Home / Front Page/ Removal of PM: Experts warn President’s options limited by 19A

Removal of PM: Experts warn President’s options limited by 19A


Comments / {{hitsCtrl.values.hits}} Views / Wednesday, 14 February 2018 00:03


 

By Dharisha Bastians

The enactment of the historic 19th Amendment continues to have profound relevance on the options open to President Maithripala Sirisena as crisis deepens in the ruling coalition, with legal experts warning that a 2003 style take-over of ministries by the President or the unilateral sacking of the Prime Minister feared by many political observers is virtually impossible under the provisions of the Act. The incumbent President, who is subject to the provisions of the 19A, cannot force the removal of a sitting Prime Minister or the Cabinet of Ministers without triggering a major constitutional crisis, since the historic legislation has slashed presidential powers in this respect, legal experts told the Daily FT.

Since the passage of the 19th Amendment, the President no longer has the power to remove the Prime Minister at his discretion, said attorney at law and researcher at the Center for Policy Alternatives, Luwie Niranjan.

Under Article 46 (2) and 48 as amended by the 19th Amendment, the Cabinet of Ministers can only be dismissed if the Prime Minister ceases to hold office by death, resignation or otherwise, if Parliament rejects a statement of government policy or the Budget or if Parliament passes a vote of no confidence in the Government, Niranjan told Daily FT.

“The Prime Minister can only be dismissed if the premier resigns, the Cabinet of Ministers is dismissed or the PM ceases to be a Member of Parliament,” he explained further.

The President’s powers to dismiss individual Cabinet ministers is also restricted by the 19A, Niranjan said. “Under Article 46 (3) (a) the President is explicitly required to act on the advice of the Prime Minister on the removal of Cabinet ministers,” he added.

«Where the Constitution requires the President to act on the advice of the Prime Minister, the President cannot act without obtaining advice or act disregarding the advice given to him,» Niranjan told the Daily FT.


Share This Article


DISCLAIMER:

1. All comments will be moderated by the Daily FT Web Editor.

2. Comments that are abusive, obscene, incendiary, defamatory or irrelevant will not be published.

3. We may remove hyperlinks within comments.

4. Kindly use a genuine email ID and provide your name.

5. Spamming the comments section under different user names may result in being blacklisted.

COMMENTS

Today's Columnists

More of the same

Tuesday, 20 February 2018

Those of you who’ve read what I have written over the years could, justifiably, experience a sense of déjà vu as you read what follows. That said, I will make no apology for the burden of this piece because it will, again, state the eternal verit


Looking beyond the current political gridlock: Future of Tamil nationalist politics

Tuesday, 20 February 2018

The landslide victory of the Sri Lanka Podujana Peramuna (SLPP) in the recently concluded local government (LG) elections naturally attracted much attention to assessing the future trajectory of the domestic political landscape. The heavy focus on th


Liberal democracy is dead. Long live liberal democracy.

Tuesday, 20 February 2018

Liberal democracy as propounded and practiced by the UNP is dead. Beating up the statistics of the recent local election will not bring it back, but the UNP still remains the best vehicle for reviving liberal democratic ideals. Pohottuwa or the Sri L


Navigating a nuclearised Asia for smaller states: Reviving Sri Lanka’s commitments to disarmament

Tuesday, 20 February 2018

Throughout its diplomatic history, Sri Lanka has maintained a strong anti-nuclear stance. Given the perceived need to avoid antagonising nuclear powers in the region, Sri Lanka has communicated this stance as a general normative and ethical position,


Columnists More