Home / Columnists/ Communication challenges

Communication challenges

Comments / {{hitsCtrl.values.hits}} Views / Monday, 17 March 2014 00:00


We looked at the what, why and how of communication in relation to managers last week. In moving further, let’s look at some key challenges of communication. They are being discussed in many a forum local and global alike. The attempt here is to relate, reflect and reinforce the realms of communication. Overview The way we understood last week, communication comes from the Latin root ‘communis,’ meaning to share. It is to keep information in common. Therefore, communication, in brief, is information exchange. It even goes beyond. It is the activity of conveying information through the exchange of thoughts, messages, or information, as by speech, visuals, signals, writing, or behaviour. We identified four key facets of communication. They are simply, speaking, listening, reading and writing Effective verbal communication involves the use of both speech and writing to transmit a message. While oral communication is more effective in reaching a focused target audience, as it involves interaction and additional non-verbal cues to augment the speech, written communication is necessary for reaching a large number of scattered recipients. Depending on the situation and the requirements, organisations use both the spoken as well as written channels for communication. "Managers should commit themselves to becoming better communicators. It needs enhancing capabilities and understanding cultures so that all forms of communication can effectively take place. Sri Lankan managers need to make considerable progress in dealing with their stakeholders. In doing so in a committed manner, they will act as contributors to individual, institutional and industrial success" Let’s look at the communication challenges associated with writing, speaking, reading and listing in using seven Cs. They are the challenges being correct, courteous, considerate, complete, concise, coherent and clear. Correctness Challenge In writing, the message should be grammatically correct. The ability to write grammatically correct sentences is assumed in the corporate and administrative world. Grammatical errors create a very bad impression of the writer and they can be very distracting and annoying to the reader. The concept of correctness extends beyond grammatical correctness. Not only should grammar and spelling be correct, but content must also correct. A mechanically correct letter that contains the wrong date for an important meeting, specifies the wrong size or quantity for an order, or quotes an incorrect price is seriously flawed. This applies to reading in grasping the accurate message. It also applies to speaking in conveying the accurate message. With regard to listening, getting the write message from the speaker is the challenge. Sri Lankan managers can be conscious of the correctness in order to avoid any confusion when they communicate. Courteousness Challenge Professional writing should always be courteous. So is the speaking in many occasions. Also for listening, it is important to show courtesy to the speaker, whenever possible. According to age-old wisdom, good manners are a part of good business. Please and thank you are important elements of business writing, whether they are expressly stated or only implied. Just for comparison, consider the following pair of statements. We have received your order for five reams of letterhead stationery. Thank you for your order of five reams of letterhead stationery. Obviously, the second one is more courteous. What matters first is the mindset. Consideration Challenge Courteous and considerate are related ideas, but they are not identical. Courteous refers more to word choice, to saying please and thank you. Considerate refers more to a general attitude, what is usually referred to in business writing as the ‘you-attitude’. In order words the effective professional communicator always tries to think in terms of the receiver and to see situation from the receiver’s viewpoint. The considerate communicator is tactful and does not alienate the receiver. Instead of saying, “you didn’t send your cheque,” it is far more considerate to say, “we have not received your cheque yet.” The consideration challenge involves focus on more the recipient than the initiator. Sri Lankan managers can strengthen the aspect of consideration by developing more empathy. It is the capacity to understand the other person. It is a matter of getting into ‘other’s shoes’ and seeing the world from the other’s point of view. Many disputes ranging from individual clashes to industrial disputes can be a result of not having empathy. There are two sides to a coin, and one should avoid one-sided decisions. Completeness Challenge “A good speech should be like a woman’s skirt: long enough to cover the subject and short enough to create interest,” said Winston Churchill. A message is complete when it contains all the information that it should contain. Just what that information is, of course will depend on the nature of the message. For example, organisations frequently are unable to fulfil a sender’s request for information or products because the sender failed to include a return address, No matter how well written these requests are, they are incomplete and unsuccessful. The announcement that fails to include the location or time, the order that fails to show colour or size, the phone message that omits the area code-all are incomplete and ineffective. To be effective, a message must be complete. It must contain everything the particular situation requires. It reminds me of what Rudyard Kipling said a long time ago: I keep six honest serving-men (They taught me all I knew); Their names are What and Why and When And How and Where and Who. For a message to be complete, managers should pay adequate attention to these five Ws and one H. Instead of saying, “the time for next week’s board meeting has been changed to 3:15p.m,” it is far more complete to say, “the board meeting has been rescheduled for Tuesday, 5 May, at 3:15 p.m. in Room 4, because of the Chairman’s overseas visit.” Conciseness Challenge “I didn’t have time to write a short letter, so I wrote a long one instead,” said Mark Twain. Conciseness does not necessarily mean brevity, but effective with optimum use of words. When we say that a message is concise, we mean that it is no longer than it needs to be to achieve its purpose. A 30-page report is concise if it needs to be 30 pages to achieve its purpose effectively. A nine-word sentence is not concise if the same information could have been stated in six words. I see a huge challenge for us here. Some of us enjoy elaborating with eloquence. Is it what the recipients really require? A concise message achieves its purpose without sacrificing clarity, completeness, courtesy and consideration. The good communicator simply eliminates unnecessary words. Instead of saying, “I am in agreement with you regarding the proposal,” one may say, “I agree with your proposal.” We can easily find lifeless wordy expressions in business correspondence. “A cheque in the amount of” can be simplified as “a cheque for”. “In view of fact that” is as same as “because”. Instead of “will you be kind enough to”, we can say “please”. Coherence Challenge In a well-communicated professional message, everything should “hang together”. The message is unified and well organised. Information that doesn’t belong in the message is left out; information that does belong is included. The ideas are connected and follow logically from one another. This is applicable to all forms of communication. Let’s zoom into writing for deeper details. “Your qualifications are excellent. Your qualifications do not meet our requirements. We are unable to offer you a position.” The same idea can be coherently expressed as “we regret our inability to offer you a job despite your excellent qualifications”. Irrelevant information is best omitted entirely. Where appropriate, it can be replaced by something more relevant. “Ms. Perera and Ms. Fernando met for lunch to discuss the contract, to review the proposal, and the dessert was delicious.” Obviously, you do not need the latter part. Clarity Challenge “In the land of gibberish, the man who makes sense, the man who speaks clearly, clearly speaks nonsense,” said Jarod Kintz, in his work, ‘This Book Has No Title’. I see a considerable relevance of this to Sri Lankan managers. Are we clear enough? Effective professional messages should be clear, readable, and understandable. Clarity in writing is achieved through wise word choice, good sentence and paragraph construction, and the overall organisation of the massage. The same applies to other form of communication. I remember a few years ago, a letter was sent to a group of prospective postgraduate students to bring a letter in quadruplicate. The intention was to have four copies for the interview panellists. Most of them had brought only one, presumably not understanding what quadruplicate means. In writing, vague pronoun references and dangling modifiers contribute to lack of clarity. So do unfamiliar words, vague words, poorly constructed sentences that fail to emphasise what is important, and paragraphs that are poorly focused and lacking in unity. From seven Cs to one C The seven communication challenges discussed above can be overcome with one solid C, which for me is commitment. “It usually takes me more than three weeks to prepare a good impromptu speech,” said Mark Twain. Managers should commit themselves to becoming better communicators. It needs enhancing capabilities and understanding cultures so that all forms of communication can effectively take place. Sri Lankan managers need to make considerable progress in dealing with their stakeholders. In doing so in a committed manner, they will act as contributors to individual, institutional and industrial success. (Dr. Ajantha Dharmasiri works at the Postgraduate Institute of Management. He can be reached on ajantha@pim.lk or www.ajanthadharmasiri.info.)

Share This Article

Facebook Twitter


1. All comments will be moderated by the Daily FT Web Editor.

2. Comments that are abusive, obscene, incendiary, defamatory or irrelevant will not be published.

3. We may remove hyperlinks within comments.

4. Kindly use a genuine email ID and provide your name.

5. Spamming the comments section under different user names may result in being blacklisted.


Today's Columnists

Our Cricket Board simply cannot deliver – why not they all quit honourably?

Tuesday, 18 June 2019

“It is necessary, therefore, for the Government to pay serious attention to the doings of Sri Lanka Cricket [board] and take immediate action to lift their game for the progress of our glorious game.” Question for Sri Lanka Cricket (board) Sri La

Yesterday Tamils, today Muslims and tomorrow who?

Tuesday, 18 June 2019

From the time of S.W.R.D. Bandaranaike’s election victory in 1956, one and only one issue had dominated political party campaigns in this country; and that was communalism. The Tamil community was the main focus of these campaigns for over 50 years

Those who go by social proof are easy prey to crafty schemers

Monday, 17 June 2019

Going after social proof Swiss writer and novelist, Rolf Dobelli, in one of the essays in his 2013 book ‘The Art of Thinking Clearly’, has given a fine warning to his readers. He has warned against going by ‘social proof’ or ‘majority view

Poson ponderings on positional power: ‘Authority vested’ vs. ‘authority wasted’

Monday, 17 June 2019

We witnessed a serene Poson Poya, in a far more improved security setting in Sri Lanka. Whilst the Sri Lankan life slowly returning to normal, political fronts do not appear to show the same. Has the political power become the people ‘pava’ (sin)

Columnists More