Home / News/ CEB case on power cuts fixed for 16 April

CEB case on power cuts fixed for 16 April


Comments / {{hitsCtrl.values.hits}} Views / Wednesday, 10 April 2019 01:56

Facebook

 

  • Lawyer representing CEB unavailable, Court agrees to fresh date

By Manopriya Gunasekera 

Colombo Fort Magistrate’s Court yesterday postponed the case filed by the Public Utilities Commission of Sri Lanka (PUCSL) to 16 April, after the lawyer representing the Ceylon Electricity Board (CEB) requested a fresh date, as he was unable to be present in Court.   

Nine accused are cited in the case filed by the PUCSL, with the CEB being listed as the first accused. The other accused are CEB directors. The PUCSL decided to file a case against the CEB after it commenced power cuts last month, contending that the power monopoly failed to get permission from the PUCSL and notify it ahead of the load shedding. 

Last week, the Fort Magistrate issued notice to the CEB to be present in court on 9 April. However, last Thursday, the CEB filed a motion requesting a new date, claiming its lawyer was unavailable on 9 April. When the case was taken up on Tuesday, the judge agreed to fix the case for 16 April, which will be the first working day after the New Year. 

On 29 March, the PUCSL filed the case on the basis that the CEB had failed to submit daily power generation reports to the regulator, as required by law. The regulator states that the licensee had not given its reports since 27 May last year.

The PUCSL argues that it was unable to exercise the powers vested in it by the Legislature, and take effective decisions to regulate the power sector, because of the CEB’s failure to submit the reports. This has created serious issues for many parties, and has also contributed to the present power crisis and the inconveniences faced by consumers, the PUCSL further claims, pointing out that the omission amounted to an offence under the PUCSL Act No 35 of 2002.

However, the CEB has argued that it was not the institution’s fault, as the Government had failed to implement new power projects to meet demand as required, and the CEB had no choice but to proceed with load shedding, as it was unable to meet demand. 


Share This Article

Facebook Twitter


DISCLAIMER:

1. All comments will be moderated by the Daily FT Web Editor.

2. Comments that are abusive, obscene, incendiary, defamatory or irrelevant will not be published.

3. We may remove hyperlinks within comments.

4. Kindly use a genuine email ID and provide your name.

5. Spamming the comments section under different user names may result in being blacklisted.

COMMENTS

Today's Columnists

Difference between a woman and a man (yin and yang) and finding solutions to violence in society

Thursday, 18 July 2019

This is not at all a philosophical discourse on gender differences, or the complementary roles of yin and yang (women and men) in social or biological formation. This is also not to speak about who is superior among the two. This is just an observati


I wish Sajith Premadasa had taken up a challenging ministry to showcase his prowess

Thursday, 18 July 2019

Expectations, father and son Sajith Premadasa has put his hands up for leadership in the party and for nomination by the United National Party in the forthcoming presidential elections. I wish Sajith had tested himself, and had given the public a cha


Foreign Affairs and Defence to be one portfolio?

Thursday, 18 July 2019

Unless we are all suffering from dementia, the last experience with a foreign military on our soil should be very clear in our heads. The Indian Peace Keeping Force landed in Sri Lanka to supposedly bring peace to the war-torn country when the LTTE t


Federer lessons for Sri Lanka tourism

Thursday, 18 July 2019

The Wimbledon Men’s Final in 2008 was termed as the best match the world has seen between the two arch rivals Federer and Nadal. But, what we saw last Sunday between the two of them after 11 years sure shocked the world. Many just asked the questio


Columnists More