Home / News/ Amnesty applauds AG decision to recommence investigations into Trinco 5 murders

Amnesty applauds AG decision to recommence investigations into Trinco 5 murders


Comments / {{hitsCtrl.values.hits}} Views / Saturday, 10 August 2019 00:00

Facebook

 


 

  • But warns reforms required if probes are to be affective
  • Calls to amend Assistance to and Protection of Victims of Crime and Witnesses Act of 2015 to encourage witnesses   

Amnesty International yesterday welcomed the decision of the Attorney General to recommence investigations into the killing of five Tamil students – known as the ‘Trinco 5’ – allegedly by the Sri Lankan security forces in Trincomalee on 2 January 2006.

However, Amnesty says reforms are required if the investigations are to be effective.

The decision follows the acquittal of 13 Special Task Force (STF) suspects earlier this month, reportedly due to a “lack of evidence”.

Amnesty International notes the importance of a thorough, effective and impartial investigation into the killing to ensure that victims of human rights violations and abuses can access justice.

The Government of Sri Lanka has an obligation under international law to deliver justice to the victims of the killings – either through the domestic court system, or through a judicial mechanism with a special counsel to investigate allegations of violations of international human rights law and international humanitarian law, which the Government proposed to establish in UN Human Rights Council resolution 30/1 (2015), Amnesty International said. Amnesty International also urged the Government of Sri Lanka to strengthen witness protection and mutual legal assistance from countries where witnesses and victims may now reside, in order to effectively investigate the killings and pursue accountability for the ‘Trinco 5’.

A journalist who took photographs of the bodies, Subramaniyam Sugirdharajan, was killed a few weeks later.

Dr. K. Manoharan, whose son Ragihar was one of the victims, was forced to flee the country after receiving death threats and continues to voice fears of reprisals against those who give evidence in the case.

The families of the other victims, including two youths who survived the attack were also forced to flee Sri Lanka.

In particular, in light of the legitimate security concerns of witnesses and victims to the case, the Government of Sri Lanka should amend the Assistance to and Protection of Victims of Crime and Witnesses Act of 2015 to further facilitate the participation of witnesses and victims outside of Sri Lanka.

Such reform should seek to amend the law beyond the facilitation of recording evidence or statements remotely from a Sri Lankan diplomatic mission in the country from where a victim of crime or witness seeks to testify or make the statement.

 


Share This Article

Facebook Twitter


DISCLAIMER:

1. All comments will be moderated by the Daily FT Web Editor.

2. Comments that are abusive, obscene, incendiary, defamatory or irrelevant will not be published.

3. We may remove hyperlinks within comments.

4. Kindly use a genuine email ID and provide your name.

5. Spamming the comments section under different user names may result in being blacklisted.

COMMENTS

Today's Columnists

The Presidential Election: Into anarchy or out of anarchy?

Saturday, 24 August 2019

In politics there are no absolute truths, rights or wrongs: all is relative. Politics is about choices and alternatives. It is also the art of the possible. The best policy for the people is to work through the give


We need to challenge climate change doubters before it is too late

Friday, 23 August 2019

Imagine a London where the entire subterranean region is engulfed with dirty water. Crammed train carriages that once barrelled along 249 miles of track transporting busy office workers, builders, teachers, civil servants, cleaners and students now r


The Provincial Council Elections – The charade goes on

Friday, 23 August 2019

Originally the SLPP was keen to hold the Provincial Council Elections (PCE) immediately after the Local Government Election results as they felt the PCE would go in their favour. PCE were held under the Proportional Representation system. The relevan


The presidency and the dilemma of the Presidential Election

Friday, 23 August 2019

J.R. Jayewardene created a presidential system not because the parliamentary system of governance that preceded it had failed. He wanted to take over all the powers of the State and assume the status of ancient kings who ruled the country in the past


Columnists More

Special Report

SPECIAL REPORT MORE