Home / News/ SC stays CA judgment on Geetha Kumarasinghe

SC stays CA judgment on Geetha Kumarasinghe


Comments / {{hitsCtrl.values.hits}} Views / Saturday, 13 May 2017 00:21


By S.S. Selvanayagam

The Supreme Court yesterday (12) issued an Interim Order staying till Monday (15) the operation of the Court of Appeal order disqualifying Galle District UPFA Parliamentarian Geetha Kumarasinghe as a Member of Parliament.

The bench comprising Justices B.P. geetha-kumarasinghe-copyAluvihara, Priyantha Jayawardane and Anil Gooneratne fixed for support on Monday (15) her appeal against the Court of Appeal judgment on her dual citizenship.

Kumarasinghe last Tuesday (9) filed an appeal in the Supreme Court against the judgment of the Court of Appeal repealing her seat in Parliament over her dual citizenship.

 J.C. Welamuna, appearing for petitioner-respondents W.W.E. Buweneka, J.K. Amarawardhana, A.C.Gunasekera, J.K.Wijesinghe and Prasanna Deepthilal yesterday opposed the appeal being supported, claiming that they had not received notice and papers.

Romesh de Silva PC with Sugath Caldera appeared for the respondent-appellant Geetha Kumarasinghe. Santhaka Jayasundera appeared for respondent-respondent UPFA Secretary Prof. Vishwa Warnapala. Deputy Solicitor General Janak de Silva appeared for respondent-respondents the Controller of Immigration and Emigration, the Secretary General of Parliament and the Attorney General.

The Court of Appeal on 5 May ruled that she was not entitled to be a Member of Parliament as she had contested the election while being a dual citizen.

Justice Preethi Padman Surasena, with Justice Vijith Malalgoda (CA President ) agreeing, also directed the State to recover the cost from her as the debt to the State for the each day she sat in Parliament knowing that she was a dual citizen and disqualified from being a Member of Parliament.

 The Attorney General informed the Court of Appeal that Kumarasinghe MP was still a citizen of Switzerland and according to the 19th Amendment to the Constitution a person who has dual citizenship cannot be a Member of Parliament.

Deputy Solicitor General Janak De Silva had also informed the Court of Appeal that, according to clause 91(1) of the Constitution, she was not entitled to parliamentary privileges and could not be a Member of Parliament.

 The Appeal Court ruled that Kumarasinghe could no longer function as a Parliamentarian as she had contested the general election while possessing dual citizenship.

 A former actress-turned politician Kumarasinghe holds dual citizenship in Sri Lanka and Switzerland.

 Under the Constitution of Sri Lanka, no person can be elected to Parliament if they hold dual citizenship.  Five voters of the Galle district had filed the writ petition in the Court of Appeal requesting court to declare Kumarasinghe ineligible to remain a Parliamentarian while holding dual citizenship.

The Court held that under the 19th Amendment to the Constitution, a dual citizen was not eligible to contest for parliamentary membership and therefore Kumarasinghe could no longer function as a parliamentarian. The petitioners in their writ application challenged her appointment and election as a parliamentarian based on her dual citizenship. The petitioners sought the Court of Appeal to issue a prerogative Writ Order requiring her to show by what authority she  claims to hold office as a Member of Parliament and an another order declaring that she is disqualified from being a Member of Parliament and thus not entitled to hold office.

 


Share This Article


COMMENTS

Today's Columnists

Is Sri Lanka ready for the 2025 growth agenda?

Tuesday, 19 September 2017

The other day the President and Prime Minister launched the 2025 vision for Sri Lanka which was incidentally the third policy statement of the Government since coming to power in 2015. My view is that the continuous changes to policy is important and


Venerable villainy of mercenary monks

Tuesday, 19 September 2017

The picture says it all. The ‘Silredi Sirakaruwan Mudaganime Aramudala’ was not demonstration of piety. It was a bold repudiation of the rule of law by a cabal of venerable villains, brazenly insisting that we Sinhala Buddhists submit to a rule b


Government has accepted jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice over Sri Lanka

Tuesday, 19 September 2017

At the ongoing September 2017 sessions of the UN Human Rights Council, the UK has written to the President of the Council to assert that a long standing dispute it has with the Mauritius cannot be referred to the International Court of Justice becaus


Vision 2025: Part 1: Need for moving from a wish list to a concrete plan

Monday, 18 September 2017

The Unity Government released its newest economic policy statement titled V2025 – the marketing tag for the goals it has set for realisation from 2017 to 2025 – two weeks ago.


Columnists More