Home / FT View Editorial/ Discipline is not democracy

Discipline is not democracy

Comments / {{hitsCtrl.values.hits}} Views / Saturday, 16 February 2019 00:10


In a recent interview, former Defence Ministry Secretary and presidential-hopeful Gotabaya Rajapaksa had outlined his views on why Sri Lanka has failed to achieve its potential and continues to struggle in almost all aspects of its social, cultural and economic spheres. He attributed this failure to lack of discipline insisting that if discipline was instilled then the country would return to working order and the ensuing development would be positive for the people. 

His argument is a powerful and pervasive one because on the surface there does appear to be a breakdown of discipline. For the average citizen, burned by high cost of living, few opportunities, low economic growth and frustrated by the incompetence of his elected representatives, would be tempted to agree that Sri Lanka has become a country where discipline does not matter. 

Over the last decade or even longer the public has become increasingly intolerant of its political representatives who are often derided for being incompetent, corrupt, wasteful and ignorant. The policies they champion are not based on fact or global trends or innovation but to further political agendas, especially when elections are around the corner. They use hard-earned tax rupees with little concern and accountability.

The public scorn is most palpable when parliamentarians or politicians at lower levels give themselves fancy cars, commissions and other perks. Details of corruption investigations, details of State-Owned Enterprise (SOE) losses and even details of drug busts have unearthed the unholy link politics has to almost every segment of Sri Lankan life. 

Living in a country that is moving past its demographic dividend, burdened with daunting levels of debt and unable to restructure its economy to improve exports and investments, is daunting at best. The last four years in particular have been disappointing as the “Yahapalanaya” Government was elected on a platform of fighting corruption, promoting reconciliation and fostering growth. With its term ticking to a close voters are wondering where the country could go next, and a new candidate would be an exciting prospect, provided he or she has the right policies. 

But what Sri Lankans must remember is that discipline is not necessarily doing the right thing. Discipline is merely a process of enforcing obedience, and that enforcement can be both brutal and repressive as well as functional. The Webster Dictionary defines discipline as, “to punish or penalise for the sake of enforcing obedience and perfecting moral character.” Discipline can be exerted with the aim of improving moral character but it does not ensure that it becomes so. Discipline is dicey enough for an individual but how would it be applied to a country? 

Sri Lanka for all its flaws is a democracy. This means the country will follow the Constitution, respect the rule of law, each citizen will have his rights respected, institutions will be strengthened, governance improved and accountability entrenched. Sri Lanka should aspire to be a country with a vibrant democracy supported by progressive institutions. 

Giving into the illusion that discipline would make the situation better and in one swoop deliver the aspirations of a population is dangerous and could have serious consequences. An aspirant to high office should put democracy at the centre of their policies.  Discipline can bring about dictatorships but a genuine democracy achieves freedom.

Share This Article

Facebook Twitter


1. All comments will be moderated by the Daily FT Web Editor.

2. Comments that are abusive, obscene, incendiary, defamatory or irrelevant will not be published.

3. We may remove hyperlinks within comments.

4. Kindly use a genuine email ID and provide your name.

5. Spamming the comments section under different user names may result in being blacklisted.


Today's Columnists

Economy, business community and the Prime Minister

Friday, 20 September 2019

The speech made by Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe as the Chief Guest of the Sri Lanka Economic Summit 2019 deserves very careful consideration by the country due to several reasons. This will no doubt be his last speech on economic policy to be

Sri Lanka needs to invest more on soft infrastructure

Friday, 20 September 2019

Developing countries like Sri Lanka will have to prepare for further downside risks in 2020 with the growing debt problems and the growth problems in Europe and the slowdown in Asia. Slower growth is already visible in weakening global trade and comm

Origins, rise and irrelevance of SLMC

Friday, 20 September 2019

Andreas Johansson’s ‘Pragmatic Muslim Politics: The Case of Sri Lanka Muslim Congress,’ Switzerland: Springer, 2019, is the latest piece of academic research on SLMC, based on Parliamentary Hansards, official party documents and information rec

Questions about Speaker’s candidacy for the presidency?

Friday, 20 September 2019

It is rather unfortunate that Mr. Karu Jayasuriya has issued a statement (17 September), as the Speaker, ‘that he is willing and ready to contest the Presidential Election, on the request of some organisations and individuals, including Maha Sangha

Columnists More