Gota’s citizenship, US silence and presidency

Friday, 15 November 2019 00:00 -     - {{hitsCtrl.values.hits}}

Gotabaya Rajapaksa 

As soon as Gota’s dual citizenship became a debatable issue on the eve of his nomination by his brother’s party, the SLPP, US authorities must have realised that they have been presented with manna from heaven to help them achieve what they want from Sri Lanka, irrespective of who wins the tight contest. In a single stroke of her pen, the US Ambassador in Colombo could have cleared the air immediately, but she must have been advised to allow the controversy continue, perhaps until the election is over. The Election Commissioner also, either through deliberate or innocent neglect, did not bother to check Gota’s credentials. Was he in cahoots with the Ambassador? 

Generally speaking, in any event or issue that dominates politics outside its own territory, what immediately matters to any country and its government is its own national interest; and in the case of the US, its imperial interest. This is the stark reality of international relations. US meddling in Sri Lankan politics has a long history which dates back to 1950s, but its intensity increased no sooner than China’s influence in the Indian Ocean in general and Sri Lanka in particular started deepening. The island’s geo-strategic position in the Indian Ocean is too precious to be ignored by any regional or imperial power. More than 80% of oceanic trade is currently carried out through the Indian Ocean, from the Straits of Hormuz through Bab el-Mandab Strait and Strait of Malacca. Sri Lanka is at the crossroads of this trade artery. One cannot therefore underestimate the crucial importance of Sri Lanka’s harbours and sea lanes. 

By gaining a 99-year leasehold over Sri Lanka’s Hambantota Harbour and through funding the infrastructure development of the country quite generously, China outbid all her rivals and brought the realisation of her One Belt One Road (OBOR) strategy ever closer. Now the Americans want to checkmate China by gaining at least an equal footing in Sri Lanka. The controversial Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA), Acquisition and Cross-Servicing Agreement (ACSA) and the Millennium Challenge Corporation (MCC) are all means through which such footing could be achieved. The question is who or which government in Sri Lanka will sign these agreements and entrap the country in the imperial net.            

There is already a number of voices supporting the signing of these agreements within the present Government, and if Sajith becomes the President and his UNP captures the Government in the next General Election, the US will feel more comfortable and confident in achieving those objectives. However, it may be problematic under a Gota Presidency with a pro-Chinese Rajapaksa Government. This is where Gota’s citizenship issue and the court cases filed against him in California can be used as trump cards by the US. Whether Gota will be allowed to remain President or dethroned would depend on his response to US requests. This is why the US is now silent.   

Landmark Saturday 

The Presidential Election on Saturday will be a landmark event. Reduced to a straight contest between two men, Gota and Sajith, with another, Anura Kumara Dissanayake, running third, the presidential race is going to determine not only the direction of Sri Lanka’s economic and foreign policies but also the future of the country’s democracy and ethnic pluralism. It is a contest between one who promises a technocratic cabinet ruled by an iron fist, and another that promises a cabinet of ministers with honesty and integrity who will protect the country’s pluralism and its framework of participatory democracy. There is broad suspicion that the technocracy and iron fist may translate into a family oligarchy and plutocracy. Would it also mean the end of democracy in Sri Lanka?

Both candidates have no clarity in their respective economic strategies to promote growth with equity, or about measures and techniques to improve the welfare of the ordinary masses. Only Anura has promised to narrow the wealth gap. However, given the constraints of a ballooning budget deficit, trade deficit and national debt, one is not sure whether Gota or Sajith will be able to honour their lavish promises given to the gullible during the campaign. The only one who seems to have a credible alternative path, Anura, may have to work harder to sell his program before the forthcoming General Election.

Above all, how the leading two candidates are going to rein in the recklessness of ultranationalist Buddhist supremacists and their lawlessness against minorities is not clear. There is a threat of violence and bloodshed against Muslims after the election, and there appears to be a sinister plan drawn up by these supremacists to narrow the open economy space for the role of minorities in economic and commercial ventures. Having hijacked the public administration already and reduced the weight of minorities to just 8%, these supremacists are aiming to achieve the same in the economic sector. This is a self-defeating strategy.      

There is a fundamental truth about an economy which is taken for granted by most economists and policy-makers. Economic growth and prosperity cannot be achieved and sustained without the active participation of the entire nation. There is no point talking about national product and national income when part of the nation feels left out of the growth game. In a pluralist society like Sri Lanka, this entails the participation of its every component. That participation will not be forthcoming unless there is peace and tranquillity in the country. 

People are the most precious asset in any society. Of what use is foreign capital and high-tech led economic growth if sections of local society are kept out of and do not benefit from it? Gross National Happiness (GNH) is ‘sine qua non’ for Gross National Product (GNP), and GNP in turn enhances GNH. Ultranationalists hinder both, which is why they are the real enemies of Sri Lanka.  Which President will control them?  

COMMENTS