Home / Front Page/ No unauthorised settlements in Wilpattu Forest Reserve: AG

No unauthorised settlements in Wilpattu Forest Reserve: AG


Comments / {{hitsCtrl.values.hits}} Views / Saturday, 10 February 2018 00:00


The Attorney General has asserted to the Court of Appeal today that the Wilpattu Forest Reserve has not been deforested and no unauthorised resettlement has been carried out.

The State counsel appealing for the Attorney General told the court that the people displaced by the war have been resettled in an area outside of the Wilpattu Forest Reserve and the resettled area was not a protected forest area.

The State Counsel made this statement when the petition filed by the Center for Environmental Justice (CEJ) in 2015 requesting the Court to issue an order for the removal of unauthorised structures in the Wilpattu Forest Reserve was taken for consideration before the Appellate Court on Thursday (8 February).

The State Counsel said that the Wilpattu Forest Reserve was located in the Puttalam district, but the resettlement was carried out in a forest area in the Mannar district.

He told the court that a special Presidential Task Force was set up for resettlement based on the instructions of then President Mahinda Rajapaksa on the recommendation of the Lessons Learnt and Reconciliation Commission (LLRC) during the past regime and the resettlement in Mannar district was carried out according to the recommendation made by the Task Force.

The State Counsel further stated that a few decades ago, the area where the alleged resettlement had taken place was inhabited and since the people left the area for a number of years ago, it has become a forest again.

The State attorney said the abandoned land areas had been identified and displaced people were settled in those lands, and if the court orders their removal from the resettled lands they will have to go back to the refugee camps.

However, the attorneys representing the petitioner informed the court that the Government in 2015 declared the area a conserved forest by a gazette a notification.

The State Counsel noted that, before 2015, the area had not been designated as a conserved forest area, and decades ago the area was inhabited by people.

Noting that this is a very complicated issue which requires a broad study, the Court of Appeal postponed the next hearing of the petition to 5 June.

Meanwhile, the Court of Appeal granted permission last week to hear a petition submitted by attorney Nagananda Kodituwakku requesting the court to order to remove the unauthorised settlements from the Wilpattu Forest Reserve and take the land back for the Government.

The petition cites Minister Rishad Bathiudeen, former Minister of Economic Development Basil Rajapaksa, Central Environmental Authority and Forest Department as respondents.

The Court ordered the respondents to appear in Court and present submissions on 5 March.


Share This Article


DISCLAIMER:

1. All comments will be moderated by the Daily FT Web Editor.

2. Comments that are abusive, obscene, incendiary, defamatory or irrelevant will not be published.

3. We may remove hyperlinks within comments.

4. Kindly use a genuine email ID and provide your name.

5. Spamming the comments section under different user names may result in being blacklisted.

COMMENTS

Today's Columnists

Ranil’s tactical success, Mahinda’s strategic victory

Wednesday, 21 February 2018

Who will defeat the UNP? The people, with or without the Sri Lanka Freedom Party. That was proved at the local government


Betraying the very foundation of the Unity Government- Consensus

Wednesday, 21 February 2018

Soon after the results of the Local Government bodies were released, it was reported that the President wanted the resignation of the Prime Minister


Sri Lankan consumer under pressure

Wednesday, 21 February 2018

Whilst Sri Lanka is grappling to understand how to structure the Government to run the country, the reality is thWhilst Sri Lanka


More of the same

Tuesday, 20 February 2018

Those of you who’ve read what I have written over the years could, justifiably, experience a sense of déjà vu as you read what follows. That said, I will make no apology for the burden of this piece because it will, again, state the eternal verit


Columnists More