Home / News/ SC postpones Namal Rajapaksa contempt proceedings for 16 Jan.

SC postpones Namal Rajapaksa contempt proceedings for 16 Jan.


Comments / {{hitsCtrl.values.hits}} Views / Thursday, 1 December 2016 00:03


By S.S. Selvanayagam

The Supreme Court yesterday postponed the contempt proceedings against Hambantota District Parliamentarian Namal Rajapaksa for 16 January.

The bench, comprising Chief Justice K. Sripavan and Justice Buwaneka Aluvihara, postponed the matter because Justice Priyasath Dep was not present.

The Supreme Court on 15 September directed the Bribery Commission to file charges against Rajapaksa on or before 3 October for the alleged offence of contempt of the Bribery Commission. Court rejected the preliminary objections raised by Rajapaksa.

The Bribery Commission filed charges against Rajapaksa in the Supreme Court for allegedly disrespecting the commission’s authority by failing to appear before it on 26 May.

Then Director General Dilrukshi Dias Wickremasinghe PC had sought to initiate contempt proceedings against Rajapaksa for his failure to appear before the commission and produce an affidavit in connection with investigations into his assets.

The commission stated that it had commenced an investigation into the assets of the parliamentarian which would be an indictable offence under the Bribery Act and that the investigations revealed evidence to substantiate an offence of Bribery.

The commission said that through a notice dated 14 December 2015 it had requested Rajapaksa to produce an affidavit on 20 January 2016.

Rajapaksa replied on 19 January 2016, requesting more time to send the affidavit, to which the commission responded positively, giving him time until 15 March. However, on 15 March, the commission said he had requested a copy of the commission’s complaint.

The commission wrote to him that it could not provide a copy as he was not entitled to it and asked him to submit an affidavit before 17 April, which he did not do, the commission revealed. But the content of the letter was disputed by Jayantha Weerasinghe PC, appearing on behalf of Rajapaksa, and through a letter dated 25 May he had replied to the summons and objected to its legality.

Gamini Marapana PC with Shavindra Fernando PC and Navin Marapana appeared for Rajapaksa. Additional Solicitor General Sanjay Rajaratnam with Deputy Solicitor General Nerin Pulle appeared for the Attorney General as amicus curie (literally, friend of the court to assist).


Share This Article


DISCLAIMER:

1. All comments will be moderated by the Daily FT Web Editor.

2. Comments that are abusive, obscene, incendiary, defamatory or irrelevant will not be published.

3. We may remove hyperlinks within comments.

4. Kindly use a genuine email ID and provide your name.

5. Spamming the comments section under different user names may result in being blacklisted.

COMMENTS

Today's Columnists

In the desert of Tamil films, actor Sivaji Ganesan was an oasis

Saturday, 22 September 2018

‘Indian Film,’ first published in 1963 and co-authored by former Columbia University Professor Erik Barnouw and his student Dr. Subrahmanyam Krishnaswamy, is considered a seminal study of the evolution and growth of Indian cinema. The book is cit


Imran may turn blind eye to blasphemy law and persecution of Ahmadiyyas

Saturday, 22 September 2018

There are clear signs that Pakistan’s freshly minted Prime Minister, Imran Khan, will make a sincere effort to reduce corruption and maladministration in the domestic sphere. In foreign affairs he is likely to make a brave attempt to mend fences wi


The rate of exchange, capital flight and the Central Bank

Friday, 21 September 2018

The Central Bank (CBSL) exists for the sole purpose of price stability. Its controls on the financial system and monetary policy exist to maintain price stability. As put forth many times by the Governor, the failing of the CBSL to control inflation


Red flag over the Sri Lankan Navy

Friday, 21 September 2018

Shocking story Rusiripala, a former banker in Sri Lanka, who has taken to writing in Daily FT, is perturbed by the red flag I have raised (Daily FT article 18 September) over the shocking charge that our Navy had operated a ransom gang that had abduc


Columnists More