Home / International/ Supreme Court extends term of arbitrators in Ayodhya temple dispute

Supreme Court extends term of arbitrators in Ayodhya temple dispute

Comments / {{hitsCtrl.values.hits}} Views / Saturday, 11 May 2019 00:01


People Look At A Model Of A Proposed Ram Temple That Hindu Groups Want To Build At A Disputed Religious Site In Ayodhya In Uttar Pradesh, India - Reuters


NEW DELHI (Reuters): The Supreme Court on Friday extended by three months the term of a panel arbitrating a decades-long dispute over plans to build a Hindu temple on the ruins of a 16th-century mosque in the northern town of Ayodhya.

The extension makes the contentious issue less likely to fuel religious tension during a seven-phase general election that started on 11 April, with votes set to be counted on 23 May.

The panel has been given until 15 Aug., Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi said, raising hopes for an amicable settlement of India’s biggest religious dispute, with a history of unleashing riots in many parts of the country.

 “There was a plea from the mediators’ panel to extend the term until 15 Aug and we have agreed,” Gogoi said after receiving a preliminary report from the panel.

The extension came after the panel, set up in March with an initial deadline of eight weeks and headed by former judge F. M. Kalifulla, handed over the report, which was not made public.

Months before the election, Hindu allies of Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) had ratcheted up their demand for a temple to be built at the site many Hindus consider to be the birthplace of a revered deity, Lord Ram.

But just ahead of the election, conservative Hindu groups put the temple plan on the backburner.

A violent Hindu mob destroyed the mosque in Ayodhya in 1992, triggering riots that killed about 2,000 people in one of the worst episodes of sectarian violence since India’s partition from Pakistan at independence from colonial rule in 1947.

Since the mosque demolition, the Supreme Court has kept control of the site in India’s most populous state of Uttar Pradesh, which sends the largest number of MPs to parliament.

The Supreme Court, which had been weighing petitions from both Hindu and Muslim communities over what should be built in Ayodhya, set up the arbitration panel on 8 March.

Hindu groups say there was a temple at the site in Ayodhya before the mosque was erected by a Muslim ruler in 1528.

The dispute has fuelled tension and ill-feeling between majority Hindus and the Muslim minority, which makes up about 14% of India’s population of 1.3 billion.

Share This Article

Facebook Twitter


1. All comments will be moderated by the Daily FT Web Editor.

2. Comments that are abusive, obscene, incendiary, defamatory or irrelevant will not be published.

3. We may remove hyperlinks within comments.

4. Kindly use a genuine email ID and provide your name.

5. Spamming the comments section under different user names may result in being blacklisted.


Today's Columnists

A case for reviewing plantation management

Thursday, 23 May 2019

Last week, I elaborated on ‘Going Beyond Agronomic Research for Plantation Reform’ with the aim of beginning a conversation on the importance of non-agronomic research to understand the many problematic areas that plague the plantation sector, in

How are we doing in e-government?

Thursday, 23 May 2019

It is customary to assess some aspect of the performance of a country using a composite index such as the Ease of Doing Business Index or the Network Readiness Index. For government services, there is the e-Government Development Index (EGDI), issued

National introspection in the aftermath

Thursday, 23 May 2019

“The immediate task for the Government is to guaranty the safety and security of all innocent Muslims and prevent a recurrence of 1983 … One cannot eradicate one evil with another” – Anatomy of an Islamist Infamy (III), CT, 9 May. In this, th

AI + BI + CI x DI = Empowering, enriching and impacting society and environmental wellbeing

Thursday, 23 May 2019

There has never been a time like today where many are raising concerns for society’s wellbeing, survival and thriving, despite many progressive advancements in the digitally transformed world. We are already in the so-called Fourth Industrial Revo

Columnists More