Home / FT View Editorial/ Presidential pardons

Presidential pardons


Comments / {{hitsCtrl.values.hits}} Views / Thursday, 24 October 2019 00:16


Presidential pardons are part of the powers given to the Executive President, which also comes with wide discretionary powers on how they can be used. But many are concerned that using presidential pardons can undermine the rule of law and the independence of the Judiciary. 

President Maithripala Sirisena already used his still considerable powers earlier this year when he released Bodu Bala Sena (BBS) General Secretary Galagod Aththe Gnanasara Thero and has expressed interest in using it a second time to release Royal Park murder convict Shramantha Jude Anthony Jayamaha. 

The Royal Park Murder refers to the high-profile murder of a young woman at the Royal Park luxury apartment complex in Rajagiriya, on 30 June 2005. The case gained a lot of media attention in Sri Lanka at the time because of the brutality that snuffed out a young life. The case went through the legal process for a number of years and a life sentence was eventually handed down. The matter appeared closed but the latest attempt to secure the murderer’s release through the use of a presidential pardon has sparked much criticism in the public domain. 

The legal process exists to deal with crimes and to ensure that the guilty parties are punished. There can be instances when justice is miscarried and it may then be necessary to intervene to correct the situation but that also needs to be done from within the legal framework. The verdict in the Royal Park murder case was delivered after numerous rounds of hearings and later upheld despite an appeal process. There has been no indication of a miscarriage of justice that warrants any external intervention from the President. 

When the BBS General Secretary was released there was an uproar about the President undermining the rule of law and overriding a court decision through a presidential pardon. The same argument stands true at this point as well. The judicial system must operate, and must be seen to be operating, in an independent and efficient manner. The rich and the powerful cannot be allowed to sidestep this process not just because it is morally and ethically wrong, but also because confidence in the legal system will be destroyed. 

Moreover, there is evidence to show that Jayamaha had a history of violent behaviour, which culminated in the horrific murder. Releasing such a dangerous person back into society should not be taken lightly no matter what education he has managed to gather in the interim. The victim’s family has already come out in protest and it is disheartening and sad that they cannot find closure and move forward even 15 years after this terrible incident but must instead continue their battle for justice. The sister of the victim has pointed out that contrary to President Sirisena’s assertion that the murder happened as a result of an argument, there were clear signs of premeditation. Seemingly reducing the severity of a crime and seeking to find reasons to release the offender is not an act that should be considered by a Head of State. 

With just about three weeks to go before President Sirisena’s term ends, the focus should be about leaving the presidency on a moral high. Not by signing off on an act that will undermine the rule of law, destroy lives and anger and endanger the public.  


Share This Article

Facebook Twitter


DISCLAIMER:

1. All comments will be moderated by the Daily FT Web Editor.

2. Comments that are abusive, obscene, incendiary, defamatory or irrelevant will not be published.

3. We may remove hyperlinks within comments.

4. Kindly use a genuine email ID and provide your name.

5. Spamming the comments section under different user names may result in being blacklisted.

COMMENTS

Today's Columnists

Tourism ahoy!

Monday, 27 January 2020

I was making my way out of the Cinnamon Grand Hotel lobby when I heard someone calling out my name. It was a heavy European accent and for an uncomfortable moment I could not recognise the caller seated in the lounge chair. Then, it connected, Robert


World war III is not US vs. Iraq

Monday, 27 January 2020

World War III is the longest war yet and probably the final end game. This war is not the war between the US and Iraq. World War facts History states that World War I began in 1914 with Germany, Austria-Hungary, Bulgaria and the Ottoman Empire (the


A child’s guide to price determination in the market: Tax cuts won’t always reduce prices

Monday, 27 January 2020

Asani has been an alert student reading for her Advanced Level exam. She is an inquisitive student and makes it her business to probe into matters that are economics about which she has no clear understanding. Fortunately, her Grandfather – Sarath


Bitter reality of a battered fraction: ‘Vishama Bhaga’ displays the ‘Other Half’

Monday, 27 January 2020

I was surprised to hear that the first time in Sri Lankan cinema, a movie had won 50 awards and yet has not received the needed recognition from us. It is the first Sinhala film produced by a Buddihst monk with the noble aim of donating the entire pr


Columnists More