Home / Front Page/ SC holds that HRC recommendations can be challenged in Writ application

SC holds that HRC recommendations can be challenged in Writ application

Comments / {{hitsCtrl.values.hits}} Views / Tuesday, 11 July 2017 00:22


By S.S. Selvanayagam

In a landmark judgment, the Supreme Court held that the recommendations of the Human Rights Commission can be challenged in a Writ application.

Justice Sisira J. De Abrew with Justices Upaly Abeyrathne and Nalin Perera agreeing in his judgment upheld the appeal filed by Sri Lanka Telecom PLC.

Appellant Sri Lanka Telecom appealed to the Supreme Court challenging the judgment of the Court of Appeal.

The Court of Appeal in its judgment had held that an adverse recommendation issued by the Human Rights Commission (HRC) in terms of the HRC Act could not be challenged and could not be reviewed by the Court of Appeal in Writ proceedings for judicial review.

Appellant Sri Lanka Telecom cited the Human Rights Commission, its members, M.M.M. Zaheed and others as Respondents. Sanjeeva Jayawardena PC with Pubudini Wicremaratne appeared for Sri Lanka Telecom. Senior Deputy Solicitor General appeared for the HRC. W. Dayaratne PC appeared for Zaheed. 

The Supreme Court set aside the judgment of the Court of Appeal and upheld the argument of Sri Lanka Telecom that even a pure recommendation, as opposed to a final order or decision, the recommendation and report of HRC could be challenged in a Writ application as the law pertaining to Writ applications had evolved very greatly in the modern day and that even incidental orders which are not final orders and only recommendations of a tribunal could be challenged in a Writ application if they represent a step in a statutory process and held the potential of affecting the rights of a citizen.

The Supreme Court held that a recommendation made by the HRC generate an affectation of rights and interests and is therefore clearly justifiable and can be complained against in a Writ application.

The Supreme Court also held that whenever any body of persons having legal authority to determine questions affecting the rights of citizens, and whenever the legislature entrusts to anyone other than the superior courts, the power of imposing an obligation upon individuals, and which leads to an affectation of rights, the courts ought to exercise as widely as they can, the power of controlling those bodies if they attempted to make exceed their jurisdiction, even if that decision does not affect the rights immediately. This principle applies not merely to statutory bodies.

Accordingly the Supreme Court reversed the judgment of the Court of Appeal.

Share This Article

Facebook Twitter


1. All comments will be moderated by the Daily FT Web Editor.

2. Comments that are abusive, obscene, incendiary, defamatory or irrelevant will not be published.

3. We may remove hyperlinks within comments.

4. Kindly use a genuine email ID and provide your name.

5. Spamming the comments section under different user names may result in being blacklisted.


Today's Columnists

Difference between a woman and a man (yin and yang) and finding solutions to violence in society

Thursday, 18 July 2019

This is not at all a philosophical discourse on gender differences, or the complementary roles of yin and yang (women and men) in social or biological formation. This is also not to speak about who is superior among the two. This is just an observati

I wish Sajith Premadasa had taken up a challenging ministry to showcase his prowess

Thursday, 18 July 2019

Expectations, father and son Sajith Premadasa has put his hands up for leadership in the party and for nomination by the United National Party in the forthcoming presidential elections. I wish Sajith had tested himself, and had given the public a cha

Foreign Affairs and Defence to be one portfolio?

Thursday, 18 July 2019

Unless we are all suffering from dementia, the last experience with a foreign military on our soil should be very clear in our heads. The Indian Peace Keeping Force landed in Sri Lanka to supposedly bring peace to the war-torn country when the LTTE t

Federer lessons for Sri Lanka tourism

Thursday, 18 July 2019

The Wimbledon Men’s Final in 2008 was termed as the best match the world has seen between the two arch rivals Federer and Nadal. But, what we saw last Sunday between the two of them after 11 years sure shocked the world. Many just asked the questio

Columnists More