Home / Front Page/ OPA differs with Malik on FTAs

OPA differs with Malik on FTAs

Comments / {{hitsCtrl.values.hits}} Views / Monday, 23 April 2018 00:24


The Organisation of Professional Associations (OPA) has refuted the recent assertions of Development Strategies and International Trade Minister Malik Samarawickrama on the benefits of Free Trade Agreements (FTAs) pursued by the Government. 

OPA, in a statement, said that having noted the contents of the press release by Minister Malik Samarawickrama (http://www.ft.lk/business/Malik-refutes-professionals-association-s-ETCA-concerns/34-652701) refuting the claims by the professionals that Free Trade Agreements (FTAs) signed by the Government had not been preceded by stakeholder consultations, it wished to state that:

1. There were no professional stakeholder consultations with specific time schedules, with proper consultation process and procedures except a few haphazardly convened meetings, without any progress review or acknowledgment of voluntary contribution by stakeholders. The government negotiating team comprising the Secretary and Officials of Ministry of Development Strategies and International Trade (MODSIT) and its advisors including the Attorney General, where they claimed to have been appointed by the Cabinet of Ministers, had no mechanism whatsoever for stakeholder consultations as prescribed by the Word Trade Organization (WTO). 

2. Until the professionals led by the OPA submitted a comprehensive 44-page report, titled ‘Way forward for Trade Liberalization’, detailing the domestic legal framework that should be in place before commencing negotiations with any country to liberalise trade in services, the ministerial team had no clue about the necessity of having a domestic regulatory framework. 

3. During the short period of consultations, the MODSIT team had no logistics for scheduling the meetings, recording the proceedings and taking follow-up action. Further, MODSIT had failed to date to produce a comprehensive set of minutes to all stakeholder professional groups. 

4. It should also be noted that the MODSIT had to date failed to submit at least a single draft legal document listed in the OPA report, which is a clear indication of technical incapability of the MODIST. It is sad to note that all professionals offered their inputs voluntarily, but the MODSIT had failed to use the invaluable voluntary contribution by the professionals. 

Given the above, the OPA categorically refutes the position considered by the Minister. 

OPA is the umbrella organisation for 48 professional associations in Sri Lanka that represent 33 professions and over 50,000 professionals in the country. 




Share This Article

Facebook Twitter


1. All comments will be moderated by the Daily FT Web Editor.

2. Comments that are abusive, obscene, incendiary, defamatory or irrelevant will not be published.

3. We may remove hyperlinks within comments.

4. Kindly use a genuine email ID and provide your name.

5. Spamming the comments section under different user names may result in being blacklisted.


Today's Columnists

We need to challenge climate change doubters before it is too late

Friday, 23 August 2019

Imagine a London where the entire subterranean region is engulfed with dirty water. Crammed train carriages that once barrelled along 249 miles of track transporting busy office workers, builders, teachers, civil servants, cleaners and students now r

The Provincial Council Elections – The charade goes on

Friday, 23 August 2019

Originally the SLPP was keen to hold the Provincial Council Elections (PCE) immediately after the Local Government Election results as they felt the PCE would go in their favour. PCE were held under the Proportional Representation system. The relevan

The presidency and the dilemma of the Presidential Election

Friday, 23 August 2019

J.R. Jayewardene created a presidential system not because the parliamentary system of governance that preceded it had failed. He wanted to take over all the powers of the State and assume the status of ancient kings who ruled the country in the past

Enough power in the presidency for the right person

Friday, 23 August 2019

The presidency has not much power some say, but I would say there is plenty for the right person. By intention or otherwise, our Constitution leaves the presidency to be defined by the person occupying the chair. Maithripala Sirisena (MS) showed us t

Columnists More

Special Report