Home / News/ Contempt against Sarath Silva: Justice Jayawardane recuses himself from hearing

Contempt against Sarath Silva: Justice Jayawardane recuses himself from hearing


Comments / {{hitsCtrl.values.hits}} Views / Friday, 8 February 2019 00:00

Facebook

 


By S.S. Selvanayagam

Justice Priyantha Jayawardane recused himself from being a member of the Bench which is hearing the contempt of court allegation against former Chief Justice Sarath N.Silva.

The matter came up before the Bench comprising Justices Priyantha Jayawardane, Murdu N.B. Fernando and E.A.G.R. Amarasekara yesterday (7).

Court deferred the matter for 8 May.

The contempt of court petition was filed against former Chief Justice Sarath N. Silva by Senior Prof. Chandraguptha Thenuwara, Prof. Hewa Waduge Cyril, and Senior Prof. Prashantha Gunawardena. Upul Jayasuriya PC appeared for the Petitioners. 1st Respondent Sarath Silva was present in court and represented by Counsels. Romesh de Silva PC with Sugath Caldera and Sanjeeva Jayawardena PC appeared for him. Additional Solicitor General Sanjay Rajaratnam with Deputy Solicitor General Nerin Pulle appeared for the Attorney General.

The petitioners state that on 3 December 2018, the former Chief Justice Sarath N.Silva addressed a rally at Maradana junction organised by the ‘Jathika Ekamuthuwa’ organisation, a group loyal to MP Mahinda Rajapaksa.

They impugn that the 1st Respondent Sarath Silva made his speech in utter contempt of court particularly of the Interim Order delivered by the Supreme Court on 13 November  2018 and the Interim Order delivered by the Court of Appeal on the evening of 3 December 2108.

They state the Respondent deliberately, maliciously and contemptuously made statements in relation to the Court process, the judgment and the conduct of the Court.

They point out that the said threats, insinuations, comments and statements had been uttered in public by Sarath Silva and thus the said acts amount to a gross contempt of court.

Petitioners are seeking the Court to charge him on the offence of contempt of the Supreme Court and to impose sentence on him.


Share This Article

Facebook Twitter


DISCLAIMER:

1. All comments will be moderated by the Daily FT Web Editor.

2. Comments that are abusive, obscene, incendiary, defamatory or irrelevant will not be published.

3. We may remove hyperlinks within comments.

4. Kindly use a genuine email ID and provide your name.

5. Spamming the comments section under different user names may result in being blacklisted.

COMMENTS

Today's Columnists

Religion is a problem in Sri Lanka; can it be a solution?

Saturday, 17 August 2019

Generally, it is expected that religion should be a solution to a problem. Ironically in Sri Lanka religion is the problem. Therefore, what would be the solution? When religion becomes a problem of a country....


Orthodoxy and change: A perennial Muslim issue

Saturday, 17 August 2019

Whether Muslims live as minorities in non-Muslim countries or as majorities in a total of fifty seven countries, the clash of orthodoxy with modern challenges is a perennial issue that bedevils progress on several fronts in these communities.


Making the MCC Compact work for Sri Lanka

Friday, 16 August 2019

It is a sign of these political times that even an apolitical issue like a foreign aid program becomes a hot topic in Sri Lanka. In April 2019, the Board of Directors of the Millennium Challenge Corporation (MCC) approved a compact program for Sri La


Sri Lanka needs a president hungry for success, not power

Friday, 16 August 2019

The late John F. Kennedy described politics as a “noble adventure, an adventure in which one joins hands with the masses for the service of man”. Not that the Kennedys didn’t play “politricks” in their heyday. But playing “politricks” w


Columnists More

Special Report

SPECIAL REPORT MORE