Home / Columnists/ Is the law a source of control?

Is the law a source of control?


Comments / {{hitsCtrl.values.hits}} Views / Tuesday, 28 November 2017 00:00


In Australia we recently had a plebiscite to inquire the opinion of the masses relating same sex marriages. While the vote and the period leading up to it was divisive, more than 60% of the count supported an amendment to the existing laws of marriage to incorporate same sex unions. Yet, my whole issue with this is if this plebiscite was necessary.

The state always reserves the right to pass laws to the bereft of the community it serves. Thereby, irrespective of the personal notions and beliefs its representatives hold, the government is obliged to facilitate the cultural revolutions honoured and accepted within its electorate. These could include the legalisation of marijuana; same sex marriage and God knows what else, since the law is a representation of society not its incarceration thereof. 

And when the state deems that the proposed changes could inflict or infringe the rights of another (such as the religious rights of the SSM opposes and the safety of drivers sharing the roads with those who are “pun intended” high), it should incorporate certain protections. This I believe is the principle of a republic, wherein the state adheres to the wishes of the masses while protecting those of the minority.

Similarly, when a religious state enforces laws in its homeland, which could seem to be mutilating the western liberal dogma embraced by most thriving economies, we cannot question their legitimacy nor their intent. For as I state earlier, the law is a representation of society. 

On the contrary, when the state enacts legislation to the opposing view of the masses, we ought to question and resist them, as that is the beginning of anarchy!

(The writer is an FX trader and poker enthusiast.)


Share This Article


DISCLAIMER:

1. All comments will be moderated by the Daily FT Web Editor.

2. Comments that are abusive, obscene, incendiary, defamatory or irrelevant will not be published.

3. We may remove hyperlinks within comments.

4. Kindly use a genuine email ID and provide your name.

5. Spamming the comments section under different user names may result in being blacklisted.

COMMENTS

Today's Columnists

Things to do in a Democracy when you’re dead…

Tuesday, 18 December 2018

In yesterday’s column, I argued a case for not impeaching the chief executive of the coup that has left our country situation in ruins. At the end of a pitched battle between the forces of unconstitutional ambition on one hand and democratic resist


Tweaking the New Inland Revenue Act (Part II)

Tuesday, 18 December 2018

In the backdrop where the recent amendment to the country’s supreme law is called in question, it may be appropriate to recall that the passage of the new Inland Revenue (IR) Act through Parliament was far more controversial. Nevertheless, the new


Advancing gender parity in Sri Lanka

Tuesday, 18 December 2018

Asia-Pacific today is a true engine of growth in the world—a region that has barely tapped its potential to develop, invest, and innovate. But as the region speeds ahead, the dynamics of its workforce, one that was predominantly male in the past, i


What’s next after the Supreme Court decision?

Tuesday, 18 December 2018

Last Thursday, just before the courts closed for Christmas holidays, the Supreme Court, sticking strictly to a legalistic path, put an end to the controversial issue of defining the powers of President Maithripala Sirisena, leaving the nation to wres


Columnists More