Home / FT View Editorial/ Need for new thinking

Need for new thinking


Comments / {{hitsCtrl.values.hits}} Views / Tuesday, 10 September 2019 00:04

Facebook

Sri Lanka Podujana Peramuna (SLPP) presidential hopeful Gotabaya Rajapaksa on Sunday laid out an extensive blueprint of his plans to develop Sri Lanka. One aspect that was mentioned in the lengthy speech was import substitution for selected agriculture sectors. 

The concept of import substitution is an old one in Sri Lanka and was extensively practiced for decades since Independence, including during the ‘Mahinda Chinthana’ days of Opposition Leader Mahinda Rajapaksa. But it has had mixed results. 

Import substitution generally involves imposing higher tariffs on selected items. But the result is often not an improvement in quality or competitiveness. This is because the tariffs take away any incentive for those involved in that production to be efficient and, particularly in Sri Lanka simply provides a large chunk of earnings to the middle man. 

This means not only does the consumer have to pay higher prices for goods, the producer does not benefit from the higher tariff as it does not provide technological advances or other techniques to be more efficient and competitive. 

Sri Lanka’s rice sector is a good example of this. Even though Sri Lanka has been self-sufficient in rice for over a decade the famers are still heavily dependent on the fertiliser subsidy and struggle to be competitive. Without a captive local market they would not be able to earn through exports. This is also the reason why tariffs imposed for import substitution are difficult because they disproportionately impact the poor.       

For decades, the dairy industry has been one of the most protected sectors in Sri Lanka, but even after absorbing huge amounts of public funds, it remains one of the least efficient and most contentious segments of the economy. Caught in the crosshairs of politics, bad decision-making, mismanagement, and outdated economic thinking, the dairy industry is a microcosm of how interventionist economic practices can harm both consumer and producer. 

On the surface, successive Governments have justified billions of rupees worth of subsidies to the sector, on the basis that Sri Lanka spends over Rs. 40 billion annually to import milk powder, and have argued that import substitution would save the country precious foreign exchange while meeting nutrition needs. But this has had limited success, as the local industry has failed to be competitive. This is also why milk products such as cheese are expensive in the local market, despite the existence of large-scale local producers.

As part of the Government’s import substitution program, particularly under former President Mahinda Rajapaksa’s administration, the State spent billions of rupees on importing thousands of dairy cows, and handed them out to small farmers in select areas of the country. 

However, farmer associations and experts have since pointed out that these cows do not suit the Sri Lankan climate, and farmers are forced to spend significant amounts of money on their upkeep. Large numbers have perished over the years, and those left produce smaller volumes of milk than initially projected. After many trials and failures, milk production has improved, but little investment was made in establishing efficient delivery systems to consumers. 

Value chains are important for an industry to become competitive and deliver high quality products to consumers at reasonable cost. It is absolutely important to support the agriculture sector, which employs 27% of the country’s population, even though it only provides about 7% of GDP. 

But the inefficient gap needs a diverse, long term and data driven policy approach to be successful. A dressed up version of old policies will not be sufficient and it would be refreshing to see more substantive policies from a presidential contender. 

 


Share This Article

Facebook Twitter


DISCLAIMER:

1. All comments will be moderated by the Daily FT Web Editor.

2. Comments that are abusive, obscene, incendiary, defamatory or irrelevant will not be published.

3. We may remove hyperlinks within comments.

4. Kindly use a genuine email ID and provide your name.

5. Spamming the comments section under different user names may result in being blacklisted.

COMMENTS

Today's Columnists

Economy, business community and the Prime Minister

Friday, 20 September 2019

The speech made by Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe as the Chief Guest of the Sri Lanka Economic Summit 2019 deserves very careful consideration by the country due to several reasons. This will no doubt be his last speech on economic policy to be


Sri Lanka needs to invest more on soft infrastructure

Friday, 20 September 2019

Developing countries like Sri Lanka will have to prepare for further downside risks in 2020 with the growing debt problems and the growth problems in Europe and the slowdown in Asia. Slower growth is already visible in weakening global trade and comm


Origins, rise and irrelevance of SLMC

Friday, 20 September 2019

Andreas Johansson’s ‘Pragmatic Muslim Politics: The Case of Sri Lanka Muslim Congress,’ Switzerland: Springer, 2019, is the latest piece of academic research on SLMC, based on Parliamentary Hansards, official party documents and information rec


Questions about Speaker’s candidacy for the presidency?

Friday, 20 September 2019

It is rather unfortunate that Mr. Karu Jayasuriya has issued a statement (17 September), as the Speaker, ‘that he is willing and ready to contest the Presidential Election, on the request of some organisations and individuals, including Maha Sangha


Columnists More