Home / News/ SC postpones Namal Rajapaksa contempt proceedings for 16 Jan.

SC postpones Namal Rajapaksa contempt proceedings for 16 Jan.

Comments / {{hitsCtrl.values.hits}} Views / Thursday, 1 December 2016 00:03


By S.S. Selvanayagam

The Supreme Court yesterday postponed the contempt proceedings against Hambantota District Parliamentarian Namal Rajapaksa for 16 January.

The bench, comprising Chief Justice K. Sripavan and Justice Buwaneka Aluvihara, postponed the matter because Justice Priyasath Dep was not present.

The Supreme Court on 15 September directed the Bribery Commission to file charges against Rajapaksa on or before 3 October for the alleged offence of contempt of the Bribery Commission. Court rejected the preliminary objections raised by Rajapaksa.

The Bribery Commission filed charges against Rajapaksa in the Supreme Court for allegedly disrespecting the commission’s authority by failing to appear before it on 26 May.

Then Director General Dilrukshi Dias Wickremasinghe PC had sought to initiate contempt proceedings against Rajapaksa for his failure to appear before the commission and produce an affidavit in connection with investigations into his assets.

The commission stated that it had commenced an investigation into the assets of the parliamentarian which would be an indictable offence under the Bribery Act and that the investigations revealed evidence to substantiate an offence of Bribery.

The commission said that through a notice dated 14 December 2015 it had requested Rajapaksa to produce an affidavit on 20 January 2016.

Rajapaksa replied on 19 January 2016, requesting more time to send the affidavit, to which the commission responded positively, giving him time until 15 March. However, on 15 March, the commission said he had requested a copy of the commission’s complaint.

The commission wrote to him that it could not provide a copy as he was not entitled to it and asked him to submit an affidavit before 17 April, which he did not do, the commission revealed. But the content of the letter was disputed by Jayantha Weerasinghe PC, appearing on behalf of Rajapaksa, and through a letter dated 25 May he had replied to the summons and objected to its legality.

Gamini Marapana PC with Shavindra Fernando PC and Navin Marapana appeared for Rajapaksa. Additional Solicitor General Sanjay Rajaratnam with Deputy Solicitor General Nerin Pulle appeared for the Attorney General as amicus curie (literally, friend of the court to assist).

Share This Article

Facebook Twitter


1. All comments will be moderated by the Daily FT Web Editor.

2. Comments that are abusive, obscene, incendiary, defamatory or irrelevant will not be published.

3. We may remove hyperlinks within comments.

4. Kindly use a genuine email ID and provide your name.

5. Spamming the comments section under different user names may result in being blacklisted.


Today's Columnists

Our Cricket Board simply cannot deliver – why not they all quit honourably?

Tuesday, 18 June 2019

“It is necessary, therefore, for the Government to pay serious attention to the doings of Sri Lanka Cricket [board] and take immediate action to lift their game for the progress of our glorious game.” Question for Sri Lanka Cricket (board) Sri La

Yesterday Tamils, today Muslims and tomorrow who?

Tuesday, 18 June 2019

From the time of S.W.R.D. Bandaranaike’s election victory in 1956, one and only one issue had dominated political party campaigns in this country; and that was communalism. The Tamil community was the main focus of these campaigns for over 50 years

Those who go by social proof are easy prey to crafty schemers

Monday, 17 June 2019

Going after social proof Swiss writer and novelist, Rolf Dobelli, in one of the essays in his 2013 book ‘The Art of Thinking Clearly’, has given a fine warning to his readers. He has warned against going by ‘social proof’ or ‘majority view

Poson ponderings on positional power: ‘Authority vested’ vs. ‘authority wasted’

Monday, 17 June 2019

We witnessed a serene Poson Poya, in a far more improved security setting in Sri Lanka. Whilst the Sri Lankan life slowly returning to normal, political fronts do not appear to show the same. Has the political power become the people ‘pava’ (sin)

Columnists More