Home / FT Lite/ Challenging and interesting

Challenging and interesting

Comments / {{hitsCtrl.values.hits}} Views / Saturday, 19 January 2019 00:10


Senate building now called Republic building


Reporting parliamentary proceedings was challenging and interesting. It was challenging because most of the speeches were in English at that time. We had to translate and write the copy straightaway. 

Most – if not all – the English newspaper reporters were proficient in shorthand and often noted down the speeches in shorthand and then typed their reports. To listen to the topmost politicians of the time was very interesting. They came well-prepared, having studied the subject to be debated. 

Covering Parliament was part of the duties of a selected team of reporters. I was in the team from the time I joined the Dinamina news desk. We covered proceedings both in the Senate (Upper House) and the House of Representatives (Lower House). 

The bicameral Legislature was a result of the Soulbury Constitution when the Parliamentary system of government was introduced in 1947. The Senate had 30 members – 15 nominated by the Governor-General and 15 by the House of Representatives. The latter had 101 members – 95 elected by the people and six nominated by the Governor-General to represent the minorities or unrepresented interests.

The House of Reps was at the building used first by the Legislative Council from 1930 and then by the State Council (1931-47), presently the Presidential Secretariat. The Senate building was opposite Gordon Gardens next to President’s House (then Queen’s House). Both were walking distance from Lake House. 

The Third Parliament had begun after the 1956 general election with Mahajana Eksath Peramuna/Sri Lanka Freedom Party (MEP/SLFP) Leader S.W.R.D. Bandaranaike becoming Prime Minister having won 51 seats and Dr. N.M. Perera, Leader of the Lanka Sama Samaja Party (LSSP – 14 seats) elected Leader of the Opposition. The United National Party (UNP) was routed and won only eight seats.

Although the UNP leaders had lost their seats, other parties were well-represented with their stalwarts winning their seats. Thus the debates were well worth listening to. 

Legislation of a far-reaching nature was passed in the first few months but none of them had an easy passage with the Opposition members discussing them at length. Among the early Bills presented was the Sinhala Only Bill or Official Language Bill No. 33 of 1956, making Sinhala the official language. It was the fulfilment of a major election promise by both the MEP and the UNP. 

When the Bill was presented in the House of Reps on 5 June 1956, the Federal Party held a ‘Satyagraha’ at Galle Face Green. Although it created a tense situation the debate in Parliament continued and the Bill was passed on 15 June. 

The MEP and UNP voted for the Bill while the leftist parties (LSSP & Communist Party) and the Tamil parties (Federal Party and All-Ceylon Tamil Congress) demanded parity of status for Sinhala and Tamil and voted against the Bill.

There was an unforgettable incident when a colleague of mine reported the Prime Minister’s speech wrong. The report stated that the PM said that there was no difference between Sinhala Only and parity of status. The PM had called the Managing Director Esmond Wickremasinghe early morning and lambasted him saying that this was how Lake House was sabotaging the Government’s efforts in trying to do something useful for the people. The MD had nothing to say except apologising to the PM promising to carry a correction the following day. My colleague, in the meantime, had realised his mistake and left his resignation and gone away before we came to office.

I was warned that I would have to face an onslaught in Parliament when the PM was going to make a statement. I went and occupied my seat in the Press Box when Parliament met at 2 p.m. With the Speaker’s permission the PM started on the grave mistake done by the Dinamina. All eyes were on the Press Box and looking down I wrote the copy.

Incidentally, the Press Box virtually formed part of the Parliament ‘well’ – the term used for the chamber where the MPs sat. We were in the far corner on the left of the Speaker where the Opposition MPs sat. Opposite the Press Box on the side where the Government MPs sat was the Officials’ Box occupied by secretaries to ministries or other responsible officials. That enabled ministers to consult them whenever they had to reply to questions raised by MPs.

The MPs wore ‘full suit’ or national dress and we had to do the same. We had lockers and we kept the coats in them whenever Parliament sat for a few days at a stretch. 

More to follow.

Share This Article

Facebook Twitter


1. All comments will be moderated by the Daily FT Web Editor.

2. Comments that are abusive, obscene, incendiary, defamatory or irrelevant will not be published.

3. We may remove hyperlinks within comments.

4. Kindly use a genuine email ID and provide your name.

5. Spamming the comments section under different user names may result in being blacklisted.


Today's Columnists

Difference between a woman and a man (yin and yang) and finding solutions to violence in society

Thursday, 18 July 2019

This is not at all a philosophical discourse on gender differences, or the complementary roles of yin and yang (women and men) in social or biological formation. This is also not to speak about who is superior among the two. This is just an observati

I wish Sajith Premadasa had taken up a challenging ministry to showcase his prowess

Thursday, 18 July 2019

Expectations, father and son Sajith Premadasa has put his hands up for leadership in the party and for nomination by the United National Party in the forthcoming presidential elections. I wish Sajith had tested himself, and had given the public a cha

Foreign Affairs and Defence to be one portfolio?

Thursday, 18 July 2019

Unless we are all suffering from dementia, the last experience with a foreign military on our soil should be very clear in our heads. The Indian Peace Keeping Force landed in Sri Lanka to supposedly bring peace to the war-torn country when the LTTE t

Federer lessons for Sri Lanka tourism

Thursday, 18 July 2019

The Wimbledon Men’s Final in 2008 was termed as the best match the world has seen between the two arch rivals Federer and Nadal. But, what we saw last Sunday between the two of them after 11 years sure shocked the world. Many just asked the questio

Columnists More