Home / Front Page/ RTI invoked to expose Army support to remanded suspects and spying on public officers

RTI invoked to expose Army support to remanded suspects and spying on public officers

Comments / {{hitsCtrl.values.hits}} Views / Monday, 27 February 2017 00:30


A wide-ranging Right to Information Act request was filed with the Army on Saturday, requesting details of how state resources have been used to aid soldiers and officers accused of attacks on media personnel and to confirm or deny whether the army has spied on the police and public officers investigating those attacks.

The request, filed by Sunday Leader journalist Nirmala Kannangara, covers “legal, financial and personal assistance” including “advice, money and material resources” with a special focus on the practice of retaining private lawyers to appear for suspects and paying for their fees with public funds. 

The request also seeks information on any army involvement in physical or electronic surveillance of “police officers, prosecutors, magistrates or other public functionaries involved in investigating, prosecuting, or ruling” on the criminal investigations into the murder of Lasantha Wickrematunge, the disappearance of Prageeth Eknaligoda, the assault on Upali Tennekoon and the abduction and assault of Keith Noyahr.

The purpose of the request, it reads, is to discover “whether funds of the state, or other material resources or state services including in particular the services of serving military personnel have been mobilised for the purpose of defending, protecting, supporting or advancing the interests of military personnel who are alleged, suspected or accused of having committed serious criminal offences which in no way could be attributed to protecting national security or countering terrorism.”

According to the RTI Act, the army would have 14 days to respond to the request with a decision to either provide the requested information or reject it, and then a further 14 days to provide the information if the request is approved.

While no legal basis exists for any state entity to spend public funds or utilise Government resources to defend public servants facing criminal charges, several reports have suggested that the army may have made exception for military intelligence officers facing criminal charges for the murder, disappearance, assault and abduction of journalists.

Share This Article

Facebook Twitter


1. All comments will be moderated by the Daily FT Web Editor.

2. Comments that are abusive, obscene, incendiary, defamatory or irrelevant will not be published.

3. We may remove hyperlinks within comments.

4. Kindly use a genuine email ID and provide your name.

5. Spamming the comments section under different user names may result in being blacklisted.


Today's Columnists

Private or State hospitals? State, of course!

Wednesday, 18 September 2019

Framing the debate For those of us who can afford them, the question is often raised whether we should go to the neighbourhood private hospital or State hospital when sick. The purpose of this article is to share my experience over my lifetime in alw

Teaming up with the CIO for a journey towards transformational ERP

Wednesday, 18 September 2019

An ERP (Enterprise Resource Planning) implementation with a focus on a business outcome can bring significant competitive advantage across every area of the business. Earlier, it was the CIO who had to figure out the design and implementation of the

CRIB – Individual Credit Score

Wednesday, 18 September 2019

With the recent announcement of releasing credit scores of banked citizens commences a new chapter of the country’s lending industry. The General Manager of the Credit Information Bureau (CRIB) Nandi Anthony stated that the Bureau plans to release

Doomsday experts and entrepreneurial policymaking

Tuesday, 17 September 2019

Views of two economic experts caught my eye last week. While one has given a scathing criticism of the Government for its handling of the economy, the other has given an analysis of the so-called “debt problem” of Sri Lanka. Doomsday scenario by

Columnists More