Home / FT View/ Getting anti-dumping to work

Getting anti-dumping to work


Comments / {{hitsCtrl.values.hits}} Views / Tuesday, 13 March 2018 00:00


Sri Lanka’s new anti-dumping legislation, which was passed in Parliament earlier this month, aims to protect local industries against unfair competition. It has raised much expectation as local businesses seek to ramp up their legal protection ahead of planned economic liberalisation by the Government.

Anti-dumping legislation has been a long road for Sri Lanka with about 17 years spent on formulating the legal changes. The initiative was finally taken as far as Parliament by the Government, which saw it as a critical need to protect local industries ahead of several Free Trade Agreements (FTAs) and rationalisation of trade tariffs in the pipeline. The first of these FTAs was also signed earlier this year with Singapore and passing anti-dumping legislation is a key requirement ahead of it becoming effective.  

The two new bills will empower the Director General of Commerce of the Department of Commerce to initiate investigations relating to unfair business practices under the legislative provisions of the Trade Remedy Law and effect additional duties, countervailing duties, safeguard action against imports which enter the country under unfair business practices. A high-powered committee consisting of senior officials and ministers of relevant line ministries will also be involved in the process. The legislation broadly follows guidelines and recommendations by the World Trade Organisation (WTO). About 76% of WTO members have some form of anti-dumping legislation.

However, in recent months the US, under President Donald Trump, has led the charge against free trade, calling for stronger measures that go beyond anti-dumping legislation. The raising of steel tariffs, which President Trump signed into law last week, seek to undermine decades of open trade practices and has provoked other countries to hint that they will respond with tit-for-tat measures that could trigger an all-out trade war. 

The difference here is clear. Anti-dumping does not guard against cheap imports, which benefit consumers and give them access to goods at a better price. This is the core give-and-take of free trade that countries sometimes find difficult to control, as they have limited control of vast value chains that span the globe. Sri Lanka, being a small island nation, that is moreover late to liberalise and for decades has maintained para-tariffs as a way to protect random industries with little logical reasoning, could find this distinction difficult to grapple with. Local businesses that expect anti-dumping laws to help them may find that their assistance is less than initially expected. WTO advocates defined specific criteria to determine when a product is to be considered dumped, allowing for competition at a proactive level. 

Therefore, anti-dumping legislation alone, no matter how powerful and well-meaning, cannot tackle the challenge of liberalisation as a stand-alone measure. It is important for local businesses to be aware of this aspect and also for the Government to work on improving its overall ease of doing business initiatives. There may be lots of barriers that make companies non-competitive. It may be institutional inefficiencies, it may be the more macroeconomic environment – e.g. tax policy, infrastructure, lack of information, rules and regulations, complying with various government requirements – all of this can affect competitiveness of markets. This complex set of circumstances, as well as rational diversifying to exports, is all essential to improve Sri Lanka’s limited quota of tradable goods.  


Share This Article


DISCLAIMER:

1. All comments will be moderated by the Daily FT Web Editor.

2. Comments that are abusive, obscene, incendiary, defamatory or irrelevant will not be published.

3. We may remove hyperlinks within comments.

4. Kindly use a genuine email ID and provide your name.

5. Spamming the comments section under different user names may result in being blacklisted.

COMMENTS

Today's Columnists

Tweaking the New Inland Revenue Act (Part II)

Tuesday, 18 December 2018

In the backdrop where the recent amendment to the country’s supreme law is called in question, it may be appropriate to recall that the passage of the new Inland Revenue (IR) Act through Parliament was far more controversial. Nevertheless, the new


Advancing gender parity in Sri Lanka

Tuesday, 18 December 2018

Asia-Pacific today is a true engine of growth in the world—a region that has barely tapped its potential to develop, invest, and innovate. But as the region speeds ahead, the dynamics of its workforce, one that was predominantly male in the past, i


Things to do in a Democracy when you’re dead…

Tuesday, 18 December 2018

In yesterday’s column, I argued a case for not impeaching the chief executive of the coup that has left our country situation in ruins. At the end of a pitched battle between the forces of unconstitutional ambition on one hand and democratic resist


What’s next after the Supreme Court decision?

Tuesday, 18 December 2018

Last Thursday, just before the courts closed for Christmas holidays, the Supreme Court, sticking strictly to a legalistic path, put an end to the controversial issue of defining the powers of President Maithripala Sirisena, leaving the nation to wres


Columnists More