-Respondent Gnanasara Thero, submitted that the charge against his client emulates from a single incident and that there is no admission of specific act. 

He submitted a question arises as to whether each act could be taken as separate act. 

He cited three grounds for leave to appeal is to be sought in the Supreme Court. 

One: As a matter of law, the accused can be charged, convicted and sentenced separately for four separate counts in respect of one incident that occurred before the Homagama Magistrate’s Court on 25 January 2016. 

He submitted that when there is one Contempt Of Court charge, it had been split into four charges. 

Two: An overall sentence of six years imprisonment excessive for a single incident of Contempt Of Court of the Magistrate’s Court whereas a sentence of two years imprisonment had been imposed by the Supreme Court against S. B. Dissanayake in respect of Contempt of the entire Supreme Court. 

Three: Should the mitigatory fact that the Accused-Respondent did not appear before Court for his own personal cause but instead due to his own patriotic sentiments for the cause of the soldiers who fought to end the war be considered by the Court in sentencing the Accused-Respondent? 

He submitted that the Accused-Respondent did not interfere for his own cause but for the common cause and that he addressed the Court in a way that may be improper. 

Deputy Solicitor General Rohantha Abeysuriya, appearing for the Attorney General, submitted that the test which is to be used should be objective. He argued that the question of mitigation of sentence did not arise as there is no mitigatory situation where it is not sudden provocation. 

He submitted that the Accused-Respondent in his speech addressed aspersion with his intention and that it is Contempt Of Court.

He also underlined that the Court must be free from external interferences and it should not be allowed to interfere with the Court proceedings.

He submitted the Court should not take into account the mitigatory facts but subjective factors.

He also said the Contempt Of Court matter of S. B. Dissanayake could not be equated with this matter. 

Court of Appeal on 8 August in its judgment found guilty of all four counts of charges on the alleged offence of Contempt Of Court against Gnanasara Thero and sentenced him for all four counts, totalling 19 years rigorous imprisonment, but ruled that these sentences run concurrently, resulting in only six years rigorous imprisonment. 

The judgment was delivered by Justice P. Padman Surasena (President/CA) with Justice Shiran Gunaratne concurring. 

Homagama Magistrate Ranga Dissanayake filed a Contempt Of Court action in the Court of Appeal against Bodu Bala Sena (BBS) General Secretary Galagoda Atte Gnanasara Thero, seeking the Appeal Court’s constitutional jurisdiction against Gnasara Thero’s alleged offensive behaviour in the Homagama Magistrate’s Court amounting to Contempt Of Court on 25 January 2016. 

On 25 January Galagoda Atte Gnanasara Thero began to address Open Court after the Court hearing pertaining to the disappearance of journalist Prageeth Eknaligoda was over. Later on, Gnanasara Thero was arrested by police on the charges of Contempt of Court, obstructing Court proceedings and intimidating a public servant.

Through this Contempt Of Court action, the Homagama Magistrate sought the Appeal Court’s jurisdiction to consider whether the alleged offensive behaviour of Gnanasara Thero inside the Court amounts to Contempt Of Court.

It is reliably learnt that Gnanasara Thero is to file Special Leave to Appeal directly to Supreme Court.


Share This Article


1. All comments will be moderated by the Daily FT Web Editor.

2. Comments that are abusive, obscene, incendiary, defamatory or irrelevant will not be published.

3. We may remove hyperlinks within comments.

4. Kindly use a genuine email ID and provide your name.

5. Spamming the comments section under different user names may result in being blacklisted.


Today's Columnists

Constitutional paradox: There is no such thing called Election Commission

Wednesday, 14 November 2018

Our Constitution, which was certified by Parliament on 31 August 1978, has 19 amendments; the First Amendment to the Constitution was certified by the Speaker in the same year on 20 November. By the end of 1988, there had been 14 amendments made to t

‘So Sri Lanka’ – upgrade staff, processes, infrastructure at BIA arrivals to be world’s best!

Wednesday, 14 November 2018

24 October, time 12:47 p.m., place – my residence in Colombo My phone buzzes with a WhatsApp message from my old colleague Prasad Fernanado now with Saudi British Bank in Saudi. I am thrilled to see the message ‘Sri Lanka top country for travel i

Qatar crisis: From the Sri Lankans’ point of view

Wednesday, 14 November 2018

The aim of this article is to examine the Saudi blockade over Qatar and its impact in the past 17 months on the country. A special focus will be given to the Sri Lankan workers who have been living in Qatar for the past two decades. The reason why th

The reality of Sri Lanka – household end!

Wednesday, 14 November 2018

Whilst Sri Lanka is debating what is right and wrong on the governance of the country, the Sri Lankan household is falling part due to escalating costs, as per the latest data released by respected research agency Nielsen. For the seventh quarter in

Columnists More