Home / Front Page/ JVP questions free visa on arrival facility for tourists

JVP questions free visa on arrival facility for tourists


Comments / {{hitsCtrl.values.hits}} Views / Saturday, 6 April 2019 00:05

Facebook

  • Voices concern about increased reports of foreigners in illegal activities 
  • Warns state would lose millions by granting free visas
  • Questions if evaluation carried out before putting new rule in place

 

The JVP lawmaker on Thursday questioned the Government decision to grant free visas valid for up to six months to tourists from select countries amidst reports of an increase indrug trafficking, bio-piracy, and financial frauds along with other criminal activities by foreign nationals.

The Government announced recently that the free visa facility will apply to nationals of Thailand, the UK, Australia, South Korea, Canada, the US, Singapore, Malaysia, New Zealand and EU passport holders. The move is aimed at increasing tourist arrivals in the country. 

Janatha Vimukthi Peramuna (JVP) MP Bimal Rathnayake taking part in the Committee Stage Program of Budget 2019 demanded an explanation from the Government on what grounds it has decided to commence issuing the six months free visa. The new system will become effective from this month. 

“A tourist has to pay $ 30 to obtain a visit visa to Sri Lanka. The decision to issue free visas to selected countries will lead to the loss of millions of foreign currency. I wonder why these tourists are unable to pay $30 to obtain a visa to enter Sri Lanka. It is questionable what these tourists are willing to spend here in Sri Lanka after entering with free visa,” he said. The JVP lawmakers questioned if the Government has any plan to recover the loss incurred from issuing the free visa. “Did the Government carry out an evaluation to measure the income we can gain after this decision? Otherwise, we will lose the income we gain at the moment from tourism,” he added. (AH) 


Share This Article

Facebook Twitter


DISCLAIMER:

1. All comments will be moderated by the Daily FT Web Editor.

2. Comments that are abusive, obscene, incendiary, defamatory or irrelevant will not be published.

3. We may remove hyperlinks within comments.

4. Kindly use a genuine email ID and provide your name.

5. Spamming the comments section under different user names may result in being blacklisted.

COMMENTS

Today's Columnists

A case for reviewing plantation management

Thursday, 23 May 2019

Last week, I elaborated on ‘Going Beyond Agronomic Research for Plantation Reform’ with the aim of beginning a conversation on the importance of non-agronomic research to understand the many problematic areas that plague the plantation sector, in


How are we doing in e-government?

Thursday, 23 May 2019

It is customary to assess some aspect of the performance of a country using a composite index such as the Ease of Doing Business Index or the Network Readiness Index. For government services, there is the e-Government Development Index (EGDI), issued


National introspection in the aftermath

Thursday, 23 May 2019

“The immediate task for the Government is to guaranty the safety and security of all innocent Muslims and prevent a recurrence of 1983 … One cannot eradicate one evil with another” – Anatomy of an Islamist Infamy (III), CT, 9 May. In this, th


AI + BI + CI x DI = Empowering, enriching and impacting society and environmental wellbeing

Thursday, 23 May 2019

There has never been a time like today where many are raising concerns for society’s wellbeing, survival and thriving, despite many progressive advancements in the digitally transformed world. We are already in the so-called Fourth Industrial Revo


Columnists More