Home / International/ Supreme Court extends term of arbitrators in Ayodhya temple dispute

Supreme Court extends term of arbitrators in Ayodhya temple dispute


Comments / {{hitsCtrl.values.hits}} Views / Saturday, 11 May 2019 00:01

Facebook

People Look At A Model Of A Proposed Ram Temple That Hindu Groups Want To Build At A Disputed Religious Site In Ayodhya In Uttar Pradesh, India - Reuters

 

NEW DELHI (Reuters): The Supreme Court on Friday extended by three months the term of a panel arbitrating a decades-long dispute over plans to build a Hindu temple on the ruins of a 16th-century mosque in the northern town of Ayodhya.

The extension makes the contentious issue less likely to fuel religious tension during a seven-phase general election that started on 11 April, with votes set to be counted on 23 May.

The panel has been given until 15 Aug., Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi said, raising hopes for an amicable settlement of India’s biggest religious dispute, with a history of unleashing riots in many parts of the country.

 “There was a plea from the mediators’ panel to extend the term until 15 Aug and we have agreed,” Gogoi said after receiving a preliminary report from the panel.

The extension came after the panel, set up in March with an initial deadline of eight weeks and headed by former judge F. M. Kalifulla, handed over the report, which was not made public.

Months before the election, Hindu allies of Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) had ratcheted up their demand for a temple to be built at the site many Hindus consider to be the birthplace of a revered deity, Lord Ram.

But just ahead of the election, conservative Hindu groups put the temple plan on the backburner.

A violent Hindu mob destroyed the mosque in Ayodhya in 1992, triggering riots that killed about 2,000 people in one of the worst episodes of sectarian violence since India’s partition from Pakistan at independence from colonial rule in 1947.

Since the mosque demolition, the Supreme Court has kept control of the site in India’s most populous state of Uttar Pradesh, which sends the largest number of MPs to parliament.

The Supreme Court, which had been weighing petitions from both Hindu and Muslim communities over what should be built in Ayodhya, set up the arbitration panel on 8 March.

Hindu groups say there was a temple at the site in Ayodhya before the mosque was erected by a Muslim ruler in 1528.

The dispute has fuelled tension and ill-feeling between majority Hindus and the Muslim minority, which makes up about 14% of India’s population of 1.3 billion.


Share This Article

Facebook Twitter


DISCLAIMER:

1. All comments will be moderated by the Daily FT Web Editor.

2. Comments that are abusive, obscene, incendiary, defamatory or irrelevant will not be published.

3. We may remove hyperlinks within comments.

4. Kindly use a genuine email ID and provide your name.

5. Spamming the comments section under different user names may result in being blacklisted.

COMMENTS

Today's Columnists

Religion is a problem in Sri Lanka; can it be a solution?

Saturday, 17 August 2019

Generally, it is expected that religion should be a solution to a problem. Ironically in Sri Lanka religion is the problem. Therefore, what would be the solution? When religion becomes a problem of a country....


Orthodoxy and change: A perennial Muslim issue

Saturday, 17 August 2019

Whether Muslims live as minorities in non-Muslim countries or as majorities in a total of fifty seven countries, the clash of orthodoxy with modern challenges is a perennial issue that bedevils progress on several fronts in these communities.


Making the MCC Compact work for Sri Lanka

Friday, 16 August 2019

It is a sign of these political times that even an apolitical issue like a foreign aid program becomes a hot topic in Sri Lanka. In April 2019, the Board of Directors of the Millennium Challenge Corporation (MCC) approved a compact program for Sri La


Sri Lanka needs a president hungry for success, not power

Friday, 16 August 2019

The late John F. Kennedy described politics as a “noble adventure, an adventure in which one joins hands with the masses for the service of man”. Not that the Kennedys didn’t play “politricks” in their heyday. But playing “politricks” w


Columnists More

Special Report

SPECIAL REPORT MORE