Home / FT View Editorial/ CCEM and NEC

CCEM and NEC


Comments / {{hitsCtrl.values.hits}} Views / Monday, 21 October 2019 00:00


Efficient and effective institutions are integral to ensuring that any democracy is a well-functioning one. However, when institutions are undermined it becomes increasingly difficult to ensure engagement, draft good policy, and ensure that the priorities of a Government are implemented. 

When this Government came into power in 2015, the Cabinet Committee on Economic Management (CCEM) was formed. But this quickly ran into problems, as President Maithripala Sirisena and other Cabinet members from the Sri Lanka Freedom Party (SLFP) felt that they were being left out of the decision-making process. They argued that having another body decide on key policies and projects and only put it before Cabinet to be rubber-stamped was undermining the role of Cabinet. Their view was that Cabinet should remain a space where discussions took place openly between the different Cabinet members, and the CCEM ran contrary to the collective nature of Cabinet meetings as well as the principles of collective responsibility. 

The CCEM was also accused of engaging in closed-door policymaking where key projects such as the East Container Terminal (ECT) were considered, but despite calling for tenders and the lapse of many months the project never moved forward. There was little clarity on what happened to the bid process and why the CCEM eventually decided to put the project on the backburner. Some other projects such as the controversial Volkswagen plant, despite being approved by the CCEM and subsequently by Cabinet, were never implemented. 

Eventually, President Sirisena intervened and demanded the CCEM be dismantled and a National Economic Council (NEC) be established instead. The argument was that it would provide a platform to bring together both policymakers and other officials to ensure that projects are evaluated on merit, and their implementation process tracked. But the NEC proved to as ineffective as its predecessor, with little transparency, and failed to counter questionable projects as well. 

Now President Sirisena, who initially established the NEC, has submitted a proposal to Cabinet to dismantle the same entity, citing the absence of officials and its general inefficiency as grounds to get rid of it. In the Cabinet memorandum, he has stated that the official who headed the NEC was rarely in Sri Lanka, despite being paid a handsome Rs. 500,000 salary. With President Sirisena’s term also coming to an end in November, and the new President likely to prefer establishing his own systems of governance the disappearance of the NEC is inevitable.    

But the fates of both the CCEM and the NEC serve as good lessons for policymakers. Inefficient decision-making and implementation processes have plagued this administration for years, resulting in the oft-heard refrain “what has this government done?” Closed-door decision-making, creating entities to undermine existing institutions, and reducing institutions into battlefields for political agendas needs to stop. Institutions and their powers have to be respected. 

Political leaders need to appoint responsible and reliable officials to lead institutions, so that they carry out their tasks with transparency and accountability. This is the best way to increase government efficiency and reduce corruption. It is hoped that the respective presidential aspirants are taking note, because fixing governance is critical to Sri Lanka moving forward.

 


Share This Article

Facebook Twitter


DISCLAIMER:

1. All comments will be moderated by the Daily FT Web Editor.

2. Comments that are abusive, obscene, incendiary, defamatory or irrelevant will not be published.

3. We may remove hyperlinks within comments.

4. Kindly use a genuine email ID and provide your name.

5. Spamming the comments section under different user names may result in being blacklisted.

COMMENTS

Today's Columnists

A child’s guide to MCC Compact Sri Lanka

Monday, 18 November 2019

Intelligent children, unlike some of the adults, are curious, probing and questioning. They do not jump to conclusions until and unless they are convinced of facts that have been presented to them. Asani, a student in the Advanced Level class in a le


Re-thinking voting

Saturday, 16 November 2019

We use our vote (in a democracy) to elect those who should govern us. We can only be governed as long as we are alive. Therefore, our current age and life expectancy determine how long we have left to be governed! So, should the younger population, h


Ministry of Religious Affairs and Interfaith Harmony: A nation rich in unity

Friday, 15 November 2019

This series is based on business leader Dhammika Perera’s recently revealed ‘Economic Growth Strategy and Action Plan to increase GDP Per Capita from $ 4,000 to $ 12,000’. The document outlines goals and action plans for 23 ministries and to


Securing a People’s Constitution

Friday, 15 November 2019

The need for making a People’s Constitution has become a topic of interest not only among the public but also among some candidates of the Presidential Election. Rohan Pallewatte and Mahesh Senanayake have included it in their election manifestos.


Columnists More