Home / Front Page/ SC holds that HRC recommendations can be challenged in Writ application

SC holds that HRC recommendations can be challenged in Writ application


Comments / {{hitsCtrl.values.hits}} Views / Tuesday, 11 July 2017 00:22

Facebook

By S.S. Selvanayagam

In a landmark judgment, the Supreme Court held that the recommendations of the Human Rights Commission can be challenged in a Writ application.

Justice Sisira J. De Abrew with Justices Upaly Abeyrathne and Nalin Perera agreeing in his judgment upheld the appeal filed by Sri Lanka Telecom PLC.

Appellant Sri Lanka Telecom appealed to the Supreme Court challenging the judgment of the Court of Appeal.

The Court of Appeal in its judgment had held that an adverse recommendation issued by the Human Rights Commission (HRC) in terms of the HRC Act could not be challenged and could not be reviewed by the Court of Appeal in Writ proceedings for judicial review.

Appellant Sri Lanka Telecom cited the Human Rights Commission, its members, M.M.M. Zaheed and others as Respondents. Sanjeeva Jayawardena PC with Pubudini Wicremaratne appeared for Sri Lanka Telecom. Senior Deputy Solicitor General appeared for the HRC. W. Dayaratne PC appeared for Zaheed. 

The Supreme Court set aside the judgment of the Court of Appeal and upheld the argument of Sri Lanka Telecom that even a pure recommendation, as opposed to a final order or decision, the recommendation and report of HRC could be challenged in a Writ application as the law pertaining to Writ applications had evolved very greatly in the modern day and that even incidental orders which are not final orders and only recommendations of a tribunal could be challenged in a Writ application if they represent a step in a statutory process and held the potential of affecting the rights of a citizen.

The Supreme Court held that a recommendation made by the HRC generate an affectation of rights and interests and is therefore clearly justifiable and can be complained against in a Writ application.

The Supreme Court also held that whenever any body of persons having legal authority to determine questions affecting the rights of citizens, and whenever the legislature entrusts to anyone other than the superior courts, the power of imposing an obligation upon individuals, and which leads to an affectation of rights, the courts ought to exercise as widely as they can, the power of controlling those bodies if they attempted to make exceed their jurisdiction, even if that decision does not affect the rights immediately. This principle applies not merely to statutory bodies.

Accordingly the Supreme Court reversed the judgment of the Court of Appeal.


Share This Article

Facebook Twitter


DISCLAIMER:

1. All comments will be moderated by the Daily FT Web Editor.

2. Comments that are abusive, obscene, incendiary, defamatory or irrelevant will not be published.

3. We may remove hyperlinks within comments.

4. Kindly use a genuine email ID and provide your name.

5. Spamming the comments section under different user names may result in being blacklisted.

COMMENTS

Today's Columnists

The 1915 pogrom: Where were all the women?

Wednesday, 21 August 2019

The 1915 anti-Muslim pogrom in Sri Lanka (then Ceylon) is usually analysed through the lenses of ethnicity, religion, or class. Gender – and specifically women – appears to be absent in the narratives on this colonial-era conflict. Such absence i


The meaning of our slogans

Wednesday, 21 August 2019

Sri Lankans undoubtedly are inclined towards slogans, and the time of elections is the high season. They appear everywhere; on walls, bus stands, huge boulders, vehicles and even on the garments worn by the campaigners. Usually we are given somewhat


“Doing something” about social media?

Wednesday, 21 August 2019

Since the tragic terrorist incidents and pogroms of April and May, concerns about social media have been reverberating throughout our society. We are under pressure to “do something,” even without fully understanding the problems we seek to solve


Viewing PR as a marketing tool is missing the point!

Wednesday, 21 August 2019

When times are tough, businesses often cut the PR budget first – and small businesses may not have one at all. After all, PR is just one part of the marketing mix, right? Wrong! To view PR as just another marketing tool is to limit the scope of PR


Columnists More

Special Report

SPECIAL REPORT MORE