Home / FT Lite/ Challenging and interesting

Challenging and interesting


Comments / {{hitsCtrl.values.hits}} Views / Saturday, 19 January 2019 00:10

Facebook

Senate building now called Republic building

 

Reporting parliamentary proceedings was challenging and interesting. It was challenging because most of the speeches were in English at that time. We had to translate and write the copy straightaway. 

Most – if not all – the English newspaper reporters were proficient in shorthand and often noted down the speeches in shorthand and then typed their reports. To listen to the topmost politicians of the time was very interesting. They came well-prepared, having studied the subject to be debated. 

Covering Parliament was part of the duties of a selected team of reporters. I was in the team from the time I joined the Dinamina news desk. We covered proceedings both in the Senate (Upper House) and the House of Representatives (Lower House). 

The bicameral Legislature was a result of the Soulbury Constitution when the Parliamentary system of government was introduced in 1947. The Senate had 30 members – 15 nominated by the Governor-General and 15 by the House of Representatives. The latter had 101 members – 95 elected by the people and six nominated by the Governor-General to represent the minorities or unrepresented interests.

The House of Reps was at the building used first by the Legislative Council from 1930 and then by the State Council (1931-47), presently the Presidential Secretariat. The Senate building was opposite Gordon Gardens next to President’s House (then Queen’s House). Both were walking distance from Lake House. 

The Third Parliament had begun after the 1956 general election with Mahajana Eksath Peramuna/Sri Lanka Freedom Party (MEP/SLFP) Leader S.W.R.D. Bandaranaike becoming Prime Minister having won 51 seats and Dr. N.M. Perera, Leader of the Lanka Sama Samaja Party (LSSP – 14 seats) elected Leader of the Opposition. The United National Party (UNP) was routed and won only eight seats.



Although the UNP leaders had lost their seats, other parties were well-represented with their stalwarts winning their seats. Thus the debates were well worth listening to. 

Legislation of a far-reaching nature was passed in the first few months but none of them had an easy passage with the Opposition members discussing them at length. Among the early Bills presented was the Sinhala Only Bill or Official Language Bill No. 33 of 1956, making Sinhala the official language. It was the fulfilment of a major election promise by both the MEP and the UNP. 

When the Bill was presented in the House of Reps on 5 June 1956, the Federal Party held a ‘Satyagraha’ at Galle Face Green. Although it created a tense situation the debate in Parliament continued and the Bill was passed on 15 June. 

The MEP and UNP voted for the Bill while the leftist parties (LSSP & Communist Party) and the Tamil parties (Federal Party and All-Ceylon Tamil Congress) demanded parity of status for Sinhala and Tamil and voted against the Bill.

There was an unforgettable incident when a colleague of mine reported the Prime Minister’s speech wrong. The report stated that the PM said that there was no difference between Sinhala Only and parity of status. The PM had called the Managing Director Esmond Wickremasinghe early morning and lambasted him saying that this was how Lake House was sabotaging the Government’s efforts in trying to do something useful for the people. The MD had nothing to say except apologising to the PM promising to carry a correction the following day. My colleague, in the meantime, had realised his mistake and left his resignation and gone away before we came to office.

I was warned that I would have to face an onslaught in Parliament when the PM was going to make a statement. I went and occupied my seat in the Press Box when Parliament met at 2 p.m. With the Speaker’s permission the PM started on the grave mistake done by the Dinamina. All eyes were on the Press Box and looking down I wrote the copy.

Incidentally, the Press Box virtually formed part of the Parliament ‘well’ – the term used for the chamber where the MPs sat. We were in the far corner on the left of the Speaker where the Opposition MPs sat. Opposite the Press Box on the side where the Government MPs sat was the Officials’ Box occupied by secretaries to ministries or other responsible officials. That enabled ministers to consult them whenever they had to reply to questions raised by MPs.

The MPs wore ‘full suit’ or national dress and we had to do the same. We had lockers and we kept the coats in them whenever Parliament sat for a few days at a stretch. 

More to follow.


Share This Article

Facebook Twitter


DISCLAIMER:

1. All comments will be moderated by the Daily FT Web Editor.

2. Comments that are abusive, obscene, incendiary, defamatory or irrelevant will not be published.

3. We may remove hyperlinks within comments.

4. Kindly use a genuine email ID and provide your name.

5. Spamming the comments section under different user names may result in being blacklisted.

COMMENTS

Today's Columnists

Will power cuts solve electricity crisis?

Tuesday, 23 April 2019

The country faced electricity power cuts, reminding citizens of early 1990s, which resulted in private power producers supplying electrical power with long-term power supply agreements. Today, most have completed their agreement period, but some were


Easter attack: Going beyond condemnation

Tuesday, 23 April 2019

Yesterday was Easter Sunday; 227 persons [at the time of writing] have been killed, and many times more injured. The primary targets were churches and international hotels. It seems clear that the extremist group ISIS (Islamic State of Iraq and Syria


Easter Sunday nightmare

Tuesday, 23 April 2019

This is the most important day of the year for Christians – the Peaceful Easter Sunday or Easter Day was shattered by deadly explosions in several Christian churches throughout the country; and we excoriate such hatred in our beloved country. We th


Poignant pondering on a patriarch

Monday, 22 April 2019

Almost five months have gone. It is with a profound sense of sadness that we experienced the demise of our veteran teacher, respected author, legal luminary, an accomplished ambassador, an eminent public servant and an amazing human being, Dr. Wickre


Columnists More