Home / News/ Counsel alleges 20th Amendment would create monstrous government

Counsel alleges 20th Amendment would create monstrous government


Comments / {{hitsCtrl.values.hits}} Views / Thursday, 13 September 2018 00:08


By S.S. Selvanayagam

Senior Counsel Manohara de Silva yesterday, making a submission on the 20th Amendment of the Constitution, contended that if the 20th Amendment is enacted, it would create a monstrous government with two organs which do not know each other’s decision.

Petitions challenging the Bill was taken up before the Bench, comprising Justices Sisira J. de Abrew, Prasanna S. Jayawardena and Murdu N. B. Fernando, for special determination on the constitutionality.

The said Bill was presented by JVP Gampaha District MP Vijitha Herath to the Parliament as a private Bill on 5 September to amend the present Constitution to curtail some of the powers of the Executive Presidency provided by the 18th Amendment.

Counsel Manohara de Silva PC appeared for Petitioner Udaya Gammanpilla of Pivituru Hela Urumaya, challenging the constitutionality of said Bill.

He said that the power to the Executive President is presently vested by the People, not by the Cabinet of Ministers.

He stated the Bill provides both the President and the Cabinet of Ministers the executive power to exercise, and that it is encroaching the executive power of the President.

He said it needs to be understood that it is to make the President as ceremonial President or Head of the State.

He submitted the 1972 Constitution provided the executive power to be exercised through the President and the Cabinet of Ministers and that here, a simple provision is included in the said Bill providing both the President and the Cabinet of Ministers executive power to concurrently exercise.

He said the Bill provides executive power to two organs to exercise it independently, and there is a fundamental shift of power to parallel two organs to exercise executive power, totally altering the present structure of the Constitution.

In the Provincial Councils, the power is vested to be exercised through the Governor on the advice of the Board of Ministers of the Provincial Council, he said.

He pointed out that there is no provision in the Bill that the President is a part of the Cabinet of Ministers and not even a member of the Cabinet, and that if the Bill is enacted, the President can continue to exercise his executive power without the advice of the Prime Minister, in particular take decisions without the consent of the Cabinet of Ministers.

He pinpointed as per the new Bill, the President does not make the statement of the Government, and the people do not know which direction the country is heading for.

Sanjeeva Jayawardena PC appeared for intervenient Petitioner Ven. Iththekande Sadhatissa Thera. Dharshan Weraduwage appeared for Jayantha Samaraweera MP from Wimal Weerawansa’s Jathika Nidhahas Peramuna.

Petitioners seek from the Court the determination that the Bill violates Article 3 (…in the Republic of Sri Lanka, sovereignty is in the people and is inalienable. Sovereignty includes the power of government, fundamental rights and the franchise).

They also seek a determination that the Bill infringes Article 4 (exercise of sovereignty) and Article 30(2), (…the President of the Republic shall be elected by the people, and shall hold office for a term of six years).

Their request from the Court is to have the Bill passed by two-thirds majority in the Parliament and a referendum by the people.

 


Share This Article


DISCLAIMER:

1. All comments will be moderated by the Daily FT Web Editor.

2. Comments that are abusive, obscene, incendiary, defamatory or irrelevant will not be published.

3. We may remove hyperlinks within comments.

4. Kindly use a genuine email ID and provide your name.

5. Spamming the comments section under different user names may result in being blacklisted.

COMMENTS

Today's Columnists

The Brahmin footprint in Sri Lankan history

Saturday, 17 November 2018

It is generally said that there are no genuine “Sri Lankan” Brahmins in the island today, and that those Brahmins who officiate as priests in Hindu kovils (temples) are of Indian origin with close ties with Tamil Nadu.


Country paying for Sirisena’s childlike behaviour

Saturday, 17 November 2018

Many were surprised on 26 October to see former President Rajapaksa being appointed Prime Minister by the very man who defeated him a couple years ago, at a considerable risk to himself and to those who helped him win the election. Then events beca


The JR-MR effect

Saturday, 17 November 2018

Sri Lanka over the last few weeks has experienced a twin crisis. One is political provoked by its Constitution, and the other economic engendered by its politics. However, this crisis is the combined effect of two previous presidencies, those of J.R.


The fish that swallowed the whale

Friday, 16 November 2018

This is an easy-peasy, elementary effort of an ordinary citizen to comprehend the mad scramble for power among the political class. It is undertaken in the belief that the crisis we face is an opportunity to reject the family kleptocracy of Mahinda R


Columnists More