Adequate laws exist to deal with hate speech

Monday, 24 June 2019 00:23 -     - {{hitsCtrl.values.hits}}

 

From left: BASL Treasurer Nalin Chandika De Silva, Deputy Solicitor General Azad Navavi, Deputy Inspector General of Police Ajith Rohana, BASL President Kalinga Indatissa PC, BASL Deputy President Shavindra Fernando PC, BASL Secretary Kaushalya Nawaratne, and Asst. Secretary Vishwa De Livera Tennakoon, seen during the public seminar on arrest detention under normal law, PTA, and emergency regulations organised by the Bar Association Sri Lanka at BMICH recently - Pic by Chamila Karunarathne



Public seminar on arrest detention under normal law, PTA and emergency regulations

 

  • BASL President says hate speech on social media can be dealt with
  • Posts of walls of FB amount to publication
  • Urges AG’s Department to file test cases
  • Says same rules must apply to everyone, irrespective of their community

     

By Chandani Kirinde

There are adequate provisions in the existing law to deal with hate speech, Bar Association of Sri Lanka (BASL) President Kalinga Indatissa said recently.

Speaking at public seminar conducted by the BASL at the BMICH, Indatissa said that if authorities want to seriously curtail hate speech, it can be done under Section 3 of the ICCPR Act and Act No. 14 of 1995 (the Evidence Ordinance).

“Police have a misconception that posts on social media cannot be dealt with. That is wrong. If I speak and if my speech falls under Section 3 of the ICCPR Act, you can prosecute me. What about a post on wall of Facebook which is also public? If you seriously want to curtain hate speech, we can bring that under Act No. 14 of 1995,” the BASL President said.

He explained that anything on Facebook or other social media, which is an electronic medium, in his opinion can be dealt with. “A posting on a wall of Facebook is equal to a publication, the only difference is the manner of publication. There is also a difference is the method of proof but relevant authorities should start filing test cases. Act No. 14 of 1995 will be endorsed by the court at some point of time,” he said.

Indatissa said that social media platforms such as Facebook, which advocates freedom of expression is abused, and some people use these to spread hatred targeting communities. “Whether it’s community A, B, C or D, it is wrong. The same rules must apply to everyone. As a multi-ethnic country we must learn to respect each other and live peacefully.”

The BASL President explained the background to the ICCPR Act which was passed by Parliament in 2007. “The General Assembly of the United Nations adopted the ICCPR on 15 December 1966 and the Act came into effect on 23 March 1976. Sri Lanka acceded to the Covenant on 11 June 1980.” 

Indatissa explained that when a country becomes a signatory to the Covenant under the UN, there is a requirement for the country to draft its domestic law to suit the Covenant and Sri Lanka passed the ICCPR Act in 2007, recognising fundamental rights of all Sri Lankans.

However, he said this law has been very badly drafted. “Any law introducing a fundamental right which is already not recognised must first introduce the fundamental rights but here what it says is. No person shall propagate war or advocate national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence.”

He said the law does not say clearly what advocating is in terms of this Act. “Because there is no statutory definition of the term advocating, when a Police officer arrest a person, he must decide if the person who has a document, for example, is advocating incitement to discrimination.”

He said an incitement to discrimination could be an instance where a person refuses to employ another because he or she belongs to a particular community. “If I make an oral statement that I am not giving a particular person a job because he is a Sinhalese or a Muslim, I am liable to be punished under this law. An oral statement is enough as you advocate hatred. If I publish the same too, I am liable for punishment.”

The BASL President said he firmly believes that Sri Lanka is a multi-ethnic country, at least for the last 700 years, and it is a fact that no one can deny. “We are all one and if we are all one, we must learn to live either through the operation of law or through our own human conduct,” Indatissa added while emphasising the huge role the media has to play in any nation in bringing people together in the context of a multi-ethnic society.

He also said that while laws can be tight there can be no room for abuses and if an abuse takes place a judicial pro-activist must step in.

The public seminar by the BASL was on ‘Arrest and Detention under Normal Law, Prevention of Terrorism Act (PTA) and Emergency Regulations’. It highlighted the provisions of the PTA, the ICCPR Act and the role of the Sri Lankan Police and duties of the country’s citizens, when upholding Law and Order and National Security.

The panel comprised of President’s Counsel and BASL Deputy President Shavindra Fernando; Deputy Solicitor General Azad Navavi; Deputy Inspector General and Attorney at Law Kamal Silva; and Deputy Inspector General and Attorney at Law Ajith Rohana.

COMMENTS