Home / Letters to the Editor/ Ranil’s personal visits – Correspondence

Ranil’s personal visits – Correspondence

Comments / {{hitsCtrl.values.hits}} Views / Friday, 7 July 2017 00:00

I am compelled to add my own views again to the ongoing correspondence on the above subject, sparked off by the initial writing of Ruwan Fernando to which I added a rejoinder and thereafter C. Ramachandra wrote elucidating further on the PM’s visits, in response to which you commented, “Daily FT objectively endeavours to provide a platform for expression of different views including multiple views praising the current leaders and administration.”

It is a lofty ideal you profess to follow but I cannot help but agree with Ramachandra that the Editor of a newspaper is also duty bound to publish what is truthful and not merely to accommodate the comments of a reader or a correspondent particularly if they pertain to another person or an institution. 

This is very succinctly illustrated by what happened at CNN, which Ramachandra also referred to in his letter. If I may quote Brian Stelter in the CNN Media newsletter published on 27 June: 

“An internal investigation by CNN management found that some standard editorial processes were not followed when the article was published, people briefed on the results of the investigation said. The story, which reported that Congress was investigating a ‘Russian investment fund with ties to Trump officials,’ cited a single anonymous source. These types of stories are typically reviewed by several departments within CNN – including fact-checkers, journalism standards experts and lawyers – before publication.”

The publishers cannot escape the responsibility for libel if any damaging or vilifying remarks on a person are included in a letter or article merely because they are the views of a reader and I found Ruwan Fernando’s letter contains such denigrating insinuations on the PM which are not factually correct. This prompted me to respond to Fernando initially. 

Your statement that ‘Daily FT objectively endeavours to provide a platform for expression of different views including multiple views praising the current leaders and administration’ is somewhat hazy because a high street newspaper like the prestigious Daily FT should endeavour to publish what is right, truthful and factual and not merely to provide a platform to different views including those praising current leaders as you wish to emphasize. 

I hope this too will be published though it is somewhat divergent to your views.

T. Mallawatantri

Share This Article


Today's Columnists

Mangala’s Mangala Budget – Part 2: Go for reforms but permanently fix the country’s rising debt prob

Monday, 20 November 2017

Mangala’s Mangala Budget was approved in its Second Reading by a two-thirds majority in Parliament last week.

Improving the quality of policy proposals in the Budget

Monday, 20 November 2017

Every Budget Speech includes complex policy measures. Given the traditions associated with the Budget Speech, it is not possible to conduct public consultations on each of the measures beforehand.

Today’s bonding with Bhagavad-Gita

Monday, 20 November 2017

We live in times of moral complexity. Whose deed is more pernicious, a burglar raiding the vault or the cop who wipes away the burglar’s fingerprints?

Is Iran a threat to global peace?

Saturday, 18 November 2017

The aim of this article is to explore Iran’s nuclear program and its consequences throughout the world. Iran one of the nuclear power countries in the Middle East, which has brought very grave concern to the US.

Columnists More