The post-Parliamentary Election period has been focused on ramping up domestic production as a means to boost growth. But while becoming self-sufficient in rice and having a five-year plan for local industries is a positive step, it does not provide a viable solution to Sri Lanka’s biggest challenge next year, which is meeting debt repayments.
It is true that COVID-19 has exacerbated economic issues, but Sri Lanka has been living beyond its means for decades, and successive governments are responsible. Eminent economists have argued that Sri Lanka’s less-than-ideal track record has brought huge challenges, as the country grapples with how it can meet debt repayments next year, which are expected to be around $4 billion.
Once the conflict was over, the Government borrowed extensively for infrastructure projects, but failed to jumpstart investment and broaden exports. Sri Lanka will meet its debt repayments this year, but unless the COVID-19 situation improves significantly next year, allowing the country to return to international financial markets, its ability to raise funds to repay debt due in 2021 while keeping the rupee at its current levels will be tough.
Until 2023, the Government has to repay an estimated $ 13 billion, which is mostly going to have to come through more debt. This, together with low growth, means Sri Lanka will remain on the knife edge economically for the better part of this decade.Sri Lanka can join international calls for assistance, but it will be just another short-term solution. If the Government is serious about turning around the economy, it will have to initiate difficult reforms that have been kicked down the road by successive governments. Struggling with low public revenue, the Government had started slowly rolling back tax concessions it gave in December, but COVID-19 forced a change of tactics with a refinancing facility. Public revenue needs to grow to about 15% of GDP for Sri Lanka to sustainably fund education, healthcare, housing, and other welfare support needed for as much as 40% of the population. Without taxes, there is simply no other revenue source to achieve this. Another tough but crucial step will be reforming State-owned Enterprises (SOEs). The Government cannot keep funding its losses, but trimming the public sector will be deeply unpopular. Slashing defence allocations, which have remained the highest component of the budget despite the war ending over a decade ago, and rationalising other expenditure, is also important. Strongly connected to this is effectively fighting corruption and proactively promoting transparency, which has received scant attention so far.
Persistent issues such as relatively low ranking in the Doing Business Index, high utility costs compared to regional peers, high costs of land acquisition, and rigidity in labour laws and Government procedures remain the main impediments in terms of attracting FDIs to the country. Sri Lanka needs investment and exports to build reserves and repay debt without relying on more borrowings. So far the signs are that international assistance will be limited, making reforms the only realistic path for the Government should it chose to take the responsible route. Spurring domestic industries is a positive move, but it will need to be underpinned by a wider set of policies that will give confidence to international markets. Only then will the economy be on a truly sustainable path.