Home / News/ CSN challenges revocation of its broadcasting license; CA extends order for status quo to remain til

CSN challenges revocation of its broadcasting license; CA extends order for status quo to remain til


Comments / {{hitsCtrl.values.hits}} Views / Saturday, 19 November 2016 00:00

Facebook

By S.S. Selvanayagam

The Court of Appeal has extended till 15 December its order to maintain status quo (existing state of affairs) in respect of the licenses issued for four frequencies allocated to Carlton Sports Network (CSN) allocated by the Telecommunications Regulatory Commission.

Court has already issued notices on Mass Media Ministry Secretary, Minister Gayantha Karunatillake, Telecommunications Regulatory Commission and its Director General pursuant to a Writ petition filed by Carlton Sports Network Ltd. challenging the impugned decision to revoke its Television Broadcasting License.

The Bench comprised Justices Vijith Malalgoda (President/CA) and S. Thurairajah.

CSN cited Parliamentary Reforms and Mass Media Ministry Secretary Nimal Bopage, Minister Gayantha Karunatillake, TRC and its Director General Sunil S. Sirisena as Respondents.

Sanjeeva Jayawardane PC with Kaushalya Molligoda, Lakmini Warusevitane and Charitha Rupasinghe instructed by Nisanka Wijesinghe appeared for CSN. Additional Solicitor General Sanjay Rajaratnam appeared for the State.

CSN states it is engaged in carrying on the business of the operating of a terrestrial television network of the production of television program content for broadcast.

It claims it has not violated any of the terms and conditions contained in its license. It maintains the purported revocation has been resorted to, as a pre-emptive strike, without even affording it the basic right and concomitant safeguard of being issued some form of showcause or intimation of the allegations against it.

It contends that the right to be heard is indispensable, non-derogable, inalienable and indivisible right and safeguard.

It alleges the purported revocation by the Media Ministry Secretary is utterly and most grievously ultra vires (beyond his legal power or authority) and illegal, arbitrary, capricious and unreasonable and violative of the basic principles of natural justice.

It is seeking the Court to quash the purported decision by the Ministry Secretary and restrain the Secretary from interfering with the operation and function and broadcasts of its television channel.


Share This Article

Facebook Twitter


DISCLAIMER:

1. All comments will be moderated by the Daily FT Web Editor.

2. Comments that are abusive, obscene, incendiary, defamatory or irrelevant will not be published.

3. We may remove hyperlinks within comments.

4. Kindly use a genuine email ID and provide your name.

5. Spamming the comments section under different user names may result in being blacklisted.

COMMENTS

Today's Columnists

Whither Sri Lanka?

Wednesday, 19 June 2019

On Easter Sunday, 21 April 2019, suicide bombers from an extremist group caused carnage in six separate locations in Sri Lanka. Over 250 lives were lost and as many injured. The magnitude and co-ordination of their operation indicate several months o


Our Cricket Board simply cannot deliver – why not they all quit honourably?

Tuesday, 18 June 2019

“It is necessary, therefore, for the Government to pay serious attention to the doings of Sri Lanka Cricket [board] and take immediate action to lift their game for the progress of our glorious game.” Question for Sri Lanka Cricket (board) Sri La


Yesterday Tamils, today Muslims and tomorrow who?

Tuesday, 18 June 2019

From the time of S.W.R.D. Bandaranaike’s election victory in 1956, one and only one issue had dominated political party campaigns in this country; and that was communalism. The Tamil community was the main focus of these campaigns for over 50 years


Those who go by social proof are easy prey to crafty schemers

Monday, 17 June 2019

Going after social proof Swiss writer and novelist, Rolf Dobelli, in one of the essays in his 2013 book ‘The Art of Thinking Clearly’, has given a fine warning to his readers. He has warned against going by ‘social proof’ or ‘majority view


Columnists More