Home / Front Page/ Local Authorities Elections Bill disputed

Local Authorities Elections Bill disputed


Comments / {{hitsCtrl.values.hits}} Views / Saturday, 9 September 2017 00:00




By S.S. Selvanayagam

The Supreme Court yesterday fixed for hearing on Monday the petition on the Local Authorities Elections (Amendment) Act, which has already been passed by Parliament and had been awaiting approval by the Speaker.

The bench comprised Chief Justice Priyasath Dep and Justices Anil Gooneratne and Vijith K. Malalgoda.

Former member of Kaduwela Municipal Council G. A. Neel Shantha on 30 August filed his petition citing the Attorney General, Election Commission Chairman Mahinda Deshapriya, members of the Election Commission, the Minister of Provincial Councils and Local Government Faiszer Musthapha as Respondents. Dharshana Weraduwage appeared for the Petitioner.

Petitioner states the Local Authorities Elections (Amendment) Act during the third reading had new amendments introduced to the Original Bill, which were not included in the bill published in the Gazette, which deprived the Petitioner and many other classes of Public Servants including “Samurdhi Officers, Development Officers, Grama Seva Niladharis” from contesting to the next election by introducing disabilities to their being eligible to contest in the said election, which also have a retrospective effect.

He states the passing of the said new Amendments is contrary to the established legislative process and is an infringement of Articles 78, 121 read with 124 of the Constitution as well as Articles 3 read with 4(d), 12(1), 12(2) and 14(1)(g) of the Constitution.

He claims said amendments have been introduced without the sanction of the Attorney General in terms of 77 of the Constitution.

He alleged the said amendments have been introduced without the sanction of the Cabinet of Ministers and contrary to the due process established in submitting Cabinet memoranda which requires the mandatory approval of the Cabinet of Ministers.

He contends the fifth Respondent Minister of Provincial Councils and Local Government has no power to introduce the said new Amendments as aforesaid.

He maintains that the said new Amendments which were introduced contrary to the established legislative process is an infringement of the Standing Orders of Parliament.

He is seeking the Court to issue stay order against the Election Commission from taking any steps to call nominations for elections till the final determination of his application.


Share This Article


DISCLAIMER:

1. All comments will be moderated by the Daily FT Web Editor.

2. Comments that are abusive, obscene, incendiary, defamatory or irrelevant will not be published.

3. We may remove hyperlinks within comments.

4. Kindly use a genuine email ID and provide your name.

5. Spamming the comments section under different user names may result in being blacklisted.

COMMENTS

Today's Columnists

A brief guide to the legal system of China

Thursday, 21 June 2018

The law of the People’s Republic of China (PRC) is officially referred to as the “socialist legal system with Chinese characteristics”. The formation and development of the socialist legal system with Chinese characteristics are compatible with


The evolution of CSR towards Creating Integrated Value

Thursday, 21 June 2018

Creating Integrated Value (CIV), a term that I coined in 2014, is a concept and practice that has emerged from a long tradition of exploring the role of business in society. It has roots in what many today call corporate (social) responsibility or CS


Let’s educate ourselves for change!

Thursday, 21 June 2018

Ordinary Level Examinations are over. Results are in. What should I be doing at Advanced Level? Science, Commerce or Arts? And what subject combinations? This always is a burning question for some and also for parents. This question is usually answe


Dudley Senanayake, the principled leader who was never power hungry

Thursday, 21 June 2018

Though I have seen Dudley Senanayake speaking in meetings, my first face-to-face meeting with him took place in 1970. Given that it was immediately after United National Party’s crushing defeat at the general election, he was in a very sombre mood.


Columnists More